Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008560
Original file (20080008560.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       12 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008560 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states he was medically evacuated to Japan and remained in the hospital for three months.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) and a Department of Veterans Affairs Rating Decision, dated 21 July 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Most of the applicant’s Regular Army records are not available to the Board for review.  However, there were sufficient documents available for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 December 1968.  His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 23 May 1969 to 2 April 1970.

4.  A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 30 May 1970, shows that the applicant was walking through the gate at the Rest and Recreation Center at Bien Tuy and was shot on 1 April 1970.  An investigation by the Army’s Criminal Investigation Division (CID) and the Army of the Republic of Vietnam’s CID disclosed that a Vietnamese national, working on guard duty at the Rest and Recreation Center gate, accidentally discharged his rifle, causing a bullet to strike the applicant in the left leg.

5.  On 12 November 1971, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device (1960).

6.  The applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Regrettably, the available evidence of record shows that the applicant was shot when a gate guard accidentally discharged his rifle, causing a bullet to strike him in the left leg.  Although the gate guard was a Vietnamese national, there is no evidence of record to show that the applicant’s injury was other than the result of an accident, not the result of hostile action.  

2.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to show the applicant met all the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_____xx_  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by him in service to our Nation.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.  




      _______ _ xxxx_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008560





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008560



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006831

    Original file (20120006831.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states the aircraft commander and he were severely injured and medically evacuated to the 67th Evacuation Hospital at Pleiku and to the 61st Medical Battalion in Qui Nhon. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 16 October 1971 * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 30 September 1980 * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Self-authored memoir of the events that led to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017887

    Original file (20090017887.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c. Standard Form 504 (Clinical Record - History) shows the applicant was injured on 2 March 1970 and received initial medical treatment at the 67th Evacuation Hospital. Within 2 days, military medical personnel annotated the applicant's medical chart to show he received his gunshot wound by an accidental shot from an M-16 rifle. Therefore, in the absence of military and medical records showing the applicant's injury resulted from enemy forces, there is insufficient evidence upon which to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010026

    Original file (20070010026.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration that his records be corrected to show that a Soldier intentionally shot him in the abdomen during his foreign service tour in the Republic of Vietnam and then award him the Purple Heart. The applicant states, in pertinent part, that he was not injured by an accidental discharge from a rifle on 13 January 1968 as reported through military medical and personnel communications while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Army Regulation 600-8-22...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001555C070205

    Original file (20060001555C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    James Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or injured a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016572

    Original file (20080016572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 40 (Wounds) on the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was wounded on 17 January 1968. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel record which shows that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to award the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010388

    Original file (20110010388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he was awarded the Purple Heart in Vietnam and he feels it should be listed on his DD Form 214. This was markedly aggravated by a fall on the left shoulder subsequent to a bullet wound injury involving the right and left lower legs while engaged in combat in RVN. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002082382C070215

    Original file (2002082382C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS : That his records be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart Medal. EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show: Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Vietnam Service Medal is authorized for all members of the armed forces who served in Vietnam or its contiguous waters or airspace during the period 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009595

    Original file (20080009595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he was given a Purple Heart, but he told them he did not want it. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant awarding the applicant the Purple Heart.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010817

    Original file (20100010817.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not document any combat wounds, and there is no other evidence in his service records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds. Regrettably, absent evidence which conclusively shows that the applicant sustained wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for those wounds or injuries, and that this treatment was made a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005669

    Original file (20080005669.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's request for award of the Purple Heart and the supporting evidence were carefully considered. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being considered was received as a direct result of, or was caused by hostile enemy action.