Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007348
Original file (20080007348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        07 OCTOBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007348 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show all of the awards and decorations that he is authorized. 

2.  The applicant essentially states that he feels that he was awarded some medals but did not receive them.  

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 June 1970.  He completed basic and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).  He served in the Republic of Vietnam from 11 January 1971 to 29 October 1971, serving with the 8th Battalion, 4th Artillery.  On 17 February 1972, he was honorably released from active duty at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit in Lawton,OK.  He was ordered to active duty from the USAR on 24 May 1973, and was honorably released from active duty on 
7 September 1973.  The DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that was issued to him at the time of his release from active duty on 7 September 1973, which will simply be referred to as his 
DD Form 214 throughout the remainder of these proceedings, shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar, and the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.  On 1 June 1976, he was honorably discharged from the USAR.  

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  However, he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal by Headquarters, XXIV Corps General Orders Number 1550, dated 
22 October 1971 for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force from January 1971 to November 1971 while serving with the 8th Battalion, 4th Artillery.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 also does not show that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that at the time of the applicant’s assignment to the 8th Battalion, 4th Artillery, the battalion was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Orders Number 6, dated 1974.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal, but it does not show that he was awarded any bronze service stars to signify campaign participation credit.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and criteria concerning individual military awards.  Paragraph 2-13 contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal.  It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in.  Table B-1 contains a list of Vietnam campaigns, and it shows that during his assignment in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII campaign and the Consolidation I campaign.  


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his military records should be corrected to show all of the awards and decorations that he is authorized. 

2.  General orders awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal, but it is not listed on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal.

3.  General orders also awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to the 8th Battalion, 4th Artillery while the applicant was assigned to this battalion.  Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and to correct his military records to show this unit award.

4.  The applicant participated in two campaigns during his tour in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing the award of the Army Commendation Medal;

	b.  awarding him the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation; and

	c.  showing two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The Board wants to thank the applicant for the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his honorable service in arms.



      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007348



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007348



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014648

    Original file (20110014648.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that based on his military records, he should have been authorized the awards but they were never entered on his DD Form 214. Based on his service with the 4th Battalion, 60th Artillery while in Vietnam, he is also entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004784

    Original file (20110004784.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He further requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant's SSN during his active service was "xxx-xx-8xxx"; however, his DD Form 214 was issued with an incorrect SSN of "xxx-xx-0xxx." As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from Item 3 of his DD Form 214 the entry "xxx-xx-8xxx" and replacing it with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010329

    Original file (20080010329.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, absent evidence which conclusively proves, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, that he was treated by medical personnel for wounds or injuries as a result of hostile action, and that this treatment was made a matter of official record, regrettably, there is insufficient basis for awarding the Purple Heart to the applicant in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003929C070205

    Original file (20060003929C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 17 October 2006 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060003929 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requested correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. In the absence of authority for this award, the applicant may request award of the Army Commendation Medal under the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010535

    Original file (20080010535.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and fidelity...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004164C071029

    Original file (20070004164C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 4 July 1971 be amended to add the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Bronze Star Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with device 1960; the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Valorous Unit Award; the Presidential Unit Citation, and the Army Commendation Medal. There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013008

    Original file (20090013008.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in the applicant's records awarding him the Army Commendation Medal. The records show that during his active service from 30 October 1970 to 1 October 1974 he was awarded or was authorized the Bronze Star Medal and a third award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 with an effective...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002321

    Original file (20130002321.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018715

    Original file (20140018715.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years, but more than 1 year. There is no available evidence showing he is authorized any awards for his period of service in Germany. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009556

    Original file (20090009556.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 7th Battalion, 8th Artillery, it was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 1 July 1967 to 1 May 1968 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 17, dated 1969. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows that at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2nd Battalion, 32nd Artillery, it was cited for the following unit awards: a. Meritorious Unit...