Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006599
Original file (20080006599.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  13 August 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006599 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be considered for promotion by the March 2005 Active Duty List (ADL) major promotion board.

2.  The applicant states that he was not considered by the March 2005 promotion board because his date of rank was incorrect.  He explains that he reentered active duty after a 10-year break in service and was told that his date of rank (DOR) would be adjusted at a later date.  The delay in correcting his DOR, along with the high tempo of activity during the time and being given command of a company, resulted in him not being able to go to the Military Police (MP) Officer Advanced Course earlier.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his military records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant’s military records show that he was commissioned in the Regular Army on 4 June 1983.  He was awarded the area of concentration of armor officer and was promoted to 1st lieutenant.  He was honorably released from active duty on 17 March 1987 and transferred to a U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) unit.

2.  He was promoted to captain, USAR, on 15 August 1988.

3.  On 13 February 1992, the applicant submitted an unqualified resignation from the USAR.  Based upon his request, the applicant was discharged from the USAR on 23 March 1992.

4.  On 15 May 2002, the applicant was commissioned as a captain, USAR.  He was assigned to a USAR troop program unit (TPU). 

4.  On 23 June 2006, the applicant completed the 2-week resident MP Officer Advanced Course.

5.  The applicant was promoted to major, USAR, effective 13 June 2007.

6.  On 12 January 2008, the applicant was ordered to 400 days of active duty as a member of his USAR unit.

7.  In the processing of this case an advisory opinion was obtained from the Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL).  The HRC-STL states that if the applicant were to be scheduled for a special selection board, he would not be educationally qualified and there would be no officer evaluation reports (OERs) eligible to be seen by the board.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion and responded that whatever the Board decides and whatever is recommended for the Board is fine.  He adds that he is glad he could adjust his DOR to captain, and to adjust his DOR to major would be “icing on the cake.”

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant states that the delay in correcting his DOR, along with the high tempo of activity during the time and being given command of a company, resulted in him not being able to go to the Military Police (MP) Officer Advanced Course earlier.  This resulted in him not being considered by the 2005 USAR Major Promotion Board.

2.  However, the applicant has not submitted any documentation to show what actions he took to correct his DOR, what delayed the correction to his DOR, or what operational necessities precluded him from going to the MP Officer Advanced Course. 

3.  Reservists not on active duty must balance their duties in their units, their civilian occupations, their home life, and the schools required for promotion.  Understandably, it is not an easy task.  


4.  Without evidence to show that the applicant had some event which precluded him attending the 2-week MP Officer Advanced Course within the 3 years preceding his promotion eligibility to major, to grant his request would be giving him a benefit not afforded to others.

5.  As such, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006599



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006599



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020760

    Original file (20090020760.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of her records as follows: * Award of 8 years and 11 months of constructive service credit (CSC) in order to establish her promotion eligibility to major (MAJ) as March 2001 * Adjustment of her date of rank (DOR) as a MAJ to an appropriate date to put her in the zone for promotion to lieutenant colonel * Correction of her education error * Informing the U.S. Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003056C070205

    Original file (20060003056C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he believes that three officer evaluation reports (OER) ending on 28 June 1991, 25 September 1992 and 16 April 1993 were not properly reviewed by the appropriate promotion selections boards which resulted in his promotions being delayed. It provides, in pertinent part, that standby boards are formed to prevent an injustice to an officer or former officers who were eligible for promotion but whose records contained a material error when reviewed by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014250

    Original file (20090014250.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that on 30 April 2008, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) corrected his DOR to captain (CPT) from 25 June 1998 to 25 June 1997. ABCMR Docket Number AR20080000528, dated 29 April 2008, approved the applicant's request to adjust his DOR to CPT from 25 June 1998 to 9 June 1997, thereby making him eligible for promotion consideration to MAJ one year earlier. Therefore, in the interest of equity and justice, it would be appropriate to adjust the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016280

    Original file (20090016280.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his date of rank (DOR) to captain as 1 October 1997. This regulation specifies that an officer serving in the grade of first lieutenant on the ADL who has been selected for promotion to captain but who has not been promoted by the time the officer transfers to the reserve active status list (RASL) in the same competitive category, will be placed on an appropriate Reserve of the Army promotion list. Based on his DOR to captain his PED...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020071

    Original file (20080020071.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to the rank of major be adjusted from 19 July 2000 to 19 April 2006. He continues by stating that on 1 January 2002, he was honorably discharged in error as a captain from the United States Army Reserve (USAR) because he was twice non-selected for promotion to the rank of major due to not meeting the educational requirements for promotion. It is also noted that from the time the applicant accepted a Reserve commission in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020328

    Original file (20100020328.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 1 July 2003, the ABCMR granted him relief and directed correction of his records to show he was promoted to 1LT with an effective date and DOR of 31 March 1999 (2 years from his DOR as a 2LT). On 11 March 2009, by memorandum, an official at the Department of the Army (DA) Promotions, HRC-STL recommended disapproval of the applicant's request for promotion to CPT with a 2001 DOR and promotion to MAJ with a 2004 DOR. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013202

    Original file (20100013202.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that his name was scrolled and approved for appointment in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) by the Secretary of Defense prior to his discharge from the Regular Army, and that he was appointed in the USAR the day following his discharge from the Regular Army. Since there were administrative problems getting the applicant "scrolled" (approved by the Secretary of Defense) the advisory official recommends approval of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001688

    Original file (20090001688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the processing of this case, on 17 March 2009, a staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Human Resources Command, St. Louis (HRC-STL), which explains that the applicant's DOR as a Reserve Component (RC) MAJ was 3 April 1998, which made him eligible for promotion to the rank of LTC on 2 April 2005, based on the 7-year time in grade requirement. The applicant's orders specified that his DOR would be adjusted to the date he entered active duty, which directly affected his promotion...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040009117C070208

    Original file (20040009117C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Total Army Personnel Center (TAPC) Orders Number 14-040, dated 14 January 1998, included the applicant's name on the list of active duty officers promoted with an effective date of promotion and date of rank of 1 February 1998. The effective date of promotion and date of rank will be the same as if the officer had been selected to the same grade by a promotion board for RASL officers. Since by regulation this factor will not disqualify an officer from being promoted it is appropriate to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012955

    Original file (20100012955.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The delay in his promotion to CPT was addressed by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) which granted him relief in an earlier decision by adjusting his DOR as CPT to 1 March 2002. It appears he was deployed at the time (he was on active duty from 21 January 2003 through 7 July 2003) and the Tennessee ARNG made an election on his behalf to delay his promotion until 26 November 2005 with a stipulation that his name would remain on the promotion list for 3 years from the...