Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008084
Original file (20080008084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  12 August 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008084 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to honorable.  He further requests that his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) show his overseas service.

2.  The applicant states that there is no error in his records.  He just wants his discharge upgraded to honorable and to show that he served overseas

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  On 28 September 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 
3 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 13F (Engineer Tracked Vehicle Crewman).  He was subsequently assigned to Fort Hood, Texas.

3.  On 1 December 1983, the applicant was promoted to specialist four, pay grade E-4.

4.  On 14 June 1984, the applicant was placed on assignment for duty in the Republic of Korea.    

5.  On 27 August 1984, the applicant accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for being absent without leave during the period from 18 July to 1 August 1984 and for disobeying a lawful order.  The punishment included reduction to pay grade E-2 and a forfeiture of $250 pay per month for 2 months.  The applicant did not appeal the punishment.

6.  On 31 August 1984, the applicant was assigned for duty as an engineer track vehicle crewman with the 2nd Engineer Battalion, in the Republic of Korea.

7.  The applicant received the following counseling statements:

	a.  on 12 November 1984 for missing an accountability formation;

	b.  on 4 December 1984 for missing an accountability formation and physical training; and

	c.  on 5 December 1984 he was informed that his misconduct could lead to his separation from the military.

8.  On 4 December 1984, the applicant accepted NJP for failing to go to his appointed place of duty.   The punishment included 14 days extra duty and restriction. 

9.  On 12 December 1984, the applicant’s commander recommended that he be separated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance.  The applicant subsequently waived all of his rights to include consulting with counsel.  


10.  On 12 December 1984, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed that he be issued a General Discharge Certificate.  He was not to be transferred to the United States Army Reserve.  He was subsequently returned to the United States.  He completed 
4 months and 12 days overseas service in the Republic of Korea.

11.  Item 12f (Foreign Service) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he served 4 months and 12 days of overseas service.

12.  Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 9 January 1985.  He had completed 2 years, 2 months, and 28 days of creditable active service and had 14 days lost time due to AWOL.

13.  There is no indication that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statue of limitations.

14.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 13 contains the policy and outlines the procedures for separating individuals for unsatisfactory performance, and provides, in pertinent part, that commanders will separate a member under this chapter when, in the commander’s judgment, the member will not develop sufficiently to participate satisfactorily in further training and/or become a satisfactory Soldier.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights.

2.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons therefore were appropriate considering all of the facts of the case.

3.  The applicant has not provided any evidence or sufficiently mitigating argument to warrant upgrade of his discharge.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 clearly shows that he served overseas for a period of 4 months and 12 days.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ____X___  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



	__________X_____________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008084



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005013

    Original file (20140005013.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Based on his service in Korea, he is eligible for award of the Overseas Service Ribbon and the Korea Defense Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending: a. item 12f of his DD Form 214 to show 11 months and 27 days of foreign service; b. his DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017025

    Original file (20090017025.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following: a. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 12 May 1993; b. a letter from the National Personnel Records Center, dated 31 August 2009; and c. two excerpts from the website at "veteranmedals.army.mil" describing the Kuwait Liberation Medal (Government of Kuwait) and the Korea Defense Service Medal. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Korea Defense Service Medal is authorized for award to members of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017318

    Original file (AR20080017318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, on 28 October 1986, the applicant was discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge, in the rank and pay grade of Private (PV1)/E-1, pursuant to the sentence of a special court-martial. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011150

    Original file (20100011150.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 April 1985, at Camp Casey, Korea, a board of officers convened to hear testimony and review evidence pertaining to whether the applicant should be discharged from the Army for unsatisfactory performance. There is no record the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board seeking a discharge upgrade during that board's 15-year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that Soldiers with more than 6 years of total active and Reserve military service at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008856

    Original file (20080008856.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to add his overseas service in Grenada and his completion of Sniper School. The applicant has provided a copy of a Certificate of Achievement, awarded to him by the Commander, United States Military Support Element Grenada, dated 11 February 1985, It cites the applicant for his outstanding service and achievement while assigned as a cavalry scout with the 2nd Battalion,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001234C070205

    Original file (20060001234C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his discharge document to show award of the Korea Defense Service Medal, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and one Overseas Service Bar. In addition, the evidence of records shows that service in Vietnam and the Persian Gulf (i.e., Operation Desert Storm) of periods less than 6 months duration, which otherwise meets the requirements for the award of overseas service bars, may be combined to determine the total number of overseas service bars...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019180

    Original file (20130019180.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his dates of overseas service in Korea and award of the Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM). Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010821

    Original file (20090010821.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) to show award of the Korean Service Medal. There is no available evidence of record showing the applicant's exact dates of service in the Republic of Korea. However, to provide a record of the applicant's service in the Republic of Korea, he is entitled to the Korea Defense Service Medal and it should be added to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019182

    Original file (20080019182.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, he does not believe that these awards are recorded in his military records. The evidence of record shows that meritorious service awards may be awarded, upon retirement, which may include periods of service longer than that served in the recommending command and that such period is limited to the last 10 years of service. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served a qualifying period of service for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022741

    Original file (20110022741.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 indicates: a. in item 27, he was awarded or authorized the Korean Service Medal with three bronze service stars, one overseas service bar, United Nations Service Medal, and Army of Occupation Medal with Japan Clasp; and b. in item 28, his most significant duty assignment was Headquarters and Service Company, 106th Engineer Battalion (Combat), 31st Infantry Division, Camp Atterbury, IN. He provides an unsigned statement from a former fellow Soldier, dated 4 July 2010, who...