Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006507
Original file (20080006507.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 September 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006507 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, termination of his Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Debt.   

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he is currently paying off an Army ROTC scholarship he received in college.  However, he is now an active duty officer serving in the Navy, and he would like his ROTC debt terminated based on this service.   

3.  The applicant provides commissioning and promotion certificates in support of his application.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 19 September 2001, the applicant entered into an Army Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) Scholarship Cadet Contract (DA Form 597-3).  By signing the contract, he acknowledged his understanding of the conditions of the contract and that he concurred with them.  At the time the applicant entered into his ROTC contract, he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program, the Secretary of the Army or his designee could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier; or in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he could be required to repay financial assistance he received through the ROTC program, plus interest. 

2.  The applicant was disenrolled from the ROTC program based on his failure to enroll in ROTC classes for the Spring of 2002, and was given the option to either repay the debt monetarily, or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels based on the needs of the Army.  On 25 March 2002, after he was given these options, the applicant elected to make repayment in monthly installments rather than enter active duty.  At the time, a debt was established with the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) established a debt for the cost of his educational expenses paid on his behalf, which totaled $6,280.00. 

3.  On 30 January 2004, the applicant was commissioned an Ensign in the United States Navy (USN) and entered active duty in that status, and on 
1 February 2008, he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant.  

4.  During the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Deputy Chief of Staff (DCS), G1, United States Army Cadet Command (USACC). It states that the terms of the ROTC scholarship contract require a cadet either repay his debt monetarily, or agree to be ordered to active duty through ROTC channels based on the needs of the Army.  It further indicates the applicant was offered the option of being ordered to active duty, or repaying his ROTC scholarship debt at the time he was disenrolled from the ROTC program, and at that time, the applicant declined the offer of order to active duty and agreed to repay the debt monetarily in monthly installments.  In addition, the DCS, G1 states that the applicant's USN service is not an authorized remedy for debt repayment under the terms of his ROTC contract, and his actions should not eliminate his debt to the Government.  

5.  On 22 July 2008, the applicant responded to the USACC advisory opinion.  He stated that he thought that serving on active duty regardless of service would qualify him for debt forgiveness.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his active duty commitment with the USN should fulfill his obligation under his breached ROTC contract was carefully considered.  However, the applicant's ROTC contract called for an expeditious call to active duty through ROTC channels at the needs of the Army.  Nevertheless, in this case, the applicantÂ’s commissioning and active duty service commitment to the USN serves the same purpose as would have been served had he been ordered to active duty in the Army through ROTC channels.  


2.  The record shows that as a result of the applicantÂ’s active duty USN service, the Government is getting the benefits of his service for the same period he would have served had he been ordered to active duty as a result of breaching his ROTC contract.  

3.  In view of the facts of this case, it would be appropriate to consider his active duty service in the USN to have met the active duty obligation required by his ROTC scholarship contract as a matter of equity.  

BOARD VOTE:

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he has satisfied his ROTC scholarship debt of $6,280.00 under the original terms of the ROTC contract as result of his active duty service in the United States Navy; and that he be reimbursed any amount of the ROTC debt already collected.  




      _______ _x   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006507



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006507



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016722

    Original file (20090016722.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: self-authored statement; Board for Correction of Military Records letter, dated 5 October 2007; Headquarters, United States Army Cadet Command (USACC) memorandum, dated 27 August 2007; Cadet Record Brief; Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record; USACC Scholarship Recoupment Debt memorandum; USACC Disenrollment memorandum, dated 26 September 2006; Texas State Army ROTC memorandum, dated 3 June 2005; DA Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003559

    Original file (20080003559.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 September 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080003559 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. At the time the applicant entered into his ROTC contract, he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program, the Secretary of the Army or his designee could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier; or in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he could be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012278

    Original file (20080012278.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no indication on the applicant's enlistment contract, nor is there any other evidence of record, which shows that his enlistment in the USMC was for the purpose of fulfilling the obligation he incurred as a result of his being disenrolled from the ROTC program for breach of contract. The evidence of record shows that during the process of disenrolling the applicant from the ROTC program for breach of contract, he was afforded the opportunity to repay the debt monetarily or agree to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003301

    Original file (20070003301.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his Reserve Officer's Training Corps (ROTC) scholarship debt be forgiven based on his medical disenrollment from the program due to mental illness and asthma. The memorandum also informed the applicant of his obligation to satisfy the Army through active duty in an enlisted status or repayment of the cost of educational assistance provided by the Army, valued at $26,700.00 at that time. Notwithstanding the expert psychological evaluation conducted at Widener...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000314

    Original file (20090000314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant further acknowledged that she understood that her active duty would be contingent on the disenrollment proceedings and that if she were eligible to serve on active duty, the Cadet Command would approve her action, based on her request, ordering her to active duty as a private (PV1)/E-1 in the active Army for a period of 3 years. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army some 2 years after her disenrollment from the ROTC program for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012394

    Original file (20090012394.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 5 (Terms of Disenrollment) of the applicant's DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract) states that if the cadet were disenrolled from the ROTC program for any reason, the Secretary of the Army could order the cadet to reimburse the United States the dollar amount plus interest that bears the same ratio to the total cost of the scholarship financial assistance provided by the United States to the cadet as the unserved portion of active duty bears to the total...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011871

    Original file (20070011871.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    His voluntary enlistment in the USMC is not an authorized remedy for ROTC debt repayment under the terms of his ROTC contract. Further, he enlisted in the USMC some 14 months after his disenrollment from the ROTC program and is now serving on active duty with the USMC for a period of 4 years. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his ROTC scholarship contract to show that he would satisfy the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011395

    Original file (20070011395.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The USACC advisory opinion also states that the applicant's decision to breach his ROTC contract and enlist in the Army for 4 years was voluntary and not as a result of being ordered to active duty through ROTC channels in satisfaction of his ROTC contractual obligation. There is no indication on the applicant's enlistment contract, nor is there any other evidence of record, which shows that his enlistment in the Army was for the purpose of fulfilling the obligation he incurred as a result...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010446

    Original file (20080010446.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    At the time the applicant entered into his ROTC contract, he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program, the Secretary of the Army or his designee could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier; or in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he could be required to repay financial assistance he received through the ROTC program, plus interest. The applicant was also advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060011931

    Original file (20060011931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he is currently on active duty in the Army. The applicant provides DA Form 5315-E (US Army Advanced Education Financial Assistance Record); Army Senior Reserve Officers Training Corps Scholarship Cadet Contract; Addendum to Part I Scholarship Contractual Agreement; Headquarters, United Stated Army Cadet Command (USACC) memorandum, dated 6 April 2005, subject: Disenrollment from the U.S. Army ROTC Program; University of Virginia memorandum subject: Disenrollment of...