Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004425
Original file (20080004425.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	         6 January 2009

		DOCKET NUMBER:   AR20080004425 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) for promotion to Major be adjusted.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion was delayed after submitting an Electronic Personnel Security Questionnaire (EPSQ) in September 2002.  He argues that he was assigned to a Major position in November 2002 and in January 2003 a tracer was sent about the status of the EPSQ and interim clearance.  He continues that the security clearance investigating agencies changed responsibility roles during initial submission period and the records were lost, requiring him to resubmit the EPSQ documentation on 17 May 2003.  He concludes that his promotion was granted in July 2003 with a date of rank of 
17 May 2003.

3.  The applicant provides a US Army Reserve Personnel Command promotion memorandum, dated 14 July 2003; an Officer Evaluation Report for the period 
1 March 2003 to 1 August 2003; a Unit Manning Report; and a Security Clearance Application in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Records show the applicant was commissioned as a second lieutenant in the US Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 May 1989.  He was promoted to first lieutenant on 24 May 1991.  On 4 September 1995, he was promoted to captain.

2.  Records show the applicant's promotion to major was suspended on 26 July 2002 because he did not meet the security clearance qualifications.  Records further show his security clearance was downgraded to confidential on 
5 November 2002.

3.  A memorandum, dated 13 June 2003, notified the applicant of his suspended promotion status.

4.  Records indicate the applicant's EPQS was approved and he was granted a valid security clearance effective 17 May 2003.

5.  On 14 July 2003, the applicant was promoted to major with a date of rank of 17 May 2003.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Special Actions Branch, Department of the Army Promotions, U.S. Army Human Resources Command, Saint Louis, Missouri.  The opinion pointed out that the applicant was selected for promotion by the 2002 Department of the Army Reserve Component Major Selection Board with a promotion eligibility date of 22 May 2002, which was approved for release on 16 June 2002.  He was in a troop program unit and assigned to a higher grade position on 1 November 2002. The applicant did not meet the promotion requirement of possessing a valid security clearance and was not promoted at the time.  Upon receipt of a valid clearance he was promoted with a date of rank of 17 May 2003.  The opinion also pointed out that if the applicant is granted an earlier clearance date his case should be returned to their office for re-evaluation for an earlier date of rank.

7.  A copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment and possible rebuttal.  The applicant did not respond within the given timeframe.

8.  The applicant provided an Officer Evaluation Report which shows he was rated as a major for the period 1 March 2003 to 1 August 2003 and a Unit Manning Report dated 24 January 2003, which shows the applicant was assigned to a major position effective 1 November 2002.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his date of rank should be adjusted was carefully considered and found to be without merit.

2.  Evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion to the rank of major on 22 May 2002 and the list was approved for release on 16 June 2002.  However, the applicant’s promotion eligibility was suspended because he did not meet the promotion requirement of possessing a valid security clearance.  Upon completion of the EPSQ and determination to award a security clearance, the applicant was promoted to the rank of major.

3.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided any evidence such as his original EPSQ or a statement from his unit security officer or central clearance facility showing that his promotion to the rank of major was erroneously delayed.  Absent such evidence, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004425





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004425



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005443C070205

    Original file (20060005443C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He advised the applicant that his date of rank would be 1 February 2005, unless he could submit proof that he had a valid security clearance before that date. The policy states a second lieutenant will be promoted to first lieutenant with a date of rank of 1 February 2005, without a current physical, security clearance, and APFT. The evidence shows that promotion authorities verified that the applicant had failed the APFT and did not have a valid security clearance at the time he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005979C070206

    Original file (20050005979C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 September 2005, the unit personnel security officer informed the Board analyst that the applicant's security clearance had been revoked (for an unknown reason) in October 1986. The evidence of record shows the applicant was selected for promotion by FY2005 MSG Promotion Selection Board and promotions were made through his sequence number on 1 December 2004. The email from the applicant's personnel security officer indicates his clearance was completed on 14 March 2005 and he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004549C070206

    Original file (20050004549C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a memorandum, dated 21 February 2003, the Chief, Military Personnel Actions Branch, HRC, advised the 81st RSC, and the applicant, that she was not in a promotable status due to the following disqualifications found in the database: she did not have a current qualifying Physical Examination (less than 5 years old), she did not possess a valid security clearance, and she was not assigned to a valid position. A Promotion Memorandum, dated 10 February 2005, was issued to the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090375C070212

    Original file (2003090375C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was promoted to major with a promotion effective date and date of rank of 21 January 2003. TPU officers selected by a mandatory board will have a promotion effective date and rank of rank no earlier than the date the board is approved provided they are assigned to a position in the higher grade. The applicant is entitled to correction of his promotion effective date and date of rank for promotion to major 1 April 2002, the day after his transfer to a Reserve TPU major's position.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081965C070215

    Original file (2002081965C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the Board does find sufficient evidence to support establishing the applicant’s promotion effective date to 19 June 2002, the date the President approved the list, it does not find an evidentiary basis to support the applicant’s request to change his promotion date to 27 August 2001, the date he assumed an 0-4 position. The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was selected for promotion by the FY02 MAJ/0-4 RC PSB, and that this promotion list was approved by the President...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012064

    Original file (20070012064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 from 24 March 2005 to 15 September 2003 or a date to be determined by the Board based on the evidence provided. National Guard Bureau, Arlington, Virginia, Memorandum, dated 16 December 2003, subject: Army National Guard (ARNG) Promotion Process for Commissioned Officers, provides guidance to The Adjutants General (TAG) on the procedures for requesting Federal recognition of first lieutenant, DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050005994C070206

    Original file (20050005994C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), his mobilization orders, his troop program unit (TPU) to TPU transfer orders, his notification of promotion to major, and his promotion memorandum for major. Promotion action could not be completed due to the following disqualifications: he must pass an APFT within 12 months of the date of promotion, he must meet height/weight standards as prescribed by Army Regulation 600-9 within 12...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012374

    Original file (20080012374.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The American Legion, as counsel for the applicant, requests that: a. all flag/negative actions in the applicant's record since 11 September 2001 be expunged; b. a non-prejudicial statement be placed in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) to cover the gap for the Officer Evaluation Report (OER) that he never received for his last year of service in Korea; c. the applicant be afforded promotion consideration to full colonel as if his security clearance had not been...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027837

    Original file (20100027837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A USARC Form 56-R (Promotion Qualification Statement for [U.S. Army Reserve Command] Mobilized TPU Officers), dated 25 August 2003, shows his commander verified he was qualified for promotion. An officer selected for the first time for promotion to the next higher grade may be promoted on or before the date he/she completes the maximum service. The evidence of record does not show errors in the applicant's rank or DOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 2005000341C070206

    Original file (2005000341C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    It is noted that the applicant submitted a DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) provided to officers in the grade of captain who were first-time considered and selected for promotion to captain, after having served more than 7 combined maximum years in grade to seek relief from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) for adjustment to dates of rank for captain under the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act Project. The SMS also shows that on 31...