Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005653
Original file (20080005653.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  26 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005653 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that he be advanced on the retired list to the rank of sergeant first class (SFC), E-7.

2.  The applicant states that he held the rank of SFC, E-7 for approximately 30 months.  He states he attended the Oklahoma Military Academy and graduated on 17 November 1985.  He was promoted to SFC, E-7 on 8 April 1986.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his promotion orders to SFC, E-7; his reduction orders to staff sergeant (SSG), E-6; and his diploma from the Advanced Course for Reserve Component Noncommissioned Officers.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 10 October 1946.  He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 19 May 1966.  He was promoted to specialist four, E-4 on 1 December 1967.  He was released from active duty on 17 May 1968 and was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training) on the following date.  The applicant was discharged from the USAR Control Group (Standby) on 18 May 1972 in the rank of specialist four.  

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 19 August 1975.  

3.  State of Oklahoma, Military Department, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Orders Number 82-3, dated 9 April 1986, promoted the applicant to the rank of SFC, E-7 with an effective date of 8 April 1986 and awarded him primary military occupational specialty 94B4O (Food Service Sergeant).

4.  Headquarters, 45th Field Artillery Brigade, Oklahoma Army National Guard, Orders Number 43-1, dated 14 September 1988, shows the applicant was reduced from the rank of SFC, E-7 to SSG, E-6 with an effective date of 1 October 1988 and a date of rank of 11 June 1979.  The orders indicate he was reduced in accordance with National Guard Regulation 600-200, paragraph 
6-44h by reason of the individual’s request without prejudice.

5.  The applicant received his Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at 
Age 60 (20-Year Letter) on 28 March 1994.

6.  Office of the Adjutant General, State of New York, Latham, New York Orders Number 015-018, dated 19 January 1996, show the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 1 January 1996 in the rank of SSG, E-6 and was assigned to the Retired Reserve.  

7.  The applicant reached age 60 on 10 October 2006.

8.  Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri Orders P03-783435, dated 22 March 2007, show the applicant was retired and placed on the retired list on 10 October 2006 in the rank of SSG, E-6.

9.  Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay…in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service.  Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory…if it is determined that any of the following factors exist:  (a) revision to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, or court-martial; or (b) there is information in the Soldier’s service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily.

10.  Army Regulation 135-180, paragraph 1-4 states that retired pay is pay granted Soldiers and former Reserve components Soldiers under Title 10, United States Code, section 1331 after completion of 20 or more years of qualifying service and upon attaining age 60.  This pay is based on the highest grade satisfactorily held at any time during an individual’s entire period of service, other than in an inactive section of a Reserve component.


11.  Army Regulation 135-180, paragraph 2-11c states that the Retired Activities Directorate, ARPERCEN [Army Reserve Personnel Center currently known as the Human Resources Command-St. Louis] will screen each retirement applicant’s record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service.  In arriving at the highest grade satisfactorily held, one of the criteria indicates that if the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that grade which a commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier held while on active duty or in an active reserve status for at least 185 days or six calendar months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was promoted to SFC, E-7 on 8 April 1986.

2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was reduced to SSG, E-6 with an effective date of 1 October 1988.  His reduction orders indicate he was administratively reduced to SSG, E-6 as a result of his request.  

3.  Orders were published on 22 March 2007 which show the applicant was retired and placed on the retired list on 10 October 2006 in the rank of SSG.

4.  Advancement on the retired list to highest grade held is based on satisfactory service in that grade.  The evidence of record indicates the applicant satisfactorily served as an SFC, E-7 for more than 185 days and six calendar months.

5.  It appears that an error exists in this case regarding the applicant’s retirement grade.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend the applicant’s retirement orders to show he was placed on the retired list in the rank of SFC.

BOARD VOTE:

xxx______  xx______  xx______  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, 
St. Louis, Missouri Orders P03-783435, dated 22 March 2007, to show he was retired and placed on the retired list on 10 October 2006 in the retired grade of SFC, E-7.

2.  That, upon implementation of the correction in paragraph 1 above, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service should audit the retired pay account of the individual concerned to determine all monies due to him and that he be paid all monies due to him.



      xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ___
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005653



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005653



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010083

    Original file (20110010083.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he retired from the Indiana Army National Guard (INARNG) in the rank/grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 instead of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 and to restore his retired pay in the pay grade of E-7, the highest grade in which he satisfactorily served in the U.S. Air Force Reserve (USAFR). In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to MSgt/E-7 and successfully held that grade for many years until he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006130

    Original file (20130006130.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he held pay grade E-7 in the Illinois Air National Guard from 13 March 1989 to 9 October 1996 * when his unit "revitalized him out," he enlisted in the Illinois Army National Guard (ARNG) and took a voluntary reduction in grade to pay grade E-6 because that was the position available * he transferred to the Oklahoma ARNG and retired there * E-6 was his pay grade at retirement on 1 March 1999 * he requested retirement in pay grade E-7 3. The evidence of record shows...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004089

    Original file (20140004089.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he held the rank/grade of SFC/E-7 when he was discharged from active duty * he enlisted in the Mississippi Army National Guard (MSARNG) approximately 2 years later in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 because there were no E-7 positions available * he was promoted to the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 in the MSARNG * he was always told he would retire in the highest rank successfully held * he retired on 24 December 2013 and his retirement orders show his rank/grade as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005153

    Original file (20140005153.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was placed on the Retired List in the rank and grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. On 7 February 2000, the TXARNG issued Orders 038-207, discharging him from the ARNG and assigning him to the Retired Reserve effective 31 December 1999. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Orders P03-942379, issued by HRC, dated 14 March 2011, to show he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005872

    Original file (20080005872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-11c states the Retired Activities Directorate, Army Reserve Personnel Center (currently designated as Human Resources Command, St. Louis) will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service. Evidence of record confirms that the applicant satisfactorily served in the INARNG in the rank and pay grade SFC/E-7 from 3 July...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015929

    Original file (20130015929.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. In the applicant's case, the evidence of record shows he was promoted to SFC/E-7 and successfully held that grade for many years until he was honorably discharged from the USAR on 10 November...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004188

    Original file (20080004188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was reduced to the rank of SSG, pay grade E-6 with an effective date of 1 May 1995. The applicant's record indicates that he retired on 14 November 2007 and held the rank and grade of SSG, E-6 on the date of his retirement. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Department of the Army, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, Missouri Orders P11-794055,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009458

    Original file (20130009458.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Retired Activities Directorate, Army Reserve Personnel Center, now known as HRC, will screen each retirement applicant's record to determine the highest grade held by him or her during his or her military service to determine the highest grade satisfactorily held. If the Soldier was transferred to the Retired Reserve or discharged on or after 25 February 1975, the retired grade will be that grade which a commissioned officer or enlisted Soldier held while serving on active duty or in an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006834

    Original file (20110006834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 135-180 (ARNG and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. By law, a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade satisfactorily held by him or her during his or her entire period of service. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017795

    Original file (20130017795.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His DA Form 2-1 indicates in block 5 (Assignment Consideration): * he was not recommended for further service on 13 June 1986 * he had been removed from the SFC/E-7 Selection list * his bar to reenlistment was reviewed and it was not...