Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007635
Original file (20080007635.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        13 AUGUST 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007635 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the entry in item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be changed from "Physical Disability – Temporary" to "Physical Disability – Permanent, Combat-Related Injury."  He also essentially requests that a statement be added to item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 which shows that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 
26 U.S.C. 104.  

2.  The applicant essentially states that his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board [PEB] Proceedings), dated 18 December 1986, and DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 27 February 1987 both state that his disability resulted from a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104.  He also states, in effect, that because his DD Form 214 does not state that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) will not give him a combat code.

3.  The applicant provides his DA Form 199, DA Form 3713, "Member-1" and "Member-4" copies of his DD Form 214, and a memorandum, dated 21 July 1988, which shows that he was removed from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and retired due to permanent physical disability in support of this application.




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 November 1984.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 67U (Medium Helicopter Repairer).  He then departed for a tour in Alaska on 21 July 1985 for what would be his first and only permanent duty assignment.

3.  The applicant's military records also show that 10 April 1987, the applicant was honorably retired from the Regular Army and placed on the TDRL on 
11 April 1987.  The Standard Form 502 (Narrative Summary [Clinical Resume]), dated 21 October 1986, that was prepared during the applicant's Medical Evaluation Board essentially shows that the applicant had an approximate 2-year history of knee pain which apparently stemmed from a fall on both of his knees on an obstacle course during basic training. 

4.  Item 28 of the applicant's DD Form 214 has an entry of "Physical Disability – Temporary."  Item 26 (Separation Code) of this document has an entry of "SFK." Item 18 of this document does not contain an entry stating that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104. 

5.  Orders, dated 21 July 1988, removed the applicant from the TDRL on 
4 August 1988, and retired him due to permanent physical disability on 5 August 1988.  

6.  The applicant essentially stated that his DA Form 199, dated 18 December 1986, and DA Form 3713, dated 27 February 1987 both state that his disability resulted from a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104.  He also stated, in effect, that because his DD Form 214 does not state that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury, the DVA will not give him a combat code.
7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The version of this regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's retirement on 10 April 1987 stated that for item 28, enter the narrative reason for separation as shown in Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator [SPD] Codes) based on the regulatory or other authority.

8.  Army Regulation 635-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the narrative reason for separation for a Soldier issued an SPD code of "SFK" was "Physical Disability – Temporary."

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge did not require or provide that a statement indicating that a disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104 be entered in item 18 of the DD Form 214.

10.  Title 26, United States Code, Section 104 defines combat-related as an injury which resulted from armed conflict, extrahazardous service, or under conditions simulating war.

11.  Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR.  This regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity.  The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that the entry in item 28 of his DD Form 214 should be changed from "Physical Disability – Temporary" to "Physical Disability – Permanent, Combat-Related Injury."  He also contends that a statement should be added to item 18 of his DD Form 214 which shows that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104.  

2.  While the applicant was eventually retired due to permanent disability on 
5 August 1988, at the time of his retirement on 10 April 1987, he was only transferred to the TDRL.  As a result, and due to the issuance of an SPD code of "SFK," the entry in item 28 of his DD Form 214 appropriately reflects that the narrative reason for his separation on 10 April 1987 was due to temporary physical disability.  Additionally, as there is no regulatory requirement or provision for adding "Combat-Related Injury" after the proper narrative reason for separation for Soldiers assigned an SPD code of "SFK," there is no basis for changing the applicant's narrative reason for separation shown on his DD Form 214.

3.  While it is unclear why the applicant believes he is being deprived some level of benefits or care from the DVA as a result of his DD Form 214 not containing an entry that his disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104, as there was no requirement or provision that a statement indicating that a disability was the result of a combat-related injury as defined in 26 U.S.C. 104 be entered in item 18 of the DD Form 214, there is no basis for granting relief to this portion of the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  While the Board regrets that a more favorable response could not be accomplished, it wishes to thank the applicant for his service to the United States.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his honorable service in arms.




      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007635



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007635



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019149

    Original file (20090019149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his DA Form 3713 dated 14 July 1988 be corrected to show in item 31 (A Member of an Armed Force) that he did have military service before 24 September 1975 and the statement in item 36 (Remarks) should show his illness occurred under conditions simulating war during a military training exercise. The applicant provides: * Copy of two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * Orders Number D134-19, dated 14 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106710C070208

    Original file (2004106710C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: FEBRUARY 8, 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004106710 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that his records currently reflect that he had a major depressive disorder and that at the time that he was diagnosed, PTSD was not a condition that resulted in people being medically discharged. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001661

    Original file (20130001661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to reflect the proper code to show he was retired due to permanent disability based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) as a direct result of armed conflict or caused by an instrumentality of war and resulted from a combat-related injury as defined in Title 26, U.S. Code, section 104. In block 10c of the DA Form 199, the board will record its...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016212

    Original file (20130016212.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states: * when a combat vehicle is involved in an accident during a combat mission, it is considered a combat-related accident and any injuries caused by the vehicle are also considered combat-related * a DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay) shows "Retired for disability caused by an instrumentality of war and incurred in the line of duty during a period of war" and this statement automatically qualifies him for CRSC * he has been denied CRSC on 3 occasions and he could use the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008239

    Original file (20110008239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) to show the following entries as "Yes" instead of "No": a. On 24 March 2003, he injured his knee while playing basketball at Fort Polk, LA, and he was treated at Bayne-Jones Army Community Hospital, AR. The applicant's DA Form 199 contains the following entries in item 10 (If Retired Because of Disability, the Board Makes the Recommended Finding that): * the Soldier's retirement is not based...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028715

    Original file (20100028715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his 13 December 2004 DA Form 199 (Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) Proceedings) as follows: * Add Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) code 5241 for cervical fusion * Add VASRD code 5003 for degenerative arthritis * Show a 60% combined total disability rating * Payment of back pay and allowances from 5 February 2005 (date placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL)) to the present 2. On 22 October 2004, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001611

    Original file (20130001611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 September 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001611 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of: * item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was permanently retired effective 13 January 2010 * Orders D012-74, dated 13 January 2010, to show his disability was based on an injury or disease received in the line of duty (LOD) during a war period as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016982

    Original file (20140016982.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    c The PEB also considered his other medical conditions as listed on the MEB; however, these conditions were not found to be unfitting and therefore they were not rated. b The PEB also considered his other medical conditions as listed on the MEB; however, these conditions were not found to be unfitting and therefore were not rated. He states the applicant, as a child, never had the mental problems as he did after returning from his second tour of duty in Iraq.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010651

    Original file (20140010651.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB found the applicant's condition prevented him from performing the duties required of his grade and specialty and determined that he was physically unfit due to his disability. The applicant provides: a. The PEB also found that there was no objective evidence that the applicant’s medical condition was a direct result of armed conflict and his PTSD combat stressors could not be validated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9609515C070209

    Original file (9609515C070209.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Medical Evaluation Board (MEBD), dated 25 November 1986, indicates that the applicant’s pay grade was E-1, and recommended that he be referred to a physical evaluation board (PEB). A DA Form 3713, dated 7 November 1988, shows his active duty and retired pay grade as E-1. The Board notes that the applicant’s leave and earnings statement indicates that he was advanced to pay grade E-2 effective 1 September 1986, and that the DA Form 2A and DA Form 2-1 indicate that his date of rank for pay...