Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006406
Original file (20080006406.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	        06 NOVEMBER 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006406 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that in 1970, while he was in Quantri, South Vietnam, he was struck in the left side of his lower back by a small piece of metal from a rocket propelled grenade that went off beside his tank during a fire fight.  He states that he was treated by his company medic in the field and was not flown back to his base camp.  He states the company medic told him he was putting him in for the Purple Heart; however, he never received it.  He states that he has not put in for any military benefits in 37 years so he did not realize the importance of receiving the Purple Heart until now.  He states that he now has a heart problem and he is applying for benefits through the Department of Veterans Affairs.  He states that he is only trying to find out if there was any record of his injuries submitted.  He concludes by stating that he has been able to locate one person that was also wounded in the fire fight and that this individual recalls what happened.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application, a self-authored statement which provides his contentions; and an undated, self-authored statement repeating his contentions.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 5 March 1969, the applicant enlisted in the Army in Atlanta, Georgia, for 3 years, in the pay grade of E-1.  He successfully completed his training as an armor crewman.  He was transferred to Vietnam on 10 April 1970 and he was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 77th Infantry Regiment, 5th Infantry Division.

3.  A review of the applicant’s records does not show that he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in Vietnam.

4.  The applicant returned to the Continental United States on 17 March 1971 and he was assigned to Company B, 3rd Battalion School Brigade, Fort Knox, Kentucky.

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 27 December 1971, due to early separation for other good and sufficient reason, as determined by Headquarters, Department of the Army.  He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his Reserve obligation.  The DD Form 214 that he was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Bronze Star Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation with bronze service star.

6.  A review of the Vietnam Casualty Roster does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

7.  During the processing of this case, a member for the Board staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973.  This review failed to reveal any Purple Heart orders on file for the applicant.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  A review of the available records does not show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

2.  The Vietnam Casualty Roster does not contain his name to show he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army.

3.  The ADCARS also does not contain any orders to show he was awarded the Purple Heart.

4.  The applicant’s contentions have been noted.  However, he has provided no evidence that shows that he was wounded as a result of hostile action in July 1971 or August 1971.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that what the Army did in his case was correct.

5.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

6.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicants request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  ____X____  __X______  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________XXX______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006406



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006406



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007233

    Original file (20080007233.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: a. The Vietnam Casualty List shows that LT John B***er was killed in action on 2 May 1970 while serving as a platoon leader with Company B, 4th battalion, 31st Infantry; and c. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows that, on/about 30 April 1970, the applicant changed duty assignment from a rifleman to an RTO. Awarding him the Presidential Unit Citation by Department of the Army General Order Number 42, dated 1971; c. Deleting the Vietnam Service Medal from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017706

    Original file (20090017706.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) states that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was ever awarded any of the MOS's listed in Army Regulation 600-8-22 for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge during the Vietnam era. Based on the foregoing conclusions, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001284

    Original file (20140001284.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any evidence that shows he was entitled to the Purple Heart at any time during his active duty service. His record contains Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 14617, dated 9 November 1970, showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device for action on 8 September 1970 while at Landing Zone Stinson. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009480

    Original file (20080009480.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It should be noted that although he indicated that he is requesting reconsideration, this is his first application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) regarding award of the Bronze Star Medal and the Purple Heart. The applicant's military records also do not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Additionally, while the sincerity of the applicant's claim to entitlement to award of the Purple Heart is not questioned, there is no evidence in the available...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016385

    Original file (20110016385.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016860

    Original file (20130016860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with three oak leaf clusters (now known as 4th award), Purple Heart, and completion of the Combat Leaders Course. His record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) dated 20 August 2013, which shows his DD Form 214, dated 19 November 1971, was corrected to add the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018271

    Original file (20110018271.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. His official military record contains no evidence showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action while he was in the Army. _________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004821

    Original file (20110004821.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. The applicant's service record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart or that he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy hostile action. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014023

    Original file (20080014023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart. There are no orders in the applicant's military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart. However, by regulation, in order to support award of the Purple Heart, there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of or was caused by enemy action, that the wound was treated by medical personnel, and a record of this treatment must have been made a matter of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005252

    Original file (20090005252.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief of the Military Awards Branch stated, in effect, that the applicant’s official military records did not contain evidence to support the applicant’s request for award of the Purple Heart. A search of the Vietnam Casualty Report, his personnel record, or military medical record did not support awarding the applicant the Purple Heart as no injuries or wounds were sufficiently documented to support the applicant’s inquiry. In the absence of military and medical records showing that...