IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 19 August 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080007419
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his Honorable Discharge Certificate be corrected to show he was an E-4. He also requests, in effect, that he be issued the Army Service Ribbon, the Overseas Service Ribbon, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.
2. The applicant states that he was an E-4, not an E-3. He also states that he should have received the above awards.
3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and his Honorable Discharge Certificate.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted,
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 June 1980.
3. While in basic training, the applicant qualified as a marksman with the M-16 rifle and as a sharpshooter with the hand grenade.
4. The applicant was advanced to Private First Class (PFC), E-3, on 1 February 1981.
5. On 19 January 1982, the applicant received a local bar to reenlistment.
6. The applicants DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record, Part II), item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he departed Fort Hood, TX, en route to Germany on 23 February 1982.
7. The applicants DD Form 214 indicates he was promoted to Specialist Four (SP4), E-4, effective 1 March 1982. His records do not contain the SP4 advancement document.
8. The applicant arrived in Germany on or about 27 March 1982.
9. A Disposition Form, dated 4 November 1982, indicates the applicants bar to reenlistment was scheduled to be reviewed.
10. The applicants separation orders, dated 25 March 1983, show his rank as PFC.
11. The applicants DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record, Part I), dated 14 April 1983, shows his rank and grade as PFC, E-3, with a date of rank of 1 February 1981. It also shows he was ineligible for reenlistment.
12. Item 27 (Remarks) of his DA Form 2-1 shows the applicant was to receive a reentry (RE) code of 3 as he was not eligible for reenlistment.
13. On 23 June 1983, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve. His DD Form 214 shows his rank and grade as SP4, E-4. It shows he was awarded the Army Service Ribbon, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.
14. On 20 February 1986, the applicant apparently attempted to reenlist in the U. S. Army Reserve. The reenlistment contract was invalid, as he had signed all signature areas on the contract (i.e., the Service Representative Information and Enlistment/Reenlistment Officer Information areas). He also indicated that his rank was PFC on this contract.
15. Effective 23 June 1986, the applicant was honorably discharged from the U. S. Army Reserve. His discharge orders and his Honorable Discharge Certificate indicate his rank as PFC, E-3.
16. On 23 January 2008, as a result of an ABCMR action, the applicants DD Form 214 was amended to add the Overseas Service Ribbon. The applicants current application to the ABCMR is dated 22 March 2008.
17. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 7, governed promotions at the time. In pertinent part, it stated a Soldier was in a nonpromotable status if the Soldier was not qualified for reenlistment due to having a bar to reenlistment.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. On 19 January 1982, the applicant received a local bar to reenlistment. The evidence of record shows the bar to reenlistment was in effect at the time he separated from active duty in June 1983. As a result, he was not eligible to be promoted to SP4, E-4 on 1 March 1982, and his records do not contain the SP4 advancement document. It appears that his DD Form 214 erroneously reflects that he separated from active duty as a SP4, E-4, and should have reflected that he separated as a PFC, E-3.
2. There is no evidence of record to show that the applicant was promoted to SP4, E-4, while he was in the U. S. Army Reserve. Indeed, when he completed the U. S. Army Reserve reenlistment contract in February 1986, he indicated that his rank was PFC, E-3. Therefore, it appears that his Honorable Discharge Certificate properly reflects his rank and grade as PFC.
3. The applicants DD Form 214 was amended in January 2008 to add the Overseas Service Ribbon. As a result of that correction, the applicant should have been issued the Overseas Service Ribbon. His current ABCMR application is dated 22 March 2008, which may have been too soon after the records correction for him to have received this award. If he does not receive it soon, he
should contact the Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis, 9700 Page Avenue, St. Louis, MO 63132-5200 to determine the status of his receiving this award.
4. The applicant may have a valid issue concerning receipt of the Army Service Ribbon, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.
5. The marksmanship qualification badges were earned while the applicant was in basic training. It is possible that his basic training unit never issued the badges to him before he departed.
6. It is also more likely than not that the Army Service Ribbon was never issued to the applicant. This award was first established in August 1981. The usual policy was that Soldiers already out of training would have had to buy the award themselves.
7. As an exception to the standard procedure of informing the applicant how to apply for, and buy, these awards on his own, it would be equitable to issue them to him now.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
___xx___ ___xx___ ___xx___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by authorizing him issuance of the Army Service Ribbon, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar.
2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his Honorable Discharge Certificate to show his rank as Specialist Four.
_______ _xxxx______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080007419
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080007419
5
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016373C070206
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was separated from active duty in pay grade E-4. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show additional Expert Marksmanship Badges. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012204
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012204 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record also confirms that the FSM held the rank of PFC at the time of his retirement from active duty, as evidenced by the DA Form 3713 completed during his retirement processing and DFAS pay records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011311C071029
The applicant requests, in effect, that his final separation document (DD Form 214), dated 19 January 1984, be corrected by adding an Achievement Medal for 1984, the 2nd Award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), an Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Hand Grenade Bar, and the Food Service Primary Technical Course he completed. However, the evidence of record fails to show the applicant was awarded an achievement medal by proper authority while serving on active duty. As a...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015032
The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his certified diesel mechanic certificate and to show that he was awarded the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge, with Rifle and Machinegun Bars (M-16 Rifle and M-60 Machinegun). The applicant states, in effect, that the certified diesel mechanic certificate and the Sharpshooter Marksman Qualification Badge, with Rifle and Machinegun Bars are not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015108
The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected to show his award of an Army Commendation Medal and his rank as corporal (CPL). The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not include his award of the Army Commendation Medal and lists his rank as specialist four (SP4) not as a CPL. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the Army Commendation Medal...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001193
He also requests that two awards of the Army Achievement Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, the Noncommissioned Officers Professional Development Ribbon, the National Defense Service Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar be added to this DD Form 214. Since the applicant was promoted to E-4 in the USAR in MOS 64C on 29 April 1985, one year after his release from active duty, there is no basis for amending items 4a, 4b, and 11 on his DD Form 214 for the period...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000956C071029
There is no evidence in the applicant’s current Army National Guard records or prior Regular Army records to show he qualified in any weapons other than the rifle and hand grenade as listed on his DD Forms 214. In pertinent part, it states that one overseas service bar is authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U. S. Service participating in Operation Iraqi Freedom from 19 March 2003 to a date to be determined. There is no evidence in the applicant’s...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018955
This form also shows that he completed 7 years, 8 months, and 16 days of creditable active military service. Accordingly, his chain of command initiated separation action against him for unsatisfactory performance. In order to justify correction of a military record, he must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021369
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information in the form of time lost, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions which would disqualify him for the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008308
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the Driver and Mechanic Badge with Driver Bar * the Basic Leadership School Ribbon, i.e., the Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon * the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 2. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement - Armed Forces of the United States) * DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record - Part...