Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006566
Original file (20080006566.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  03 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006566 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect that he was released from active duty (REFRAD) and was transferred to a United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit on 30 June 2007. 

2.  The applicant states that he should have been REFRAD instead of being discharged because he signed an agreement to serve in a troop program unit (TPU) before his separation date and his separation orders were amended to reflect that fact.  However, his DD Form 214 shows that he was discharged with no further affiliation with the USAR. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 and a copy of his orders assigning him to a USAR unit in Mesa, Arizona. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 15 November 2000, the applicant entered into a 3-year Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) commitment at the College of William and Mary in which he agreed that he had an 8-year military service obligation upon appointment as an officer in return for tuition and educational fees up to an annual amount of $16,000.    

2.  He was commissioned as a USAR Signal Corps second lieutenant on 10 May 2003 and was ordered to active duty effective 30 June 2003 to complete his      4-year active duty commitment.  

3.  He completed his Signal Officer Basic Course and was transferred to Fort Huachuca, Arizona.  He was promoted to the rank of first lieutenant on 30 November 2004 and he deployed to Iraq for 13 months in April 2005.  He returned to Fort Huachuca and was promoted to the rank of captain on 1 July 2006. 

4.  On 28 March 2007, orders were published which directed the applicant’s discharge on 30 June 2007.  On 25 June 2007, those orders were amended to show that the applicant would be assigned to a USAR unit in Mesa, Arizona.

5.  On 30 June 2007, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 3-5, due to miscellaneous/
general reasons.  He had served 4 years and 1 day of total active service.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge does not reflect in block 9 (Command to Which Transferred), that he was transferred to the USAR unit in Mesa, Arizona.

6.  A review of the applicant’s record shows that on 26 March 2008, the applicant again accepted an appointment in the USAR as a Signal Corps captain to be effective 1 July 2007.

7.  Further review of his record shows that he had an exemplary active duty career and it is void of any derogatory information.  There is no evidence that the applicant submitted an unqualified resignation of his commission.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-24, Officer Transfers and Discharges, prescribes the policies and procedures governing transfer and discharge of Army officer personnel.  Paragraph 3-5 of that regulation, processing unqualified resignations, provides, in pertinent part, that normally resignations will not be accepted unless on the requested date of separation the officer has fulfilled his/her military service obligation (MSO).  An officer must serve in the Armed Forces until completion of statutory MSO.  REFRAD under Chapter 2 of this regulation does not terminate an MSO.  An officer has an 8-year MSO and to waive an officer’s MSO, the Assistant Secretary of the Army (ASA) for Manpower and Reserve Affairs (M&RA) must find that the officer has no potential for service under conditions of full mobilization.

9.  Chapter 2 of that regulation governs the REFRAD of Reserve Component Commissioned and Warrant Officers.  Paragraph 2-7 provides the rules for processing the voluntary release from active duty due to expiration of active duty commitment.  It provides, in pertinent part, that application for REFRAD must be submitted not earlier than 12 months and no later than 6 months before the desired release date.         
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that he should have been REFRAD instead of being discharged has been noted and appears to have merit.  

2.   The applicant has an 8-year MSO and he had a 4-year active duty commitment.  He completed his 4-year active duty commitment and prior to his discharge elected to join a USAR TPU.  This is indicative that the applicant believed that he was being voluntarily REFRAD due to completion of required active service.

3.  However, because he was discharged, his appointment as a commissioned officer was terminated, which resulted in his having to obtain another USAR commission in order to continue to serve.

4.  The evidence of record shows that there is no derogatory information in his record that would serve to support an unqualified resignation before completion of his MSO.  Therefore, it is reasonable to presume that he was improperly discharged and that he should have been REFRAD due to completion of required active service under the provisions of paragraph 2-7, Army Regulation 600-8-24, with a separation code of MBK.

5.  Additionally, his DD Form 214 should reflect his transfer to the 2nd Battalion, 363rd Training Support Battalion, 7334 East Ulysses Avenue, Mesa, Arizona 85212. 

BOARD VOTE:

__XXX __  __XXX__  __XXX__   GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by 
showing that he was released from active duty (vice discharged) under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 2-7 (vice 3-5) due to Completion of Required Active Service (vice Miscellaneous/General Reasons), that he was issued a separation code of “MBK” (vice KND) and that he was transferred to the 2nd Battalion, 363rd Training Support Battalion, 7334 East Ulysses Avenue, Mesa, Arizona 85212 upon his REFRAD.



      ___        XXX                ___
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006566



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006566



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013866

    Original file (20140013866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Table 2-1, Rule 3, provided that for Regular Army commissioned officers who were discharged (including those who resigned their commission) and accepted appointment in the USAR, the entry in Item 9 would show the officer was assigned to the USAR CON GP (Annual Training or Reinforcement, as appropriate); and c. for Item 23, enter the appropriate term (REFRAD, Discharge, Retirement, REFRAD and Order to Active Duty in Another Status, Release from Active Duty for Training (ADT), Release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010280

    Original file (20110010280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) appointment date as 16 June 2007 vice 7 January 2011 and his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) as 1 December 2003. He also states he executed an oath of office as a Reserve commissioned officer on 16 June 2007. He was appointed as a USAR officer on 16 June 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016055

    Original file (20090016055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his last DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report); a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report); promotion orders to first lieutenant; United States Army Infantry Center Orders (corrected copy) 174-6218; a 1st Battalion, 5th Field Artillery Memorandum for Record; a 24th Infantry Division, Fort Riley, KS recommendation for award of the Combat Action Badge and award letter;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060013131C071029

    Original file (20060013131C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract entered into by the applicant on 5 December 1994, specified, in Item 3-d, that the applicant would be obligated to serve two, three, or four years on active duty as a commissioned officer in the United States Army as prescribed by relevant Army regulations based on the needs of the Army, followed by service in the Reserve Components (RC) until the remainder of her 8-year MSO had been served. On 7 January 2001, upon completion of 4 years and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009899

    Original file (20080009899.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, he requests that the orders reassigning him to the Standby Reserve (Inactive) be revoked or a waiver granted so he could appear before the FY 2008 Army Reserve Judge Advocate General's Promotion Selection Board. Additional instructions included in those orders stated, "You will be discharged or transferred to the Retired Reserve (if eligible) one (1) year from the effective date of this order unless you provide the MSO election requesting to remain in the IRR." The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010297

    Original file (20070010297.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The earliest date of rank (DOR) he would have been eligible for was 31 March 2004, based on the commissioned date for ROTC graduates for May and June 2002. the Chief further stated that if the applicant provides a copy of his initial appointment letter, it is recommended that his DOR be changed to 31 May 2004. It states, in pertinent part, that an officer’s promotion is automatically delayed (that is, the officer is not promoted in spite of the publication of promotion orders) when the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100006982

    Original file (20100006982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * his initial discharge orders indicated he was assigned to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (IRR) with a terminal date of 9 May 2009 * these orders were subsequently rescinded but a copy was not provided to him until December 2009 * item 9 of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "NA" [not applicable]; however, in the remarks section (item 18) he is listed as subject to active duty recall, muster duty, and/or annual screening * these two items contradict each other...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017746

    Original file (20140017746.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's appointment letter is filed in his OMPF. Army Regulation 135-100 (ARNG and Army Reserve – Appointment of Commissioned and Warrant Officers of the Army) provides that commissioned officers twice passed over for promotion or otherwise released from an active status due to failure to be promoted to a higher commissioned grade are not eligible for another appointment unless a waiver is authorized. The applicant is seeking an appointment as a commissioned officer in the MSARNG;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070009589C080407

    Original file (20070009589C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show no break in service between the date he was released from active duty on 30 June 2006, and his entry into the United States Army Reserve (USAR); and that his records be placed before a Special Selection Board (SSB) for consideration for promotion to Major (MAJ) under the guidelines of the 2007 Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB). A United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017051

    Original file (20070017051.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests promotion to major (MAJ)/O-4 in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), effective 20 May 2007, based on his earlier selection for promotion to that grade prior to his separation from the Regular Army on 30 April 2007. The applicant’s records show that he was selected for promotion. Army Regulation 135-155 also states, in pertinent part, that an active duty officer, who is selected for promotion but removed from the ADL and placed in an active Reserve status prior to promotion,...