Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008275
Original file (20080008275.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	      23 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008275


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests administrative corrections to his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge), including 3, not 4, bronze campaign stars, and the Army of Occupation Medal.

2.  The applicant states the subject form incorrectly indicates in Item 34 (Service Outside Continental US [CONUS] and Return) that he departed CONUS on 21 December 1943 and arrived at Manila Bay (Philippine Islands, PI) on 14 January 1944.  It also incorrectly indicates that he participated in the Philippine Islands Campaign for which he earned a bronze campaign star (now known as bronze service stars).  The applicant argues that he could not have arrived at Manila Bay in January 1944 because Manila and Corregidor were under Japanese control until March 1945.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  His WD AGO Form 53-55, front and back.

	b.  A document labeled Battalion Diary, Headquarters Boat Battalion, 533rd Engineer Boat and Shore Regiment, Third Engineer Special Brigade, dated 6 November 1945.

	c.  A privacy act form from the office of US Senator Arlen Specter.

	d.  A letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) to US Senator Specter, dated 29 April 2008.
	e.  A letter from US Senator Specter to the NPRC, dated 21 April 2008.

	f.  A letter from the applicant to the NPRC, dated 1 April 2008, with a Request Pertaining to Military Records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.  

3.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States (AUS) on 14 August 1942 and reported for active duty on the same date.  He reported for duty at Camp Edwards, MA and was assigned to the recently activated 3rd Engineer Amphibian Brigade, which included the 593rd Engineer Boat Regiment and the 533rd Engineer Shore Regiment.

4.  The applicant was assigned to the Boat Regiment and underwent his basic training on Nantucket Sound.  He was ultimately designated a coxswain and assigned to a landing craft.

5.  On 25 May 1943 at the Presidio of Monterey, Monterey, CA, the brigade was redesignated the 533rd Engineer Boat and Shore Regiment (533rd EB&SR).  Training continued in and around Monterey, CA until the Regiment received orders to embark for the Asiatic-Pacific Theater of Operations (APTO).  On/about 21 December 1943, the applicant's unit sailed from San Francisco, CA aboard the SS Cape Perpetua bound for Milne Bay, New Guinea.  After a 24-day voyage, the unit disembarked the SS Cape Perpetua at Milne Bay.
6.  The 533rd Engineer Boat and Shore Regiment fought throughout the APTO and, upon cessation of hostilities, performed occupation duty in Japan from 25 November to 5 December 1945; however the applicant's records shows he departed his unit on 16 November 1945 en route to the US for discharge.

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in World War II and the Korean War.  This document shows the applicant's unit participated in three campaigns and twice received assault landing credit.  The unit also was cited for award of the Philippine Republic Presidential Unit Citation and the Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp from 25 November to 5 December 1945.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests corrections to his WD AGO Form 53-55 and award of the Army of Occupation Medal.

2.  The applicant is absolutely correct in stating he did not sail from San Francisco in December 1943 and arrive at Manila Bay on 14 January 1944.  His troop ship, SS Cape Perpetua, landed at Milne Bay, New Guinea.  Item 34 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected to show Milne Bay, New Guinea vice Manila Bay, PI.

3.  Item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) shows the applicant participated in the Philippine Islands Campaign, as well as three other campaigns, and that he received 4 bronze service stars for wear on his Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal.  The dates for the Philippine Islands Campaign are 7 December 1941 to 10 May 1942.  During this time, the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor and immediately turned their attention to conquering the Philippines.  The applicant was not even inducted into military service until 14 August 1942; therefore, it is clear he did not participate in this campaign.

4.  The applicant participated in 3 campaigns during World War II; he is entitled to wear 3 bronze service stars on his Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal.  He is also entitled to wear 2 bronze arrowheads for assault landings in the Philippine Islands – Malabang and Parang, Mindinao, PI

5.  The applicant transferred from his unit on 16 November 1945 en route back to the US for discharge.  His unit went on to perform occupation duty in Japan from 25 November to 5 December 1945.  Only Soldiers who were still assigned and actually performing the occupation duty are entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal.  The applicant does not seem to qualify.
6.  The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 should be corrected as indicated below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  Deleting from Item 32 (Battles and Campaigns) the entry "PHILIPPINE ISLANDS" as an authorized campaign;

	b.  Deleting from Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) the "ASIATIC-PACIFIC CAMPAIGN MEDAL WITH 4 BRONZE SERVICE STARS AND 1 BRONZE ARROWHEAD," and replacing it with the "ASIATIC-PACIFIC CAMPAIGN MEDAL WITH 3 BRONZE SERVICE STARS AND 2 BRONZE ARROWHEADS;" and

	c.  Deleting from Item 34 (Service Outside Continental US and Return) the entry 'MANILA BAY" and replacing it with the entry "MILNE BAY, NG."

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Army of Occupation Medal.



      _________X______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008275



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008275



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063125C070421

    Original file (2001063125C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register), dated 6 July 1961, will show whether or not a World War II unit was authorized occupation credit and, thus, entitlement to the Army Occupation Medal. The evidence of record also indicates the applicant is entitled to the AOM with Japan Clasp and credit for participation in the Luzon Campaign. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by issuing to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001058080C070420

    Original file (2001058080C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 8 November 1945, he was recommended for award of the Bronze Star with “V” for actions in the Philippines. Therefore, the Board believes the applicant should be awarded the BSM for meritorious service. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records should be corrected as recommended below.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003069

    Original file (20080003069.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-1 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards, campaign, and assault credits received by units serving during World War II. By letter dated 9 June 2005, the National Personnel Records Center informed the applicant he would be sent a number of awards; however, a bronze service star for the Philippine Liberation Ribbon was not listed as one of those awards/appurtenances. Based on the authorized campaigns of New Guinea,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073217C070403

    Original file (2002073217C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded: NOTE: The Army Review Boards Agency in St. Louis is requested to correct the applicant’s records to show award of the World War II Victory Medal, the Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019296

    Original file (20130019296.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the daughter of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of the FSM's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) to show that he participated in the Philippine Campaign during World War II and award of the Philippine Liberation Medal and any other awards and decorations to which he is entitled. The FSM's available record is void of evidence and the applicant has not provided evidence showing specific geographic...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079785C070215

    Original file (2002079785C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records do not show that he or the unit in which he served, the 814th Military Police Company, received campaign credit for the Philippine Islands Campaign which occurred from 7 December 1941 to 10 May 1942. Item 33 (Decorations and Citations) of the applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows that the applicant received the Philippine Liberation Medal with one bronze service star. Paragraph 3-13d(3) of Army Regulation 600-8-22 also provides that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150004254

    Original file (20150004254.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the son of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of his late father's WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and bronze service arrowhead (currently known as an arrowhead device). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062127C070421

    Original file (2001062127C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation-Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Philippine Defense Ribbon and the Philippine Independence Ribbon. APPLICANT STATES : That his unit, the 226th Field Artillery (FA) Battalion (Bn), was part of the XXIV Corps during the Leyte Campaign. DISCUSSION : Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029171

    Original file (20100029171.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Philippine Defense Ribbon and the Philippine Liberation Ribbon. The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to show the Philippine Defense Ribbon and the Philippine Liberation Ribbon.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071671C070402

    Original file (2002071671C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The records herein were provided by the applicant. The Board must consider that the applicant's leaders and medical personnel were aware of his injury and the circumstances of that injury but did not award him the Purple Heart. As presented, the evidence does not indicate that the applicant’s injuries were the result of enemy action and as such does not meet the criteria for award of the Purple Heart.