Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006172
Original file (20080006172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	       24 July 2008

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006172 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be granted Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) and in effect 20 years of service.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he completed 20 years and ten months for retirement.  

3.  The applicant provides a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter); a CRSC Reconsideration Request; a document pertaining to CRSC; a memorandum pertaining to a phone call on 19 June 2006 to CRSC; a letter, dated 16 May 2007, to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service; a NGB [National Guard Bureau] Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); and a DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 October 1969 for a period of 3 years.  He trained as a special equipment repair parts specialist and was honorably discharged on 18 August 1971.  He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 6 days of creditable active service.  

3.  Having prior service in the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted again in the Army National Guard on 21 February 1981.  He entered active duty on 
29 September 1986 in an Active Guard Reserve status.  On 27 January 1999, he voluntarily elected to be processed for retirement under the Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA).  On 31 July 1999, the applicant was retired from active duty in the rank of sergeant first class.  He was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard on 31 July 1999 and transferred to the Retired Reserve. 

4.  Orders, dated 5 February 1999, show the applicant completed 15 years and 
3 days of creditable service for his voluntary retirement and 20 years, 10 months, and 11 days of service for pay.  

5.  On 5 July 2006, the applicant received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter).

6.  The National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for Fiscal Year 2003 granted a special payment to certain disabled retirees - Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC).  The initial eligibility criteria was for a retired member who met each of four conditions to have been considered to meet the Preliminary CRSC Criteria, to include having 20 or more years of service in the Uniformed Services for the purposes of computing the amount of retired pay.  A retired Reserve with retired pay computed under the provisions of chapter 1223 of Title 10, U. S. Code, must have had 20 or more years of service as defined by Title 10, U. S. Code, section 12733.  Members retired under the TERA were not eligible unless the member had been recalled to active duty long enough to accumulate 20 years or more of service.  

7.  The NDAA for Fiscal Year 2008 was signed into law on 28 January 2008.  It expanded the eligibility of CRSC to include anyone receiving military retired pay. This includes TERA and Temporary Disability Retired List retirees.  These new eligible components for CRSC went into effect 1 January 2008.  Medical and TERA retirees must still provide documentation that shows a causal link between a current Department of Veterans Affairs disability and a combat-relate event.  

8.  To receive CRSC benefits, retirees must apply with their Branch of Service on a DD Form 2860.  The Service will determine which disabilities, if any, qualify as combat-related.  Additional information may be obtained by calling toll-free         1-866-281-3254 for additional information.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was never a retired Reserve.  He never drew Reserve retired pay.  He retired by reason of completing sufficient service for an active duty retirement.  However, since he retired under the TERA, with less than 20 years of active duty service, he was not eligible for CRSC under the initial eligibility criteria.

2.  However, he became eligible when the law changed effective 1 January 2008. He may reapply with his Branch of Service on a DD Form 2860 to receive CRSC benefits.  The Service will determine which disabilities, if any, qualify as combat-related.  Additional information may be obtained by calling toll-free 1-866-281-3254 for additional information.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___xx___  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.


      _______xxxx _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006172



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006172



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002043

    Original file (20070002043.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Fields Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show service-connected disability of 40 percent in item 18 (Remarks). For most eligible retirees, that phase-in period will end in 2014 with receipt of full retired pay and disability compensation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010463

    Original file (20140010463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * denial letter from HRC, dated 24 March 2014 * webpage from Military.Com explaining CRSC * printout showing eligibility requirements for CRSC * DD Form 2860 Test (Application for CRSC), dated 10 June 2014 * two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Order removing him from the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) and permanently retiring him * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-year letter) * service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006656

    Original file (20140006656.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states his request is based on major depressive disorder (not bipolar disorder, which the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) considered and denied in his original application). The Gulf War Illness and the Health of Gulf War Veterans, Findings in Brief, that the applicant provided in his original application was reviewed. The evidence of record shows the applicant requested correction of his records to show his disabilities are combat-related and his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010771

    Original file (20110010771.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, reversal of the decision to deny him combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On 6 July 2010, he filed a claim for CRSC based on his VA rating of 100-percent for depressive disorder. The applicant also provides a VA Rating Decision, dated 11 March 2004, wherein his service-connected disability of depressive disorder and PTSD, rated at 100-percent disabling, was considered permanent and total.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017382

    Original file (20080017382.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that if his honorable discharge is changed to a medical retirement he will meet the requirement for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The evidence of record does not support the applicant's contention that he had to be discharged from active duty in 1971 due to wounds received in Vietnam. There is no evidence to show that the applicant could not perform his duties while on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004932

    Original file (20110004932.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His complete service and/or VA medical records are not available for review with this case. The troop medic completed an SF 600 for both injuries but documentation did not remain in his permanent record despite follow on medical care for those injuries; d. MFR, dated 4 August 2009, stating he sustained chronic lumbar (low back), thoracic (mid back), cervical (neck), right and left knee, right and left should pain; high frequency hearing loss, and squarmous cell carcinoma of the tongue that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014328

    Original file (20080014328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 March 1997, an informal PEB considered and found the applicant unfit based on his chronic leg and back pain with S1 radiculopathy and degenerative disk disease. The PEB rated the applicant as 20 percent disabled for these conditions; his hypertension was found to be not unfitting. There is no evidence and the applicant provided none to show his unfitting conditions were incurred as a direct result of armed conflict.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005057

    Original file (20120005057.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 22 January 2010, the applicant completed his claim for CRSC in which he listed that his initial disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) was 10 percent. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018798

    Original file (20110018798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The 2 August 2011 HRC CRSC decision also indicates the certifying officer was unable to verify the following conditions as combat-related disabilities: VASRD* DESCRIPTION % JUSTIFICATION/COMMENTS 5252 Degenerative Joint Disease, Right Hip 10% Final disapproval – Previously requested : No new evidence to show combat-related event caused condition 5242 Lumbosacral Strain with Radic-ulopathy of Lower Extremities 10% Final disapproval – Previously requested : No new evidence to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002123

    Original file (20110002123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 January 2004 the Army Physical Disability Agency (CRSC) denied the applicant entitlement to CRSC due to the fact he did not have 20 qualifying years of service. It appears from the available records that the injury was considered an accident and this is borne out by the fact that he is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster and was not awarded the Purple Heart for the injury. Regrettably, in the absence of evidence that shows his injuries were the result of hostile action and not...