Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006807
Original file (20080006807.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  17 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006807 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of separation from active duty be corrected to 25 September 1964.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) indicates he was separated from active duty on 12 June 1964 not on the actual date of his separation, 25 September 1964.

3.  The applicant provides copies of an Honorable Discharge Certificate, his DD Form 214, a statement from a former Congressman, a letter of support from his wife, and a letter of support from a friend and neighbor. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant entered active duty on 10 September 1962, completed training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 140.07 (Field Artillery Basic).  The applicant also completed Airborne Training and was awarded the Parachutist Badge.

3.  Headquarters, 8th Infantry Division Special Orders Number 49, dated 10 February 1964, authorized the applicant 30 days leave and to use military  transportation from his duty station in Germany to his home in North Carolina.

4.  On 21 March 1964 the applicant requested a hardship discharge due to family financial and health problems.

5.  A 6 April 1964 message granted the applicant emergency leave pending a final decision on his application for a hardship discharge.

6.  A 10 June 1964 DA Form 664 (Serviceman's Statement Concerning Application for Compensation for the Veterans Administration) shows that the applicant was pending separation at this time.

7.  Headquarters, XVIII Airborne Corps and Fort Bragg Special Orders Number 129, dated 10 June 1964, released the applicant from active duty on 12 June 1964 and transferred him to the Army Reserve (USAR).

8.  The applicant's DA Form 24 (Service Record) shows that he applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR on 12 June 1964.

9.  The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the USAR on 12 June 1964.

10.  The applicant's DD Form 214 lists his dates of service as from 12 September 1962 through 12 June 1964.  He had completed 1 year, 9 months, and 3 days of creditable service.

11.  The available record contains copies of inquires, dated between 9 October 1964 and 7 December 1964, from the Employment Security Commission, North Carolina written to the Army inquiring about the applicant's dates of active duty.  The dates of service listed on the forms are from 12 September 1962 through 
12 June 1964.

12.  A 26 November 1985 request for military service data from the United States District Court, Federal Probation Service lists the applicant's dates of service as from 12 September 1962 through 12 June 1964.

13.  A 28 March 2008 letter from H____ R____ K____, a former Congressman, states that he remembers the applicant and his father and that he assisted in getting the applicant a hardship separation in August of 1964.

14.  The applicant's wife states that she knows that her husband was released from active duty on 25 September 1964 because it was the day after their anniversary.  She states that the applicant was serving in Germany when their family situation deteriorated.  The applicant was given 30 days of emergency leave to come home and help her and was then assigned to Fort Bragg.  While at Fort Bragg he served on duty picking up Soldiers who were AWOL (absent without leave) and on one occasion was able to stop by their home on return from picking up an AWOL Soldier.  She recalls that the applicant did not receive any of his separation paperwork for over a year after his separation.

15.  A neighbor of the applicant's who has known the applicant since he was 6 years old states that she recalls that the applicant was released from active duty around the middle to late in the month of September 1964.  As a widow of a former Soldier with two sons who also served in the Army, she has experienced problems with lost records and asks that the Board believe the applicant and his records be corrected.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Notwithstanding the personal statements submitted on behalf of the applicant, there is no official documentation showing the applicant was still on active duty after 12 June 1964.

2.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X ___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




 _   _______   ______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006807



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006807



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002904

    Original file (20150002904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records contain his DA Form 24 (Service Record). He was given a dishonorable discharge pursuant to a general court-martial empowered to adjudge such a discharge. His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable laws and regulations and his discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030135

    Original file (20100030135.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the injuries he sustained in a motorcycle accident on 29 May 1962 be determined to have been incurred in the line of duty (LOD). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 23 June 1962, the appointing authority disapproved the IO's findings stating...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003685

    Original file (20140003685.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) of her late husband, a former service member (FSM), to show his social security number (SSN) as "3XX-4X-2XXX" instead of "2XX-3X-9XXX" and that he served in Vietnam. His military records contain the following: * DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 23 February 1962, which does not list his SSN * DA Form 41 (Record of Emergency Data),...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000548

    Original file (20140000548 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests remission/cancellation of her Specialized Training Assistance Program (STRAP) debt. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant her request. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000548 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000548 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008740

    Original file (20080008740.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show his service in the Dominican Republic in 1965 and his awards of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), the Combat Infantryman Badge, and any other awards he is entitled to as a result of his service in the Dominican Republic. Additionally, the evidence of record shows that the applicant was entitled to award of the NDSM and it appears that he should have been awarded the GCMDL for the period of 20 June 1962 to 18 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004254C070208

    Original file (20040004254C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 05 APRIL 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004254 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Jeanette McCants | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The National Defense Service Medal is awarded for honorable active service for any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150010420

    Original file (20150010420.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence of – * any adverse or derogatory information related to insulting/anti-Semitic comments by his raters/indorsers/reviewers/commanders * an erroneously reported/charged period of leave * being officially recommended for or – * promoted to CPT * awarded the – * Legion of Merit * Bronze Star Medal * Order of Merit * award of any individual foreign decoration 17. There is no evidence of record that shows he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001303

    Original file (20110001303.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 1 June 1967, the separation authority approved the recommendation to discharge the applicant from the Army under the provisions of section VI of Army Regulation 635-206 and directed the issuance of an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. On 5 June 1967, the applicant was accordingly discharged. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of section VI of Army Regulation 635-206, due to conviction by a civil court and he was issued an Undesirable Discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006283

    Original file (20090006283.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 December 1962, the applicant's immediate commander recommended that the applicant be eliminated from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208 (Personnel Separations) by reason of unfitness and be furnished an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. After carefully considering all the evidence in his case, the board unanimously found that the applicant was unfit for further military service and recommended that he be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation...