Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004266
Original file (20080004266.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  11 September 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080004266 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) effective 31 July 1994, to show the military occupational specialties (MOS’s) that he held and how long he held them.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 should show that he held MOS 31W (Mobile Subscriber Equipment Communications Chief) for 16 years and 
1 month; MOS 11B (Infantryman) for 1 year and 5 months; and MOS 71M (Chaplain’s Assistant) for 4 months.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 and Special Orders Number 221, Fort Gordon, Georgia, dated 12 August 1969, assigning him for duty in MOS 11B. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  Records show that the applicant served in the Regular Army from 1 April 1969 to 31 December 1970.  He was awarded MOS 71M (Chaplain’s Assistant) on 
24 November 1969.  He was transferred to the United States Army Reserve and served in an inactive status from 1 January 1971 to 30 April 1975; and from 15 to 25 April 1976.  Detailed information concerning this period of service is not available for the Board to review.

3.  On 26 April 1976, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army beginning in the rank of private, pay grade E-2.  He completed his initial training and was awarded MOS 36C (Wire Systems Installer).

4.  Item 6 (MOS’s) of the applicant’s Personnel Qualification Record, Part II, shows at the time of the last review on 16 February 1993, that the applicant held qualification in the following MOS’s:

	a.  Primary MOS 31W4M (MSE Communications Chief) since 
21 September 1992;

	b.  Secondary MOS 36M4O (Wire Systems Operator) since 1 September 1983;

	c.  Additional MOS 03C4O (Physical Activities Specialist) since 5 July 1978; and

	d. Additional MOS 71M4O (Chaplain’s Assistant) since 5 July 1978.

5.  On 31 July 1994, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired).  He had attained the rank of sergeant first class, pay grade E-7 and had completed 
20 years and 5 days of creditable active duty. 

6.  Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 list MOS 31W4M (Mobile Subscriber Equipment (MSE) Communications Chief), 1 year and 10 months; and 71M4O (Chaplain’s Assistant), 16 years and 1 month.  It does not list 11B (Infantryman).



7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provides, in pertinent part, for the entry in Item 11 (Primary Specialty) of each MOS held by the applicant at release from active duty or discharge for periods of 1 year or more.  Entries are to include the MOS number, title, and years and months held. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant held qualification in the following MOS’s for the periods indicated at the time of his retirement:

	a.  31W4M for 1 year and 10 months;

	b.  36M4O for 10 years and 11 months;

	c.  03C4O for 16 years and 1 month; and

	d.  71M4O for 16 years and 1 month.

2.  In view of the above, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show his correct MOS’s.

3.  There is no available evidence of record showing that he held qualification in MOS 11B (Infantryman) at any time during his last period of active duty.  Therefore, this MOS should not be shown on his DD Form 214, effective 31 July 1994.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

____X___  ___X ___  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION






BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing in Item 11 (Primary Specialties) 31W4M, Mobile Subscriber Equipment Communications Chief, for 1 year and 10 months; 36M4O, Wire Systems Operator, for 10 years and 11 months; 03C4O, Physical Activities Specialist, for 16 years and 1 month; and 71M4O, chaplain’s Assistant, for 16 years and 
1 month.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to showing that the applicant was qualified in MOS 11B or that he held MOS 31W4M for more than 1 year and 10 months.



	__________X_____________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004266



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009503

    Original file (20140009503.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show the correct amount of time for each military occupational specialty (MOS) listed. A calculation of the time the applicant held/served in each MOS of record shows the following: 1997 06 30 date retired from active duty - 1977 08 30 date awarded MOS 63B = 19 10 00 or 19 years and 10 months (MOS 63B) 1997 06 30 date retired from active duty - 1982 06 24 date awarded MOS 72E = 15...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000814

    Original file (20090000814.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000814 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 29 December 1993 be corrected to show a higher Reentry (RE) Code and that he held military occupational specialty (MOS) 94B (Cook) for 3 years and a communication MOS for 11 years and 4 months. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) provides, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000019

    Original file (20080000019.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    "; e. Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) to show “1997-04-15”; f. Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) to show “2005-04-15”; g. Item 12d (Total Prior Active Service) to show 21 mo. Therefore, there is no requirement to show this course in Item 14 of the applicant’s DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. adding the entry "0000 10 04" to Item 12d of the applicant's DD Form 214,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605941C070209

    Original file (9605941C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 20 November 1990 AER from the software analyst, MOS 74F, BNCOC at Fort Gordon, Georgia, shows that she was administratively released from the course because she failed written and hands-on portion [of the course], with a recommendation that she be allowed to work in her MOS before attending the course again. She stated, in effect, that because of overstrength in MOS 74F at Fort Gordon, she did not have the opportunity to work in that MOS, and coupled with the fact that she was recently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085094C070212

    Original file (2003085094C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. APPLICANT STATES : That,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008135C070208

    Original file (20040008135C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The evidence of record clearly shows a period of AWOL from 25 January 1994 to 1 February 1994. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088566C070403

    Original file (2003088566C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He was released from active duty on 8 January 1996 after 13 years, 5 months, and 25 days of service and placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL). Block #14 of the applicant's DD Form 214 was not correctly completed when the applicant separated. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003845

    Original file (20090003845.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he completed 3 years and 9 months of active service and that he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. The applicant provides copies of a DA Form 4980-14 (The Army Commendation Medal) Certificate, undated; and a DD Form 214 with an effective date of 23 May 2005. It states, in pertinent part, that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015423

    Original file (20130015423.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show: a. qualification for military occupational specialty (MOS) 31D (Mobile Subscriber Equipment Transmission System Operator), which he received while serving in the Michigan Army National Guard (MIARNG), qualified him for MOS 25Q (Multichannel Transmission Systems Operator-Maintainer), the MOS he enlisted for when he joined the South Carolina ARNG (SCARNG); and b. an exception to policy (ETP) was authorized allowing him to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007172

    Original file (20080007172.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Headquarters, V Corps, Orders 5-1, dated 11 January 1994, show the applicant was placed on the retired list in the retired rank of First Sergeant/E-8. There is no evidence in the available record that shows the applicant was selected for promotion to SGM/E-9. _ _______ X ______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.