Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004826
Original file (20080004826.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  5 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004826 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Honorable Discharge Certificate from the Army National Guard to show his rank as sergeant (SGT), 
E-5.  

2.  The applicant states that his rank should have been E-5 when he was discharged from the Army National Guard, but his discharge certificate shows his rank as specialist four (SP4), E-4.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 July 1986; his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service); and a NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22).  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board.  This case is being considered using the documents provided by the applicant.

3.  The applicant’s NGB Form 22 shows he enlisted in the Army National Guard on 12 July 1983 with prior service.  He served in the Inactive Guard from 1 November 1984 through 11 July 1986.

4.  The applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard on 11 July 1986.

5.  Item 5a (Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) on his NGB Form 22 shows his rank and pay grade as SP4 and E-4.  His date of rank is shown as 12 July 1983 in item 6.

6.  The applicant’s Honorable Discharge Certificate shows his rank as SP4 on the standard name line.

7.  An NGB Form 22A, dated 14 January 1987, amended items 5a, 5b, and 6 on the applicant’s NGB Form 22 to show his rank and pay grade as SGT, E-5 and his date of rank as 12 July 1983.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was issued an NGB Form 22A in January 1987 which amended his rank to SGT, E-5 with a date of rank of 12 July 1983.  However, his Honorable Discharge Certificate shows his rank as SP4.  

2.  It appears that an administrative error has occurred in this case regarding the applicant’s rank on his Honorable Discharge Certificate.  Therefore, it would be appropriate to amend his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 July 1986 to show his rank as SGT.  

BOARD VOTE:

xx______  xx______  xx______  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all the State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his Honorable Discharge Certificate, dated 11 July 1986, to show his rank as SGT.



      xxxxxxxxx______________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004826



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004826



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017847

    Original file (20080017847.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 April 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080017847 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Docket Number AR20080008301 boarded on 29 July 2008 which denied his request to upgrade his rank on his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), dated 1 January 1985 from specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 to pay grade E-5. He...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012312

    Original file (20070012312.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 18 (Appointments and Reductions), of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part ll), shows that he was reduced to pay grade E-3 effective 15 January 1987. The evidence shows that the applicant was promoted to pay grade E-4 on 27 September 1985. The evidence shows that he served in pay grade E-4 from 27 September 1985 until 15 January 1987, the date he was reduced to pay grade E-3.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008301

    Original file (20080008301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of the applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows the entries SP4 and E-4, respectively. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows he had an out-of-State job transfer while serving in the Army National Guard. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows he was promoted again to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021768

    Original file (20110021768.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 3-4 of Army Regulation 600-20 states, for a PS ARNG Soldier who enlists in the ARNG more than 24 months after discharge, the DOR on restoration to a grade from which reduced following a successful appeal of the reduction or action by a superior authority to mitigate the punishment is the DOR held before the reduction. His record shows he was granted an enlistment waiver and he enlisted in the GAARNG on 6 January 2003 in the grade of PVT/E-1. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005050

    Original file (20140005050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows in: * item 5a – PVT (permanent (P)) * item 5b – E-2 * item 6 – 8 May 1967 * item 11a (Type of Transfer or Discharge) – release to the NYARNG * item 11c (Reason and Authority) – Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), Separation Program Number (SPN) 764 (Release of Trainees upon Completion of Military Occupational Specialty Training) * item 11d (Effective Date) – 14 September 1967 * item 17a (Source of Entry) – ordered to ACDUTRA * item 17c...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011970

    Original file (20110011970.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was discharged from the Pennsylvania Army National Guard (PAARNG) in the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4 instead of private (PV2)/E-2. The regulation in effect at the time stated the NGB Form 22 would show the rank and grade at the time of separation. In the absence of official orders that conclusively show he was promoted to SP4/E-4 and held that rank/grade at the time of his discharge from the ARNG, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019732

    Original file (20100019732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: * Item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and item 5b (Pay Grade) his rank and pay grade as specialist five (SP5)/E-5 * Item 22 (Statement of Service) the entry 2 years, 9 months, and 29 days * Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) award of the Purple Heart 2. Summary Court-Martial Order Number 4,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013625

    Original file (20100013625.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he completed 3 months and 6 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He was inducted on 10 February 1970 and was honorably discharged on 18 November 1970. Therefore, he completed 9 months and 2 days of foreign service in Vietnam during the period covered by this DD Form 214, which is correctly shown in item 22c of this DD Form 214. d. He enlisted on 19 November 1970 and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003335C070206

    Original file (20050003335C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 November 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050003335 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his rank and pay grade as sergeant (SGT), E-5. In addition, it would be appropriate to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001804

    Original file (20150001804.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant signed the document verifying the accuracy of the information recorded on the DD Form 214. c. Based on the above and the available evidence of record, it is concluded that the DD Form 214 correctly shows the applicant's active duty service during this period (emphasis added) and rank/grade at the time he was released from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...