Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008001
Original file (20080008001.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       13 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080008001 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 4 March 1988 be corrected to show he served 3 continuous years of active duty.

2.  The applicant states that he applied for a job under the Veterans Employment Opportunities Act (VEOA) and it requires that you serve 3 continuous years of active duty.  He states that he entered active duty on 12 February 1985 and was released from active duty on 4 March 1988 which is a total of 3 years and 
1 month.  However, his net active service on his DD Form 214 shows 2 years, 
11 months, and 17 days.  The applicant states that he was credited for the overall service time as being served but not given the credit on the net time due to an early out program that was given even though we were told full credit for time served would be credited and we would not be penalized which is what occurred.

3.  The applicant provides DD Form 214 and an Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 19 January 1993.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 February 1985 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11H (Heavy Anti-Armor Weapons Infantryman).

3.  On 24 October 1985, the applicant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, by a summary court-martial, of being absent without leave (AWOL) for the period 
2 October 1985 through 10 October 1985.  His sentence consisted of a forfeiture of $187.00 per month for one month and 30 days confinement.

4.  On 4 March 1988, the applicant was honorably released from active duty under the Fiscal Year 88 Early Transition Program after completing 2 years, 
11 months, and 17 days of creditable active service with 35 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.  His DD Form 214 with the ending period 4 March 1988 shows the entry of "85" year(s), "02" month(s), and "12" day(s) in item 12f (Date Entered AD This Period).  Item 12b shows the entry "88" year(s), "03" month(s), and "04" day(s).  Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) shows the entry "02" year(s), "11" month(s), and "17 day(s)."  Item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows 2 October 1985 through 10 October 1985 and 
12 October 1985 through 7 November 1985 as lost time under Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972.

5.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 972 (Members:  effect of time lost), subsection (a) states that an enlisted member who (1) deserts; (2) is absent for more than 1 day without proper authority; (3) is confined by military or civilian authorities for more than 1 day in connection with a trial, whether before, during, or after the trial; or (4) is incapacitated for duty due to intemperate use of drugs or alcohol or because of disease or injury resulting from his misconduct; is liable to make up that lost time.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be changed to show that he served on active duty for a period of 3 years and 1 month.  Evidence of record shows he entered active duty on 12 February 1985 and was released from active duty on 4 March 1988.  This totals 3 years and 22 days.  However, the applicant had 35 days of lost time due to AWOL and confinement.  This meant he was liable to make up that lost time.  Therefore, 35 days of lost time was subtracted from his total service of 3 years and 22 days, which left the applicant with a net active service of 2 years, 11 months, and 17 days.  The applicant's DD Form 
214 is correct as currently constituted and there is an insufficient basis for changing it. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___xx___  ____xx__  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ______xxxx____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008001



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008001



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009028

    Original file (20090009028.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, copies of his DD Form 214; three pages from his enlistment contract; a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action); and his previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision AR20040002622, dated 7 April 2005. The applicant's military personnel records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 3 January 1985 for a period of 3 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009753

    Original file (20130009753.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of the entry "129 days of time lost under Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 972" from his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty). Item 44 (Time Lost under Section 972, Title 10, USC, and Subsequent to Normal Date of Expiration of Term of Service (ETS)) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * AWOL – 31 October 1971-2 November 1971 – 3 days * AWOL – 4 September 1972-3 October 1971 – 30 days (lined through) * DFR – 4...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003099

    Original file (20140003099.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1975, the applicant was advised in writing of being recommended for elimination from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-206 (Personnel Separations – Discharge – Misconduct) due to his conviction by civil authorities on the charge of robbery. Item 44 (Time Lost Under Section 972, Title 10, U.S. Code (USC) and Subsequent to Normal Date of Expiration of Term of Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows the following: * AWOL – 11 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000079

    Original file (20130000079.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records contain an Enlisted Record Brief (ERB), dated 11 February 2002, wherein it shows in: a. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that shows a DD Form 214 was ever completed or issued to him. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the applicant a DD Form 214 for the period 10 May 1985 through 13 May 2005 and showing in: * Item 1 (Name (Last, First, Middle)) – as shown on his enlistment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019876

    Original file (20130019876.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge and correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) as follows: * item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) from 23 June 1985 to 11 November 1984 * item 12b (Separation Date This Period) from 7 September 2005 to 16 July 2004 * item 18 (Remarks) to list each period of enlistment and discharge characterization 2. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged as a result of a court-martial in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001060

    Original file (20110001060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show 4 years, 5 months, and 3 days in item 12c (Net Active Service this Period) and 22 days in item 12e (Total Prior Inactive Service). The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of creditable active service. Therefore, his DD Form 214 correctly shows he completed a total of 1 year, 6 months, and 24 days of creditable active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007305

    Original file (20120007305.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), includes a DD Form 4/1 (Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) that shows he enlisted in the RA on 13 October 1981 for a period of 4 years. Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents that are prepared for individuals upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. There is no evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016337

    Original file (AR20080016337.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a copy of United States Army Court of Military Review, Appellate Military Judges, United States (Appellee) versus [Applicant] in Army Court of Military Review 8801623, Decision, dated 31 October 1988, that shows on consideration of the entire record, the Court held the findings of guilty and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000557

    Original file (20140000557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was retained 2 years beyond his expiration of term of service (ETS) date to initiate administrative separation in violation of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), and Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration). d. Under Army Regulation 635-200, a Soldier in civilian confinement and not under military control will be separated under paragraph 2-13b which states, "A Soldier in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008768

    Original file (20080008768.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he had three honorable discharges, and he feels that his dishonorable discharge should be upgraded. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. The applicant’s good post-service conduct is commendable; however, it does not warrant granting the relief requested.