IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 13 November 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080006014
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the Purple Heart (PH) be added to his separation document (DD Form 214).
2. The applicant states, in effect, the PH was inadvertently left off his DD Form 214.
3. The applicant provides PH orders and a National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) letter in support of his application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants record shows that he was inducted into the Army and entered active duty on 8 May 1968. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).
3. The applicants Enlisted Qualification Record (DA Form 20) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 7 October 1968 through 14 September 1969. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows that during his RVN tour he was assigned to Company D, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment, performing duties in MOS 11B as an ammunition bearer and automatic rifleman. Item 38 also shows that he was a patient at the 106th General Hospital in Japan from
3 through 13 September 1969 and at Walter Reed Army Medical Center (WRAMC) from 14 September through 10 October 1969.
4. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicants DA Form 20 contains an entry that indicates he received a fragmentation wound to both legs on 26 August 1969. The PH is included in the list of awards contained in Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) and his record contains a copy of Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division General Orders (GO) 11888, dated 10 September 1969, which awarded the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 26 August 1969.
5. The applicants record also contains orders issued at Fort Lewis, Washington on 24 June, 21 August, and 29 August 1968, which show the applicant qualified as an expert with the M-60 machinegun and M-14 rifle and as a marksman with the automatic rifle.
6. On 7 May 1970, the applicant was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD), in the rank of sergeant, after completing 2 years of active military service. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: Bronze Star Medal, Air Medal, Army Commendation Medal, Army Good Conduct Medal, National Defense Service Medal, RVN Campaign Medal, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Combat Infantryman Badge, and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy. Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on award of the PH. It states, in pertinent part, that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that it required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.
8. Paragraph 2-13 of the awards regulation contains guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN.
9. Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) establishes the eligibility of individual members for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. It confirms that during his tenure of assignment in the RVN, the applicants unit (Company D, 2nd Battalion, 506th Infantry Regiment) received the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC), RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. It also shows that during the applicant's tenure of assignment in the RVN participation credit was granted for the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V; Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI; Tet 69 Counteroffensive, 1969; and Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 campaigns.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicants contention that the PH was erroneously omitted from the list of awards contained on his DD Form 214 was carefully considered and found to have merit. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was awarded the PH as a result of being wounded in action in the RVN on 26 August 1969, as evidenced by PH orders and an entry in Item 40 of the applicants DA Form 20. As a result, it would be appropriate to add the PH to the list of awards contained in Item 24 of his DD Form 214.
2. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant qualified as an expert with the M-14 rifle and M-60 machinegun and as a marksman with the automatic rifle, which entitles him to the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Machinegun Bars and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar. It further confirms that based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, he is entitled to the PUC, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and 4 bronze service stars with his VSM. Therefore, it would also be appropriate to add these awards and decorations to his separation document at this time.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ___x____ ___x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing his entitlement to the Purple Heart, Presidential Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, 4 bronze service stars with his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle and Machinegun Bars, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar and by providing him a correction to his separation document that includes these awards.
________x______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006014
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080006014
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018796
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 30 October 1967 through 7 July 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 22 May 1968; b. awarding...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000672C071029
Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart, for being wounded in action in the Republic of Vietnam on 31 January 1968; by awarding him the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014975
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). As a result, it would be appropriate to award the FSM the PH and correct his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the FSM the Purple Heart for wounds received in action in the RVN on 10 February 1970; b. awarding the FSM the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001764
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090001764 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF includes orders that awarded the applicant the BSM with "V" Device, PH, and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 12 June 1969 through 13 November 1970; b. amending item...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002919
The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was wounded in action in the RVN on 25 February 1970 and that he was awarded the PH as evidenced by an entry in item 40 of his DA Form 20 and by PH orders on file in his record. The evidence of record also confirms the applicant received two awards of the ARCOM for meritorious achievement during two separate periods as evidenced by ARCOM award orders on file in his record. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012834
The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH and the BSM for three separate periods, and that these awards were announced in official orders. As a result, Item 24 of the applicants separation document should be corrected to add the PH and to show his entitlement to the BSM with 2nd OLC to denote three awards instead of two awards of the BSM. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013714
Powers Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows he earned the following awards during his active duty tenure: the National Defense Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal (First Award), the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic Vietnam Campaign Medal, the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005015
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 November 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140005015 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record shows: a. GOs awarded the applicant the * PH * ARCOM (2nd OLC) b. the applicant qualified for award of the * NDSM * KDSM * RVNCM with Device (1960) c. the applicant also qualified for award of the VSM and he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011640
The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH and BSM and that these awards were announced in official orders. The evidence of record also clearly shows that both the hospital and the applicant's unit issued orders awarding him the PH based on being wounded in action on 30 May 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Item 24 of the DD Form 214 by deleting the current list of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008943
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 November 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008943 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 27 July 1967 through 4 June 1969, and to add this award to his record and DD Form 214 at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his...