Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007639
Original file (20080007639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  	  24 July 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007639 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the rank on his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 30 June 1966 be changed from the permanent rank of sergeant first class/E-6 to sergeant first class/ E-7.

2.  The applicant states that he retired as a sergeant first class/E-7 and due to a discrepancy on his DD Form 214 he has been paid as a staff sergeant/E-6. 

3.  The applicant provides a letter, dated 30 January 2008, from the National Personnel Records Center, St. Louis, Missouri; a Certification of Military Service; and four discharge documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States on 25 June 1943, served as a cook, and was honorably discharged for the purpose of enlistment in the Regular Army on 26 November 1945.  He enlisted on 27 November 1945, served as a rifleman, and was honorably discharged on 4 March 1947.  He enlisted again on 14 April 1948 and remained on active duty through continuous reenlistments until he retired on 30 June 1966.  

3.  Item 3a (Grade, Rate or Rank) on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 
30 June 1966 shows the entry, “SFC [sergeant first class] E-6 (P) [permanent].  

4.  Item 33 (Appointments and Reductions) on the applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was promoted to the permanent grade of sergeant first class/E-6 effective 1 December 1951.   

5.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant was promoted to sergeant first class/E-7. 

6.  The Enlisted Grade Structure of the Army for the period 1 July 1955 to 31 May 1958 listed pay grade E-6 as sergeant first class and E-7 as master sergeant.  The rank of sergeant first class, E-7 was not listed until 1 June 1958. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant’s contentions were noted.  However, evidence of record shows he was promoted to sergeant first class/E-6 on 1 December 1951.  There is no evidence of record which shows he was promoted to sergeant first class/E-7 prior to his retirement.  It appears item 3a on the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 June 1966 is incorrect since the enlisted grade structure of the Army listed pay grade E-6 as staff sergeant as of 1 June 1958, but it is the rank that is incorrect, not the pay grade.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting the applicant’s request. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xx____  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________xxxxx_________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007639



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007639



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005285

    Original file (20120005285.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    An AGUZ Form 658 (Determination of Grade for Retirement, Advancement, Separation or Retirement Pay), dated 14 May 1974, shows the FSM was promoted to MSGT (E-7) on 24 January 1953 and reduced to SFC (E-6) on 16 December 1957 (per orders). Records show the FSM held the grade of E-6 when he was retired from active duty on 31 May 1964 and he was placed on the Retired List in that grade. Records show the FSM was advanced on the Retired List to the grade of SFC (E-7), effective 16 May 1974,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005575

    Original file (20140005575.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. The evidence of record shows the applicant served on active duty from 4 October 1954 to 24 September 1957.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006291

    Original file (20120006291.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states the following new facts are not reflected in his Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceeding nor are they reflected in his military records (DA Form 24 (Service Record) and DD Form 214): a. He provides his DA Form 24, prepared on 22 January 1962, for the period 28 October 1955 to 26 October 1957; and his DA Form 20. His record contains: * DA Form 24 for the period 28 October 1955 to 25 October 1957 which shows he was promoted to SP3 (T) on 24 May...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005481C070208

    Original file (20040005481C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040005481 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests that he receive his discharge from the Enlisted Reserve, that he receive a promotion, and that he be awarded the Purple Heart. He enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 June 1957 as a Sergeant First...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006738

    Original file (20120006738.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. There is no evidence of record available and he provided insufficient evidence to show he was promoted and/or served as a staff sergeant during his period of active duty. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003551

    Original file (20090003551.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade held at the time of separation. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his grade as that of S/Sgt.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009457

    Original file (20130009457.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * DD Form 214, ending on 27 January 1958 * Special Orders (SO) Number 5, dated 8 January 1958 * Discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Letter Orders S01-2554, dated 28 December 1962 * Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 31 December 1962 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Item 3 of the DD Form 214 shows the grade and date of rank of the grade held at the time of separation. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004046

    Original file (20140004046.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DD Form 214 for this period of service (4 October 1951 to 5 January 1958) is not available for review with this case. A DD Form 214 (enlisted) for his period of service from 4 October 1951 to 5 January 1958 is not available for review with this case. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to listing his: * service in Korea from September 1952 to September 1954 * overseas assignments in Germany, Kwajalein, and Korea * rank as sergeant first...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014918

    Original file (20130014918.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 3 (Grade, Rate, Rank, and Date of Appointment) of the DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) of her late husband, a former service (FSM), to show his rank as staff sergeant (SSG), pay grade E-6, with entitlement to back pay. The applicant provided copies of the following: * marriage license which shows she and the FSM were married on 11 June 1952 * two photographs alleged to be of herself and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017114

    Original file (20130017114.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his Honorable Discharge Certificate and DD Form 214. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains correcting...