Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006803
Original file (20080006803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 
		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       23 October 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006803 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the divorced widow, requests that the records of the deceased former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that she is the designated beneficiary under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).    

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that, after the FSM's death in 2007, she and their children were going through his effects.  They discovered a June 1984 letter from the Army, stating, in effect, that the SBP was being terminated because she was deceased and that the SBP premium would be refunded to the FSM.  They have subsequently been unable to re-locate that document.  She wants to know how she could have been removed as the SBP beneficiary without proof that she was deceased.   

3.  The applicant provides copies of the designation of her daughter [who signed the DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Records] as attorney in fact for the purposes of this case; a marriage certificate; a sworn statement from her son; the FSM's 16 September 2007 death certificate; and his military retiree identification card.     

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted the Regular Army in November 1954 and retired in November 1974 as a staff sergeant.

3.  Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) records show that the applicant was the designated SBP beneficiary from the date of the FSM's retirement until their divorce in 1994.  

4.  There is no provision in the divorce decree reserving the applicant's rights as a former spouse beneficiary under the SBP. 

5.  Public Law 97-252, the Uniformed Services Former Spouses Protection Act (USFSPA), dated 8 September 1982, established SBP for former military spouses.  This law also decreed that state courts could treat military retired pay as community property in divorce cases if they so chose.  It established procedures by which a former spouse could receive all or a portion of that court settlement as a direct payment from the service finance center.  The USFSPA contains strict jurisdictional requirements.  The State court must have personal jurisdiction over the FSM by virtue of the FSM’s residence in the state (other than pursuant to military orders), domicile in the State, or consent.

6.  Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

7.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1448(b)(3) incorporates the provisions of the USFSPA relating to the SBP.  It permits a person to elect to provide an annuity to a former spouse.  Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce.  The member must disclose whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by the member as part of a proceeding of divorce.


8.  Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce.  Section 1450(f)(3)(C) provides that an election may not be deemed to have been made unless the request from the former spouse of the person is received within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Current law provides spouses involved in divorce proceedings with powerful rights to preserve their SBP beneficiary status.   

2.  There is no available evidence that the 1994 divorce decree granted or preserved the applicant any rights as an SBP beneficiary.     

3.  Given that the DFAS and not the Army administers the SBP and that the applicant's status as the SBP beneficiary endured until 1994, it is impossible to even conjecture exactly what the reported June 1984 letter from the Army might have been about. 

4.  Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence that would warrant granting the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ____X__  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





      _______ _ X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080008603



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006803



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019867

    Original file (20100019867.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. It would now be appropriate to correct the injustice by showing the applicant requested a deemed election of the SBP under the terms of the divorce decree within 1 year of the divorce in 1994. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024481

    Original file (20110024481.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her earlier request for correction of her deceased former husband's records, a former service member (FSM), to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from spouse to former spouse. The applicant states: a. she now provides a notarized statement from the FSM's widow renouncing her right to an SBP annuity as indicated in the "Discussion and Conclusions" section of the original Record of Proceedings; and b. contrary to the Army Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023708

    Original file (20100023708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record is void of any indication the FSM complied with the divorce decree to maintain SBP coverage for the applicant as "former spouse" and there is no indication the applicant requested a deemed election for SBP coverage within 1 year of the divorce. DFAS records show the FSM's SBP coverage designation at the time of his death was still "spouse only" and the FSM's widow is now the legal beneficiary of the SBP annuity. Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 73, provides that a spouse loses...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017236

    Original file (20100017236.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity and life insurance policy. The FSM's records at DFAS show the FSM married Dawana on 16 December 1995. Therefore, in the event of the FSM's death, any SBP benefits would have to be paid to the beneficiary in effect at the time of death, his spouse, not his former spouse, if they had been married for at least...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011733

    Original file (20140011733.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the records of her deceased former husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "spouse" to "former spouse" within 1 year of his divorce and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. However, the FSM's pay records do not reflect receipt of the former spouse election from the FSM nor did DFAS receive a deemed election request from the applicant within one year of the divorce. When the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020032

    Original file (20110020032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 7 July 1989, the FSM completed a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel) and elected to participate in the SBP for spouse and dependent children coverage at the full amount. The applicant provided a letter from DFAS in which she was informed that she was not entitled to receive an annuity under the SBP because the FSM's military retired pay record reflected he did not make a request to change his election to former spouse coverage nor was a deemed election for former...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006992

    Original file (20120006992.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record shows the FSM elected SBP spouse and dependent children coverage upon retirement. The evidence clearly shows the FSM's and applicant's divorce decree stipulated the applicant would remain the beneficiary of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004681

    Original file (20090004681.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows that prior to his retirement in 1977, the FSM elected full SBP spouse coverage. However, there is no indication that the FSM submitted the necessary forms to change his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" within one year of the divorce. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he changed his SBP coverage from "spouse" coverage to "former spouse" coverage" within one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001287

    Original file (20110001287.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of the record of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show she is entitled to a Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election. The evidence of record does not support the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003935

    Original file (20140003935.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the former spouse of a retired and now deceased former service member (FSM), requests correction of her former husband's records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for former spouse and payment of the SBP annuity based on his death. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage without the member's agreement in those cases where the retiree had elected spouse coverage at retirement or was still serving on active...