Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004829
Original file (20080004829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  31 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004829 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the denial of his request to correct Item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of his separation document (DD Form 214) to show he entered active duty on 27 April 1974.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the Board should reconsider the final decision of his case based on the current documents he submitted that will prove in fact he did enlist into the U.S. Armed Forces and was hospitalized at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri on the date and time in question.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a personal statement and an extract of his medical records.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20070013411, on 5 February 2008.

2.  In its original decision the ABCMR found that the applicant entered active duty on 18 September 1975 and that he did not provide any evidence to show he was in the hospital at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri from 2 to 9 December 1974.  His available records contain no evidence to show that his date of entry on active duty was incorrect.  As such, there was no basis to support granting the requested relief.
3.  The applicant has provided new evidence which requires that his case be reconsidered by the ABCMR.

4.  The applicant submitted an extract of his medical record as new evidence.  The applicant's medical record does show that his enlistment examination was conducted at the 94th General Hospital, Mesquite, Texas, on 20 April 1974.  The medical records also show that the applicant received treatment at the U.S. Army Reception Station and Troop Medical Clinic #2 at Fort Leonard wood, Missouri, between 2 to 12 December 1974.

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, states in pertinent part, that you enter the date entered active duty for this period of continuous active duty in Item 15 of the present DD Form 214, for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant requests reconsideration of the denial of his previous request to correct Item 15 of his DD Form 214 to show he entered active duty on 27 April 1974.

2.  The applicant has provided new evidence, which shows he was at the U.S. Reception Station and Troop Medical Clinic #2, Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri between 2 to 9 December 1974.  Although, his medical records show he was at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri, it does not show he served continuously on active duty starting from 27 April 1974.  Since the applicant was ordered to active duty on 18 September 1975 for 22 months and 23 days, it appears that the applicant was released from active duty in 1974 and returned to his Army Reserve unit.

3.  As such, a presumption of regularity must be applied, that what the Army did was correct.  It is up to the applicant to prove otherwise.  The applicant has not submitted any documentation to overcome the presumption of regularity.  Therefore, he is not entitled to correction of his records to show that he entered active duty on 27 April 1974 in Item 15 of his DD Form 214.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20070013411, dated 8 February 2008.




       _    __X_____   ___
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004829



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004829



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013411

    Original file (20070013411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period), of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), be corrected to show that he entered active duty on 20 April 1974 (sic 27 April 1974) instead of 18 September 1975. The evidence shows that he enlisted in the USAR on 27 April 1974 and was involuntarily ordered to active duty on 18 September 1975. The applicant states that he went home for Christmas leave in December 1974, that he went AWOL in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100245C070208

    Original file (2004100245C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's medical records indicate that on 12 July 1973, while on active duty for training, he sustained an injury to his shoulder. The commander indicated that the applicant was unable to work and that his record contained copies of 15 Letters of Instruction from the hospital, 15 certificates of injury, a request for active duty orders with 13 endorsements, and other documents...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016539

    Original file (20140016539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. correction of the separation date shown on his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show he was retained on active duty through 31 August 1978; and b. correction of his DD Form 214 or DD Form 256A (Honorable Discharge Certificate) to show his release from active duty (REFRAD) and discharge resulted from service-connected disabilities. There is no evidence that definitively shows the applicant was retained on continuous active duty for a period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019490

    Original file (20080019490.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 May 1974, the applicant submitted a DD Form 293 (Application for Review of Discharge or Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States) requesting upgrade of the character of service of his discharge. There is no evidence of record and the applicant provides insufficient evidence to show that he enlisted in the U.S. Army when he was 16 years of age. There is also no evidence of record of any documented unfitting medical condition(s).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022086

    Original file (20110022086.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and he served in four campaigns during his service in Vietnam. d. Despite the absence of the unit commander's recommendation for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), based on the available evidence it would be appropriate to award the applicant this medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show the award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013042

    Original file (20110013042.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: a. his military occupational specialty (MOS); b. his awards, to include the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Army Service Ribbon (ASR), and marksmanship qualification badges; and c. his military training. The applicant's DD Form 214 indicates: a. in item 11 (Primary Specialty), "none"; b. in item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008787

    Original file (20080008787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also requests that his record be corrected to show he retired on 12 April 1972. The evidence of record shows the applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 30 October 1968.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000977

    Original file (20090000977.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 16 May 1975, the applicant requested a discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10 (Discharge for the Good of the Service). The documents show the applicant stated, "I went AWOL because of marital problems I had after I joined the service. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant was 19 years of age when he submitted his request for discharge for the good of the service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1995 | 9505978C070209

    Original file (9505978C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 7 March 1989 letter from the VA to the applicant stated that the VA had reviewed his disability compensation claim and that records did not show that he received treatment for diabetes, stroke, hypertension, or headaches during his service nor were they recorded in his report of examination upon his discharge. Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so. BOARD VOTE: EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE GRANT...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016637

    Original file (20110016637.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC) while he was on active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm and that he retired in this rank. However, he was not promoted. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.