Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008277
Original file (20080008277.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008277 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in essence, promotion from private (PVT)/E-2 to private first class (PFC)/E-3. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, in November 1977, while in Hanau, Germany, his unit commander agreed to his rank change to PFC/E-3 when he was selected to be the new motor pool dispatcher.  Upon discharge for breach of contract, he went to college and after a short time, his father was killed in a tragic motor vehicle accident, so he did not pursue the matter. 

3.  The applicant did not provide additional documentary evidence in support of this application.     

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  On 3 December 1976, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army as a
PVT/E-1 for a period of 4 years.  His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows that he successfully completed basic combat training; however, he failed both the military occupational specialty (MOS) courses in MOS 91G (Behavior Science Specialist) and MOS 76P (Stock Control and Accounting Specialist).  On 27 May 1977, he was reassigned to Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, to attend the MOS 12C (Bridge Specialist) course.  On 13 July 1977, the applicant successfully completed training in and was awarded MOS 12C.  

3.  On 3 June 1977, the applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of
PVT/E-2.  There is no evidence in his official military records to show he was recommended for or promoted to the grade and rank of PFC/E-3  

4.  On 4 August 1977, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice for failing to go to his place of duty.  His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of $50.00 pay. 

5.  On 6 August 1977, the applicant was assigned to Germany.  His DA Form 2-1 shows that he performed duties as a transport operator with the 814th Engineer Company, 559th Engineer Battalion.

6.  On 17 January 1978, the applicant was released from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-200, chapter 5-32, by reason of convenience of the government – nonfulfillment of service contract.  The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant's release from active duty are not contained in the official record.  His service was characterized as honorable and he was credited with completion of 1 year, 1 month, and 15 days of active duty.  He was transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) for completion of his remaining military service obligation.  On
2 December 1982, he was discharged from the USAR Control Group upon completion of his military service obligation.  This order shows that his rank and grade at the time of his discharge was PVT/E-2.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served in the Regular Army from 3 December 1976 through 
17 January 1978.  The specific facts and circumstances leading to his discharge are unknown.

2.  The applicant was promoted to the rank and grade of PVT/E-2 on 3 June 1977.  He was assigned to Germany and his DA Form 2-1 shows that he 
performed duties as a transport operator with the 814th Engineer Company, 559th Engineer Battalion.  There is no evidence that he performed duties as a motor pool dispatcher.

3.  There is no evidence that the applicant was recommended for or promoted to the rank and grade of PFC/E-3.  His DD Form 214 shows that he held the rank and grade of PVT/E-2 at the time of his discharge.  The applicant has failed to provide any substantive evidence supporting his contentions.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, administrative regularity is presumed in the applicant's record.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant did not submit any evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


															XXX
      ______________________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008277



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008277



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007930

    Original file (20080007930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006375

    Original file (20080006375.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence in the applicant's record that he was recommended for or promoted to SP4/E-4. The applicant has not provided any evidence to show he was promoted to SP4/E-4. XXX _______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000418

    Original file (20080000418.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records as follows: a. show completion of the Ranger, Airborne, and Air Assault Courses; b. show his service in support of Operations Desert Shield/Storm during the Gulf War; c. show award o the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Good Service Medal (sic) [the Good Conduct Medal]; d. show the combat badge (sic) [the shoulder sleeve insignia for former wartime service or commonly known as the combat patch]; and e. show the correct rank/grade. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008301

    Original file (20080008301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of the applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows the entries SP4 and E-4, respectively. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows he had an out-of-State job transfer while serving in the Army National Guard. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows he was promoted again to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003771

    Original file (20080003771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to change the applicant's rank from PFC to CPL in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004422

    Original file (20090004422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change the reason for his discharge and the reenlistment code. On 9 October 1987, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 16-5b, due to a locally-imposed bar to reenlistment. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing 3C in item 27 (Reenlistment Code)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013459

    Original file (20100013459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the following corrections be made to his military records: a. restoration to the rank and pay grade of private (PV2)/E-2 from the period 1 September 1978 to 21 September 1979, b. refund of all pay forfeited as a result of his sentencing and reduction in grade, c. promotion consideration to the grade of private first class (PFC)/E-3, d. promotion consideration to the grade of specialist (SPC)/E-4 prior to his separation on 21 September 1979, and e. payment of all due...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009774

    Original file (20080009774.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Section 4 (Chronological Record of Military Service) of the applicant’s DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows the applicant received “Excellent” efficiency and conduct ratings throughout his military assignments. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003217

    Original file (20080003217.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his request for discharge, the applicant indicated that he understood that by requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charges against him, or of a lesser included offense, that also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct discharge or a discharge under other honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he was discharged for the good of the service with an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions characterization of service. Although an honorable or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014335

    Original file (20140014335.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Someone saw him on the truck and told the colonel he broke restriction. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 9 months, and 9 days. c. There is no evidence in his records and he provides none to show he was advanced above the rank/grade of PVT/E-1 between the date of his last reduction and the date of separation.