Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006112
Original file (20080006112.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080006112 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction to the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) former spouse coverage.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that SBP was given to her daughter and she was also entitled to 50 percent of his pay and SBP.  She also states that she was married to the FSM for 19 years and 7 months.  They divorced in 1983 and he died in 1984.  She further states, in effect, since she was married to her husband for over 10 years she should be entitled to 50 percent of SBP.  

3.  In support of her application, the applicant provides copies of her Marriage Certificate, her final divorce decree, the FSM's FCUSA Form 20-108 (Request for Information and/or Records on Election of Annuity Under Retired Serviceman's Family Protection Plan), her USAFAC Form 20-213 (Arrears of Pay Information), the FSM's Certification of Birth Registration, the FSM's Veteran's Administration Card, and the FSM's Death Certificate.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.   The applicant provides a copy of her Marriage Certificate that shows she and the FSM were married on 28 February 1964.

3.  The FSM's military records show he was appointed in the United States Army Reserve, as a second lieutenant, effective 6 October 1952, with prior enlisted service.  He entered active duty on 1 November 1966.  

4.  The FSM was separated from active duty, for the purpose of permanent retirement – by reason of physical disability, and transferred to the Retired Reserve, as a captain, effective 26 December 1968.  He was credited with over 24 years of active Federal service.

5.  The applicant also provides a copy of the FSM's FCUSA Form 20-108, dated 11 February 1969, wherein the Retired Pay Division, Finance Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, advised the FSM that he had elected Option I and that option provided for his wife only and did not include his daughter.   

6.  The applicant further provides copy of her final divorce decree that shows her and the FSM were granted a final divorce on 8 September 1983.  The divorce decree does not reference SBP coverage.  The decree does reference and incorporates a property settlement agreement.  However, that document was not included with the applicant's request and is not otherwise contained in the record.

7.  The FSM died on 14 June 1984 and his death certificate reflects that he was divorced at that time.  It is also noted that the applicant was listed as the informant.  

8.  The applicant also provides a copy of her USAFAC Form 20-213, dated 2 August 1984, wherein the Retired Pay Operations, US Army Finance and Accounting Center, Indianapolis, advised her that it had been determined she was eligible to receive 100 percent of unpaid retired pay due the FSM.  She was also advised that the check would include the SBP cost refund for spouse because of the divorce, and that a monthly annuity would be paid to her effective 13 June 1984, provided documentation was provided from school officials when her daughter started school at the beginning of each semester until she reached age 22.

9.  The applicant's daughter reached age 22 on 28 August 1988.

10.  On 22 July 2008, a staff member of the Defense Finance and Accounting Service, verified that former spouse SBP did not start until 24 September 1984 and the cost was at coverage for a natural insurable person.  Then on 1 March 1986, former spouse was changed to former spouse at spouse cost under the Former Spouse Protection Act.  The FSM died before the former spouse SBP coverage was authorized.  The applicant was eligible for the arrears of pay and the arrears of pay were paid to her.

11.  Public Law 87-381, the RSFPP, dated 4 October 1961, established election of an annuity of retired pay to family members of servicemen.

12.  Public Law 92-425, dated 21 September 1972, repealed the RSFPP and established the SBP.

13.  Public Law 94-496, dated 14 October 1976, suspended spouse SBP costs if the marriage ended in death or divorce.  

14.  Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established former spouse SBP coverage for retired members.  There was a one-year open enrollment from 24 September 1983 to 23 September 1984, in which a retired member could make a former spouse election.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows the FSM and the applicant married on 28 February 1964.  The FSM was released from active duty and transferred to the Retired Reserve on 26 December 1968.  Based on the FCUSA Form, dated 11 February 1969, it appears the FSM elected to provide the applicant, his current spouse at the time, a retired pay annuity.  The FSM and the applicant were divorced on 8 September 1983, prior to the establishment of SBP coverage for a former spouse.

2.  The FSM died on 14 June 1984.  There is no evidence that he attempted or intended prior to his death to establish former spouse coverage.  The evidence provided by the applicant and DFAS shows that the applicant received 100 percent of the FSM's unpaid retired pay and a partial refund of SBP cost for spouse since their marriage ended in divorce.  She was also advised that the FSM's daughter was eligible for a monthly annuity until she reached age 22, provided she submitted documentation to show her enrollment in and attendance at school.

3.  The applicant has not provided sufficient evidence of intent on the part of the FSM to provide her an annuity under the SBP as a "former spouse."  In fact, the law did not provide for this option when they divorced.  The only intent clearly proven is that he elected and intended to provide her an SBP annuity while she was his spouse.  The evidence shows that the applicant did not contest the refund of "spouse SBP costs" premiums that were refunded to her when the Army became aware that they had divorced and she was at the time a "former spouse."  The applicant received the refunded SBP costs upon the FSM's death in 1984.  

4.  The FSM could not have elected former spouse SBP election coverage because he died before this coverage was authorized and an available option.  Therefore, there is no legal basis to grant the applicant relief.  Unfortunately, she is not entitled to be granted SBP former spouse benefits. 

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x ____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006112



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080006112


4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158

    Original file (20110009158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000113C071029

    Original file (20070000113C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's Retiree Account Statement, with an effective date 2 December 2003 and with a new pay due date of 2 January 2004 shows he elected full SBP coverage (to provide a 55% annuity amount), for spouse only. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member's agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an election. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104787C070208

    Original file (2004104787C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that her mother (the FSM's former spouse) was married to the FSM for most of his military career. Public Law 99-661, dated 14 November 1986, permitted divorce courts to order SBP coverage (without the member’s agreement) in those cases where the member was participating in the SBP or was still on active duty and had not yet made an SBP election.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003719

    Original file (20090003719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 1 September 1979, the FSM authenticated a DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) that shows he was married, that he elected spouse only coverage, that he elected to provide an annuity based on the full amount of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014744

    Original file (20110014744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased former spouse, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage to former spouse coverage. DFAS informed the Board's staff their records indicated that the FSM and applicant divorced on 1 April 2003. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the FSM made a voluntary change in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341

    Original file (20080007341.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001313

    Original file (20090001313.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she was married to the FSM for 25 years, 18 of which were during his military service and that upon his retirement, he elected spouse coverage under the SBP. The applicant contends that the records of her former spouse should be corrected to show that her request for a deemed election of former spouse coverage under the SBP was timely received and properly processed by officials at DFAS. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005569

    Original file (20120005569.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel argues that: * T____ was the beneficiary of the SBP when the FSM retired through the date of the divorce; she was never deleted as the SBP beneficiary * The FSM made contact with DFAS and OPM to change the SBP designation to former spouse coverage; OPM complied but DFAS did not * The FSM believed no additional documentation was needed and as such, continued to pay monthly premiums until he was paid up * The Board has previously granted relief, directly or indirectly, in multiple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014270

    Original file (20140014270.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity election made by her deceased ex-spouse, a former service member (FSM), be changed to former spouse coverage and that she be provided an SBP annuity accordingly. Although it is unknown if the court ordered the FSM to make a former spouse SBP election, he paid the SBP/RCSBP premiums through the date of his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024111

    Original file (20110024111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 15 July 1977, the applicant and FSM completed a settlement agreement in the Superior Court for the County of Whitfield and State of Georgia which stipulated, in pertinent part, that the FSM currently made payments on an annuity contract (SBP) whereby a percentage of his monthly retirement pay from the United States Government would continue at his death unto the applicant and the minor children of the marriage. In view of the foregoing and given there is no current spouse beneficiary, it...