Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005410
Original file (20080005410.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  10 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080005410 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his reentry (RE) code be changed to one that will enable him to enlist.

2.  The applicant states that after completing basic combat training on 7 February 2006, he was notified of his grandfather’s death on 10 February 2006.  His father was emotionally destroyed when his mother walked out on them, but his grandfather was there for him and was the closest person to him during that time. His grandfather being an ex-Navy Seal, his father ex-Navy and now just finishing Special Forces, the military runs in his family.  His father always raised him to quit nothing he started until it was finished.  

3.  The applicant stated that when he arrived home he went straight to his grandmother.  Seeing her so emotionally destroyed and upset, it reminded him of his dad and how his dad had nobody but the applicant to talk to when his mom left them.  He told his grandmother he would be there for her.  After the funeral, it was very hard for him to shake off everything that just happened.  He just lost one of the most important people in his life, and he realized that he needed to get back into a completely different mind set.  He knew he was not thinking clearly, and it was the wrong decision to make, to avoid dealing with the stress of returning to complete military training.  He became frustrated and upset over not returning and felt that he had ruined his life by not being able to focus on his military duty.  He knows he can make a good Soldier and do his part.  All his life he has wanted to work in law enforcement, and being a military police would be a great foundation toward his career path.

4.  The applicant provides his separation orders and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was born on 26 January 1987.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 November 2005.  He completed basic combat training. 

2.  On 15 February 2006, the applicant departed absent without leave (AWOL) after failing to return from emergency leave.  On 7 October 2006, he was apprehended by civil authorities.  

3.  On 16 October 2006, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant charging him with being AWOL from on or about 15 February 2006 to on or about 7 October 2006. 

4. On 16 October 2006, after consulting with legal counsel, the applicant voluntarily requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation     635-200, chapter 10 for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He acknowledged that he was making the request of his own free will and had not been subjected to any coercion whatsoever by any person.  He acknowledged that by submitting the request for discharge that he was guilty of the charge(s) against him or lesser included offenses(s) contained therein which also authorized the imposition of a bad conduct or dishonorable discharge.  He stated that under no circumstances did he desire further rehabilitation, for he had no desire to perform further military service.  He was advised of the effects of a discharge under other than honorable conditions and that he might be deprived of many or all Army and Veterans Administration benefits.  He elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf.

5.  On 3 November 2006, the appropriate authority approved the request and directed the applicant receive a discharge under other than honorable conditions.

6.  On 22 November 2006, the applicant was discharged, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He had completed 4 months and 9 days of creditable active service and had         233 days of lost time.  He was given a separation code of KFS (voluntary discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial).

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

8.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 covers eligibility criteria, policies and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the U.S. Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of armed forces RE codes, including RA RE codes.

9.  RE code 4 applies to persons not qualified for continued Army service, and the disqualification is not waivable.  

10.  The Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code/Reentry (RE) Code Cross Reference Table states that when the separation code is KFS then RE code       4 will be issued.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions have been carefully considered.  However, he was AWOL for over 7 months, and it was his decision to elect discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, stating he had no desire to perform further military service.

2.  Based upon the circumstances of this case, the applicant was properly issued an RE code of 4 and there is insufficient evidence to show why it should be changed.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xx____  ___xx___  __xx____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




 _    ______xxxx____________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005410





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080005410



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-01382

    Original file (MD03-01382.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-01382 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030812. So people in society treated me so different it was hard to even go to school. 990708: Charges preferred to special court-martial for violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 86: Unauthorized absence (UA) from 980317 to 990601 (441 days/A).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080010755

    Original file (AR20080010755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If I was allowed the time to spend the time with my family and friends and give my self time to adjust to the new distressing things in my life and be able to return to the ARMY and readjust to the ARMY life then I believe I would have fulfilled my entire contract without a problem. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review, and the issue and documents submitted with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009896

    Original file (20110009896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In his voluntary request for discharge, he acknowledged he understood if his request were accepted he could be discharged under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The evidence of record does not show and the applicant has not provided evidence to show error, injustice, or inequity in the RE code shown on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015094

    Original file (20090015094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 2 March 2006, the approving authority granted the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with the issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009596

    Original file (20110009596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of his undesirable discharge (UD) to an Honorable Discharge. On 15 June 1973, the applicant having consulted with a duly-certified legal counsel, voluntarily requested discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial. The applicant requests that he be given an Honorable Discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110004085

    Original file (AR20110004085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This caused me to feel even more anxiety and upset as now I was even farther away from my unit in Iraq. I was refused and due to my continued upset and resulting behavior was sent back to Ft Dix and discharged with a less than honorable character of discharge. I understand my behavior was less than what the military expects of its Soldiers, but I feel that my prior 18 years of service (Honorable discharge from the ARNG) and performance while in Iraq, should supersede the actions of a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006646

    Original file (20080006646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the applicant was discharged under other than honorable conditions on 28 December 1978 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008959

    Original file (20080008959.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, upgrade of his discharge to an honorable discharge. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) that shows he was discharged on 22 January 1971, under conditions other than honorable, in accordance with the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 10, for the good of the Service, with Separation Program Number (SPN) “246,” and issued a DD Form 258A...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019194

    Original file (20100019194.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's request for an upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge was carefully considered; however, there is insufficient evidence to support his request. Based on his record of indiscipline, including his bar to reenlistment and 7 months and 18 days of time lost, due to being AWOL and in confinement, his service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. _______ _ _x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006619

    Original file (20130006619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 January 1983, court-martial charges were preferred against the applicant for one specification of being AWOL from 16 August 1982 to 4 January 1983. On 27 January 1983, the applicant was discharged accordingly. The DD Form 214, as amended by his DD Form 215, shows he was discharged for the good of the service - in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.