Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006724
Original file (20080006724.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006724 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show he was discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 21 June 1996, the date of his completion of his military obligation instead of 27 December 2001.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, his records currently show his membership in the USAR was terminated effective 27 December 2001 upon his acceptance of an appointment as a first lieutenant in the Ohio Army National Guard (OHARNG). 
He states he was not aware he was still assigned to the USAR after 21 June 1996 as evidenced by his negative response to the question concerning being a current member of any component of the Armed Forces on his application for Federal Recognition.  He states this date leaves him 15 months short of being able to complete 20 years of active service prior to his mandatory retirement date (MRD).

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his discharge orders, orders for release from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement), orders for release from active duty while attending the U.S. Military Academy (USMA), and his application for Federal Recognition in support of his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military personnel record shows he completed 11 months 
and 2 days of active service from 29 July 1984 to 30 June 1985.  He was released from active duty to enter the USMA.

3.  On 24 May 1989, the applicant graduated from the USMA and was appointed a second lieutenant in the Regular Army (RA).

4.  On 1 June 1993, the applicant was discharged from the RA in the rank of first lieutenant due to a reduction in authorized strength.  He had completed 4 years and 8 days of active service that was characterized as honorable.

5.  The applicant's discharge orders, dated 31 March 1993, shows the applicant was assigned to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) until 21 June 1996 for completion of his USAR obligation.

6.  There is no record of the applicant's appointment in the USAR.

7.  There is no record the applicant resigned, requested discharge, or was relieved from the USAR.

8.  On the applicant's application for Federal Recognition, dated 19 November 2001, he indicated he was not presently a member of any component of the Army Forces.

9.  The applicant took the Oaths of Office as a first lieutenant in the OHARNG on 27 December 2001.

10.  U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (now known as Human Resources Command [HRC]), St. Louis, Missouri, Orders C-03-207608 released the applicant from the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement) effective 27 December 2001.

11.  On 29 December 2004, the applicant completed a period of 10 months and 20 days of active service in the grade of captain.

12.  On 7 July 2005, the applicant was ordered to full time National Guard Duty in an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) status in the grade of captain effective 16 July 2006 and continues to service in that status.

13.  Title 10, United States Code, Section 12203 provides that appointments of Reserve personnel in commissioned grades are for an indefinite term and are held during the pleasure of the President.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been discharged from the USAR on 21 June 1996.

2.  The applicant's record shows continuous service since his appointment as a second lieutenant in the RA on 24 May 1989.

3.  Without evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that effective the day he was discharged from the RA, the applicant accepted an appointment in the USAR to complete his military service obligation.  Although his military obligation was completed on 21 June 1996, an appointment in the commissioned grades in the USAR are for an indefinite term unless the officer resigns, requests discharge, or is relieved for cause.  

4.  There is no evidence the applicant requested discharge or resigned his commission upon completion of his military obligation on 21 June 1996.  

5.  In view of the above, the applicant's effective date of release from the USAR is correct.

6.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.

7.  It is noted that a change to dates of discharge that brings about a period wherein there is no military status (i.e. broken service) may result in the adjustment of an individuals pay entry base date.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X__  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006724



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006724



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009171

    Original file (20120009171.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was transferred to the USAR Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) effective 2 March 1993 to complete his 8-year obligation and should therefore have been separated from the IRR effective 14 May 1996. In a memorandum, dated 24 April 2012, the Iowa ARNG stated its full support of the applicant's request for correction of his separation from the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provided none to show he resigned or requested to be separated from the IRR upon the completion of his MSO or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016055

    Original file (20090016055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his last DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report); a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report); promotion orders to first lieutenant; United States Army Infantry Center Orders (corrected copy) 174-6218; a 1st Battalion, 5th Field Artillery Memorandum for Record; a 24th Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS recommendation for award of the Combat Action Badge and award letter;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000832

    Original file (20110000832.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that: * in 1993 he was transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve * in 1996 and 1998 his military record was submitted to the Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB) for consideration for promotion to captain * he was passed over both times due to non-completion of the Officer Advanced Course * he enlisted in the Arizona Air National Guard (AZANG) and served from November 1996 to 1999 * he was not eligible for promotion to captain in May 1998 3. An advisory opinion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015856

    Original file (20080015856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The orders specify that the applicant has an MSO through 17 December 2009 and that an Oath of Office for Reserve appointment would be executed at the time of his discharge. Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfers and Discharges) states, in pertinent part, that an officer who requests resignation before completing the 8-year MSO must agree to accept an indefinite appointment the USAR to complete such service obligation. The orders clearly specify that he had an MSO through 17 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000558

    Original file (20060000558.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected and he receive service credit and retirement points for his period of service as a cadet at the United States Military Academy (USMA). A 13 December 1985 DA Form 1506 (Statement of Service - For Computation of Length of Service for Pay Purposes) indicates the applicant had 13 days credit for service under DEP; 1 year, 5 months, and 7 days active duty enlisted service; 3 years, 10 months, and 21 days as an USMA cadet; and that he had been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004102698C070208

    Original file (2004102698C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    NGB further stated that the applicant was discharged from the Army on 18 October 1977 and that, on 5 October 1977, he received appointment as a Reserve commissioned officer with an effective date of 19 October 1977. The NGB opinion stated that the applicant completed an application for Federal Recognition on 11 November 1979 and that he indicated that he was in the USAR from 18 October 1977 until the "present." The applicant's service personnel records contain a Department of the Army,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010297

    Original file (20070010297.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The earliest date of rank (DOR) he would have been eligible for was 31 March 2004, based on the commissioned date for ROTC graduates for May and June 2002. the Chief further stated that if the applicant provides a copy of his initial appointment letter, it is recommended that his DOR be changed to 31 May 2004. It states, in pertinent part, that an officer’s promotion is automatically delayed (that is, the officer is not promoted in spite of the publication of promotion orders) when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013866

    Original file (20140013866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Table 2-1, Rule 3, provided that for Regular Army commissioned officers who were discharged (including those who resigned their commission) and accepted appointment in the USAR, the entry in Item 9 would show the officer was assigned to the USAR CON GP (Annual Training or Reinforcement, as appropriate); and c. for Item 23, enter the appropriate term (REFRAD, Discharge, Retirement, REFRAD and Order to Active Duty in Another Status, Release from Active Duty for Training (ADT), Release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021952

    Original file (20100021952.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to CPT/O-3 in the USAR on 26 May 1993. The record is void of documentation showing he was notified that he had completed his military service obligation. The regulation also states an officer in the rank/grade of CPT/O-3 who has completed his statutory military service obligation will be discharged for failing to be selected for promotion after a second consideration by a Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017746

    Original file (20140017746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's appointment letter is filed in his OMPF. Army Regulation 135-100 (ARNG and Army Reserve – Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army) provides that commissioned officers twice passed over for promotion or otherwise released from an active status due to failure to be promoted to a higher commissioned grade are not eligible for another appointment unless a waiver is authorized. The applicant is seeking an appointment as a commissioned officer in the MSARNG;...