Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007282
Original file (20080007282.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        16 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080007282


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests adjustment of his date of rank (DOR) to major to 30 April 2001.

2.  The applicant states the Special Selection Board should have used the promotion criteria for the 2001 Major Promotion Selection Board.  Based upon the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) his DOR to major should be 30 April 2001.

3.  The applicant provides:

	a.  Electronic mail date stamped 20 August 2003.

	b.  USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for USARC Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 19 August 2003.

	c.  Orders M-040-0052, Headquarters, 99th Regional Support Command, Coraopolis, PA, dated 9 February 2003, ordering him to active duty for 365 days on 10 February 2003.

	d.  Memorandum, US Army Reserve Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO, dated 14 August 2003, showing he was recommended for, but disqualified from promotion.


	e.  An unnamed, undated document (with enclosure) showing assignment information, including paragraph and line number, and position number.

	f.  Memorandum, US Total Army Personnel Command, St. Louis, MO, dated 7 August 2003, with subject:  Notification of Promotion Status.

	g.  Memorandum, Headquarters, US Army Reserve Command, Fort McPherson, GA, dated 27 August 2003, with subject:  Promotion as a Reserve Officer of the Army.

	h.  Memorandum from applicant to President, DA Selection Board, dated 15 June 2007, requesting a Special Selection Board for promotion to major.

	i.  Memorandum, US Army Human Resources Command, Alexandria, VA, dated 10 March 2008, announcing the applicant's selection for promotion to major by a DA Standby Advisory Board (STAB) using 2002 Major Promotion Selection Board criteria.  The STAB recessed on 28 September 2007.  The applicant's DOR was established as 30 April 2001.

	j.  Orders B-03-801952, US Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, dated 26 March 2008, promoting the applicant to major effective 19 June 2002 with a DOR of 19 June 2002.

	k.  Various documents establishing his dates of rank as a second lieutenant, first lieutenant, and captain.

	l.  Active duty orders and DD Forms 214 for active duty service.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed as a US Army Reserve (USAR) second lieutenant on 28 May 1989.  He was promoted to first lieutenant on 28 November 1991, and he was promoted to captain on 1 May 1994.  He is currently serving on active duty as a USAR major.

2.  The applicant was on the Active Duty List (ADL) and served on active duty from 28 November 1989 through 1 March 2002.  In 2001, an Army Competitive Category Promotion Selection Board reviewed his file for promotion to major.  Unfortunately, he was not selected for promotion, but was selected for continuation on active duty as a captain.  He declined and was separated on 1 March 2002.

3.  The applicant was transferred to a USAR troop program unit and placed on the Reserve Active-Status List (RASL).  Unfortunately because of his late reversion to the RASL, he was not considered by the 2002 Major Promotion Selection Board, which was the first board for which he would have been eligible.

4.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, DA Promotions, US Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis.  It states time-in-grade from captain to major is 7 years, making his promotion eligibility date to major 30 April 2001.  It also provides the following facts in support of the applicant's DOR as a major:

	a.  He was not placed on the RASL until almost 1 year after his promotion eligibility date – he was non-select for promotion to major from the ADL.

	b.  He was considered and selected by the first available board following his return to the RASL – the 2003 Major Promotion Selection Board – and he was given a DOR and effective date of 20 August 2003.

	c.  In 2007, he requested and was granted a Special Selection Board based upon the criteria for the 2002 Major Promotion Selection Board.  He was selected using the 2002 criteria and the US Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis gave him a DOR of 30 April 2001, but added the caveat that, under ROPMA, the earliest DOR possible is the date the Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) approves the promotion board results.  The SECDEF approval date was 19 June 2002, which became his DOR and effective date of promotion to major.

5.  The applicant was provided an opportunity to respond to the advisory opinion, but did not do so.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions) prescribes the officer promotion function of the active duty military personnel system.  It supports the objectives of the Army's officer promotion system, which include filling authorized spaces with the best qualified officers.  It also provides for career progression based upon recognition of an officer's potential to serve in positions of increased responsibility.  Additionally, it precludes promoting the officer who is not eligible or becomes disqualified, thus providing an equitable system for all officers.

7.  Army Regulation 135–155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers) prescribes policy and procedures used for selecting and promoting commissioned officers (other than commissioned warrant officers) of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and 

of commissioned and warrant officers (WO) of the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  This regulation supports the objectives of the Army’s officer promotion system that provides for career progression based on recognition of an officer’s potential to serve in positions of increased responsibility.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests a DOR as a major earlier than 30 April 2001.

2.  The applicant is a USAR officer who has served on active duty and who has been subject to both ADL promotion policies and RASL promotion policies.  While on active duty he was passed over for promotion to major by the 2001 Army Competitive Category Promotion Selection Board.  He chose to separate from active duty on 1 March 2002 and return to a USAR TPU assignment.

3.  Once back in the USAR, he fell under RASL promotion policies and he was selected for promotion to major under the criteria for the 2002 Major Promotion Selection Board, the earliest board under which he could have been considered. His DOR was established as 19 June 2002, which was the earliest date possible.

4.  The US Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis advisory opinion recommended denying the applicant's request, and showed that he received the earliest DOR possible under the circumstances.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  __X_____  __X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



															XXX
      _______ _   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007282



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080007282



5


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050016259C070206

    Original file (20050016259C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant initially requested, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he remained on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) when he was ordered to active duty on 1 May 2002; and that he be considered for promotion to lieutenant colonel (LTC) by a Special Selection Board under Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) criteria. The applicant's contention that he should have been retained on the RASL at the time he was ordered to active duty under the provisions of 10 USC...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016280

    Original file (20090016280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank (DOR) to captain as 1 October 1997. This regulation specifies that an officer serving in the grade of first lieutenant on the ADL who has been selected for promotion to captain but who has not been promoted by the time the officer transfers to the reserve active status list (RASL) in the same competitive category, will be placed on an appropriate Reserve of the Army promotion list. Based on his DOR to captain his PED...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063242C070421

    Original file (2001063242C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At that time, he discovered that his active duty promotion list status should have been carried over to the USAR, but he was advised to continue with the Reserve Component (RC) promotion board process until he became a CPT and attempt to change his promotion date after he was selected for promotion. He further comments that he was considered and not selected for promotion by a RC board in 1999, because the necessary educational documentation was not in his record. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009353C070208

    Original file (20040009353C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he was selected for promotion to captain while on active duty and he would have been promoted to captain on 1 January 2002. It noted he had been selected for promotion to captain while on active duty but before he was promoted he transferred to the IRR. The effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the same as if the officer had been selected to the same grade by a promotion board for RASL officers.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016197

    Original file (20060016197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of CPT, effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2005. The applicant adds, in effect, that the Reserve Support Command should be able to confirm another person was assigned as the MP Platoon Leader and that he was assigned as the Operations Officer (i.e., a captain's position) from 16 July 2001 through 9 February 2003. Chief, Office of Promotions, RC, USA HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, effect necessary action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075956C070403

    Original file (2002075956C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The effective date of promotion and DOR shall be the same as if the officer had been selected to the grade concerned by the promotion board for RASL officers. The effective date of promotion and DOR shall be the same as if the officer had been selected to the grade concerned by the promotion board for RASL officers. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for promotion to CPT by an active duty Promotion Board and placed on the active duty Promotion Standing List...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004103311C070208

    Original file (2004103311C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides a Department of the Army, memorandum, dated 31 May 2000; an INARNG letter of recommendation for promotion; a DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile), dated 23 April 2001; a letter to a United States Senator, dated 1 July 2002; a letter of timeline of events, dated 15 November 2003; a copy of National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 55 AR, dated 4 March 2003; and two email messages. There is no evidence in the available records that show the applicant was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004514C070206

    Original file (20050004514C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, promotion to captain in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) under the 2000 criteria, with entitlement to back pay and allowances, or promotion consideration to captain by a USAR special selection board (SSB) under the 2000 criteria. The opinion also stated that the applicant was considered and selected for promotion to captain by the FY 2004 Captain, Army Promotion Selection Board that recessed on 21 November 2003. Since there is no basis to consider...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009117C070208

    Original file (20040009117C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Total Army Personnel Center (TAPC) Orders Number 14-040, dated 14 January 1998, included the applicant's name on the list of active duty officers promoted with an effective date of promotion and date of rank of 1 February 1998. The effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the same as if the officer had been selected to the same grade by a promotion board for RASL officers. Since by regulation this factor will not disqualify an officer from being promoted it is appropriate to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011614

    Original file (20080011614.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on the required completion of 7 years time in grade, his promotion eligibility date for major was 6 April 2002. It also advised that his records did not indicate that he had completed the required civilian and/or military education by the day the board convened and he should be considered for promotion next year. Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for Assignment to AMEDD Branches), paragraph 1-7 of this regulation specifies that requests for waiver...