Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005780
Original file (20080005780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  10 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005780 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his Reentry (RE) code of RE-4 be upgraded.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his uncharacterized discharge should allow him to reenter the service if he meets all other requirements.  

3.  The applicant provides a supplemental letter, dated 10 April 2008; his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 March 2002; a letter congratulating him on the completion of the Physical Training Rehabilitation Program, dated 17 August 1999; his Certificate of Achievement, dated 17 August 1999; his certificate from the 1st Basic Combat Training Brigade, dated 30 September 1999; two DA Forms 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) for the periods ending 16 March 2001 and 31 March 2001; his active duty for special work orders; 
three DA Forms 4187 (Personnel Action); and his Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) - Case Report and Directive.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  After having had prior service in the Army National Guard, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 April 2001.  Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty this Period) on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 2002 incorrectly shows he entered active duty on 19 August 2000.

2.  The applicant was discharged from the service on temporary records on 15 March 2002 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He completed 8 months and 23 days of active military service during this period with 59 days of lost time due to AWOL.  Item 12c (Net Active Service this Period) on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 2002 incorrectly shows he completed 1 year, 4 months and 27 days of active military service.  He was placed on excess leave for 198 days from 30 August 2001 to 15 March 2002.

3.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 March 2002 shows he was issued a RE code of RE-4 and a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of "KFS" (In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial).  

4.  On 14 March 2007, the ADRB upgraded the applicant’s under other than honorable conditions discharge to uncharacterized.  The ADRB determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.  

5.  Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the separation program designators to be used for these stated reasons.  The regulation shows that the separation program designator “KFS” as shown on the applicant’s DD Form 214 specifies the narrative reason for discharge as “In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial” and that the authority for discharge under this separation program designator is 
“AR 635-200, chapter 10."  

6.  Table 2-3 (SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table), Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes RE code 4 as the proper reentry code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10 in lieu of trial by court-martial.  

7.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes.

8.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service and the disqualification is not waivable.


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was discharged with a separation code of “KFS” (In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial) and was assigned a RE code of “4” in accordance with the governing regulation in effect at the time.

2.  Although the ADRB upgraded the applicant’s character of service to uncharacterized, the ADRB found that the reason for his discharge was proper and equitable.  As there appears to be no reason to change his reason for separation, a RE-4 is still appropriate.  

3.  The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted or the evidence of record that the reentry code issued to him was administratively incorrect, in error, or unjust.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___xx___  ___xx___  ___xx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




       _    _xxxx__   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005780





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005780



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010181

    Original file (20080010181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This memorandum indicated that after the applicant had returned from a 3-day rest and recreation from the CSC (113th Combat Stress Unit) he was verbally informed to report back to his section and continue to do his job. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), provides, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010601

    Original file (20060010601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The ADRB denied the applicant's request to change his narrative reason for discharge or his RE code. A separation code of "KFS" applies to persons who are separated under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table shows that an RE code of 4 is the applicable RE code assigned for individuals separated by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008970

    Original file (20080008970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He was given an RE code of 4 and a separation code of KFS (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10). Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009595

    Original file (20090009595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code. He states the Board should consider upgrading his discharge and RE code in order for him to be reinstated within the U.S. Army. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000115

    Original file (20100000115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his under other than honorable conditions discharge be changed to an uncharacterized discharge and that his Reentry Eligibility (RE) Code be changed to a 3. On 9 September 2009, the ADRB, after careful consideration of the applicant's military records and all other available evidence, determined the applicant's discharge was proper and equitable. c. Records show the applicant's assigned RE Code of 4 is appropriate based on the authority and reason for his discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009546

    Original file (AR20130009546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge from under other than honorable conditions to uncharacterized and a change to the narrative reason for separation to include the reentry eligibility (RE) code. On 1 May 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions 4. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013104

    Original file (20090013104.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 May 2003, the applicant was accordingly discharged. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separating under chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200. The evidence of record further confirms that the applicant's RE code was assigned based on the fact that he was separated under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 in lieu of a trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012977

    Original file (20110012977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states: * he needs these codes changed so he can enlist in the Army * his discharge was upgraded from under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) to uncharacterized * his wife was very ill with lupus at the time and she was unable to care for herself and their children 3. Army Regulation 635-200 states that individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty. The applicant's request that his RE...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002927

    Original file (20090002927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged for the good of the service in lieu of a court-martial with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The SPD code of "KFS" is the correct code for Soldiers separated under chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130002142

    Original file (AR20130002142.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 September 2006, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 4 Oct 2006, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial, a Separation Program Designator code (SPD) of KFS and an RE code of 4. Army...