Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004181
Original file (20080004181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	 

		BOARD DATE:	  18 September 2008	

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080004181 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) to show that he completed 2 years and 17 days of creditable active duty service.

2.  The applicant states that he entered active duty on 26 May 1982 and was released on 11 June 1984. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.



2.  On 26 May 1982, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years.  He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman).

3.  On 6 September 1982, the applicant was assigned for duty as a rifleman with the 2nd Battalion, 39th Infantry Regiment, at Fort Lewis, Washington.

4.  On 16 January 1984, the applicant was convicted by special court-martial of wrongful appropriation of a camera.  His sentence consisted of reduction to pay grade E-1, forfeiture of $350.00 pay per month for 2 months, and confinement at hard labor for 75 days.  He served 60 days in confinement.

5.  On 24 May 1984, the applicant’s commander initiated a recommendation to separate him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 13, for unsatisfactory performance.  

6.  On 29 May 1984, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation and directed that he be issued a General Discharge Certificate.  

7.  Accordingly, he was discharged under honorable conditions on 11 June 1984.  He had completed 1 year, 10 months and 16 days of creditable active service and had 2 months of lost time due to confinement.

8.  Item 12 (Record of Service) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he entered active duty on 26 May 1982 and was discharged on 11 June 1984.  Item 29 (Dates of Time Lost During This Period) of the same DD Form 214 shows that he had lost time from 16 January to 15 March 1984, a period of 2 months.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence clearly shows that the applicant served on active duty from 
26 May 1982 through 11 June 1984 and had 2 months of lost time.  Therefore, he accrued 1 year, 10 months, and 16 days of creditable active duty service, as is shown on his DD Form 214.

2.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should be denied.







BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_____  ___X____  ___X___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _X   _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004181





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080004181



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010715C070208

    Original file (20040010715C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 4 April 1984 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. Although the applicant contends that he was discharged in February or March 1983 and his DD Form 214 shows he was discharged in April 1984, evidence of record shows the applicant was placed on excess leave from 14 January 1983 to 4 April 1984, for a total of 447 days. Upon completion of his appellate review the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080018349

    Original file (AR20080018349.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He also states that he served his 6-month period of confinement for the incident and his discharge should be changed. The applicant’s military personnel records contain a copy of United States Army Court of Military Review, Appellate Military Judges, United States (Appellee) versus [Applicant] in Special Court-Martial 20719, Memorandum Opinion, dated 27 February 1985, that shows the Court having...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006166C070206

    Original file (20050006166C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged or retired by reason of physical disability. On 9 January 1987, the Army Discharge Review Board conducted a records review of his case and denied his request for upgrade of his discharge. While the applicant may be suffering from a mental health issue and received treatment for that condition subsequent to his separation, he provides no evidence that the condition was related to his military service or that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017044

    Original file (20080017044.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 July 1984, the applicant was discharged from the Army with a bad conduct discharge in the rank and pay grade of private/E-1 pursuant to the sentence of a special court-martial. This regulation provided, in pertinent part, that an enlisted person would be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial after completion of appellate review and after such affirmed sentence had been duly ordered executed. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001785

    Original file (20130001785.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 August 1982, the U.S. Army Court of Military Review, SPCM 16657, stated that "although appellant was released from confinement and returned to duty status within a month of trial, it nevertheless behooved the command to diligently and expeditiously process all records." There is no evidence of record which shows he was held in confinement for 16 months following his SPCM in April 1981. Since there is no evidence of record and he provides no evidence which shows he was held in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000775

    Original file (20080000775.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 February 1982, nonjudicial punishment was imposed against the applicant for at least two specifications of failing to go at the prescribed time to his appointed place of duty. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with a bad conduct discharge on 22 May 1984 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 3, as a result of a court-martial. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013080

    Original file (20090013080.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 26 April 1984, the applicant's commander notified him action was being recommended to separate him under the provisions of chapter 14 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) due to his conviction by civilian authorities for kidnapping and sexual battery. Therefore, based on the board of officers' recommendation that the applicant receive a general discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018227

    Original file (20090018227.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 May 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090018227 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his bad conduct discharge be upgraded to a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 2 May 1984, the applicant was discharged accordingly.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003148

    Original file (20090003148.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of the character of service of his under honorable conditions discharge to an honorable discharge. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant on the date of his separation confirms he was discharged under honorable conditions, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, based on civilian conviction with the separation code "JKB." There is no evidence the applicant applied to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008652

    Original file (20070008652.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Stone Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Based on his record of indiscipline, the applicant's service clearly does not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. William D. Powers ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070008652 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20071211 TYPE OF DISCHARGE (BCD) DATE OF DISCHARGE 19840312 DISCHARGE AUTHORITY AR 635-200, Chap...