IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 31 July 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080004059
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to show he was promoted to first lieutenant (1LT), O-2.
2. The applicant states that he was commissioned in July 2000. He was not properly transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) in 2003 and therefore missed promotions. He completed the Officer Basic Course (OBC) and is looking to attend the Captains Career Course (CCC). He is back in the District of Columbia Army National Guard and is still a second lieutenant (2LT), O-1.
3. The applicant provides two officer evaluation reports (OERs), one for the period ending 14 August 2001 and one for the period ending 19 August 2002; ARNG appointment orders; his appointment physical examination; a Federal Recognition packet, dated 21 June 2000; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 337 (Oaths of Office), dated 15 August 2000; an Officer Candidate School (OCS) completion certificate; Federal Recognition orders, dated 5 October 2000; separation orders, dated 19 February 2003; Federal Recognition Orders, dated 14 March 2003; and Federal Recognition orders, dated 30 July 2007.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the
3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. After having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed a 2LT in the ARNG effective 15 August 2000 and granted Federal Recognition as a 2LT in the ARNG effective 15 August 2000.
3. Effective 19 February 2003, the applicant was separated from the ARNG and transferred to the IRR. Effective 19 February 2003, Federal Recognition was withdrawn.
4. Effective 18 July 2007, the applicant transferred to the ARNG in the rank and grade of 2LT, O-1, and was granted Federal Recognition that date.
5. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Personnel Division, NGB. That office recommended approval of the applicants request to be promoted to 1LT effective 15 August 2002 with all due back pay and allowances. That office noted the applicants records contained no derogatory documents that would have made him ineligible for promotion prior to his being transferred to the IRR.
6. A copy of the advisory was provided to the applicant for comment. He did not respond within the given time frame.
7. National Guard Regulation 600-100 prescribes policies and procedures governing, in part, the appointment, Federal Recognition, and separation of commissioned officers of the ARNG. Chapter 8 states the promotion of officers in the ARNG is a function of the State. A commissioned officer promoted by State authorities has a State status in the higher grade under which to function. However, to be extended Federal Recognition in the higher grade, the officer must have satisfied the requirements prescribed in this chapter.
8. National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 8-6, states the wearing of insignia of the higher grade is not authorized until Federal Recognition has been extended by the Chief, National Guard Bureau. Paragraph 8-15 states that an ARNG commissioned officer, not on active duty, who is selected for promotion as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army resulting from mandatory
consideration may be extended Federal Recognition in the higher grade subject to several conditions, including that the officer has reached promotion eligibility date and that the officer is promoted in a State status to fill an appropriate position vacancy in the higher grade.
9. Army Regulation 135-155 provides policy and procedures for the selection and promotion of commissioned officers of the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR). In pertinent part, it states that a 2LT will be considered for promotion without review by a selection board. The officers records will be screened to determine eligibility for promotion to the next higher grade. This will be determined far enough in advance to permit promotion on the date promotion service is completed. For promotion to 1LT, this will be after 2 years of service in the rank of 2LT. A 2LT is normally required to have completed the resident OBC before becoming eligible for promotion to 1LT.
10. Army Regulation 135-155 states promotion reconsideration by a special selection board may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error which existed in the records at the time of consideration.
11. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 14304, states officers shall be placed in the promotion zone for that officers grade and competitive category and shall be considered for promotion to the next higher grade by a promotion board far enough in advance of completing the years of service in grade specified so that, if the officer is recommended for promotion, the promotion may be effective on or before the date on which the officer will complete those years of service. The maximum years of service for promotion to the rank of captain is 5 years.
12. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 14316(d), states that if, on the date on which an officer of the ARNGUS who is on a promotion list as a result of being recommended by a mandatory selection board is to be promoted, the officer has not been promoted to fill a vacancy in the higher grade in the ARNG, the officer's Federal Recognition in the officer's Reserve grade shall be withdrawn and the officer shall be promoted and transferred to the USAR as appropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant was appointed a 2LT in the ARNG effective 15 August 2000. He would have met the time in service requirement for promotion to 1LT on 15 August 2002. The advisory opinion noted the applicants records contained no derogatory documents that would have made him ineligible for promotion prior
to his being transferred to the IRR. Therefore, it would be equitable to show he was promoted to 1LT and granted Federal Recognition as a 1LT effective 15 August 2002 with all due back pay and allowances.
2. If the applicant had been promoted to 1LT in August 2002, he should have been eligible for consideration for promotion to captain with a promotion eligibility date in August 2007.
BOARD VOTE:
__xx____ __xx____ ____xx__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. showing he was promoted to 1LT and granted Federal Recognition as a 1LT effective 15 August 2002 with all due back pay and allowances; and
b. if eligible, submitting his records to a duly constituted special selection board under the applicable criteria for consideration for mandatory promotion to captain.
________xxxx__________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080004059
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080004059
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013513
By memorandum on 2 September 1998, the NGB promoted the applicant to the rank of 1LT as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), effective 1 February 1998, paragraph 4-17 stated a qualified 1LT would not be promoted before the date of completion of 3 years of promotion service with two specified exceptions (neither of which applied to the applicant). Therefore, it would...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020082
His records do not contain the promotion orders showing the promotion date. He provided a memorandum he submitted to the U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 11 June 1999, requesting reconsideration for promotion to CPT. He provided a memorandum he received from an official at the USAR Personnel Command, St Louis, MO, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, dated 3 November 1999, stating this memorandum was in response to his...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010283
The applicant states: a. f. Paragraph 4-31 (Not Qualified for Promotion) states for ARNG officers in the grade of 2LT and USAR officers in the grades of warrant officer one and 2LT: (1) If found not qualified for promotion to the grade chief warrant officer two or 1LT, a final determination will be made by the following: area commanders for unit officers and overseas residents and the Commander, Human Resources Command, St. Louis for all others. The minimum criteria in effect at the time...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003552
The applicants military service record shows he was appointed in the ARNG as an Armor officer, in the grade of 1LT/pay grade O-2, effective and with a DOR of 28 September 2006. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer of the Army, with appointment in the ARNG of the United States, in the grade of 2LT, effective 8 August 1992. b. These documents show, in pertinent part, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003057C070208
The applicant provides his oath of office as a second lieutenant (2LT); orders appointing him a 2LT in the Army National Guard (ARNG); a DA Form 5074-1 (Record of Award of Entry Grade Credit (Health Services Officers)); a request for Federal Recognition packet; initial appointment Federal Recognition orders; a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report); his OBC diploma; orders promoting him to 1LT; a memorandum dated 26 April 2004; his promotion Federal Recognition orders; and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050011134C070206
Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers), effective 1 September 1994, paragraph 4-17 stated a qualified 1LT would not be promoted before the date of completion of 3 years of promotion service with two specified exceptions (neither of which applied to the applicant). Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) provides policy for selecting and promoting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004435
In part, it specifically shows: a. a Human Resources Command (HRC), Fiscal Year (FY) 2010 Reserve Components Mandatory Selection Board (RCSB) convened on 3 November 2009 to consider officers of the applicant's grade for promotion: b. unfortunately, the applicant was not selected for promotion by the board; this was his second non-selection; c. the records reviewed by the DA Selection Board did not indicate that he had completed the required civilian education requirement by the day before...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015869
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). She provided copies of her baccalaureate degree from 21 October 2005 and non-rated periods from May 2004 to October 2005 and February 2006 to February 2008 that she presented to her unit for the Department of the Army (DA) FY 2010 CPT promotion board. Since making their FY 2012 DA CPT promotion list, she has been promoted to CPT as of 15 February 2012, per Order Number B-03-201480, dated 01 March 2012.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017174C070206
In addition, due to the fact that the applicant was not assigned to either the MDARNG or the WIARNG on 17 August 2004, neither headquarters had the authority to promote him on that date. In the advisory opinion the official indicates that the applicant became eligible for promotion to 1LT on 17 August 2004 and adds, in effect, for reasons that can not be determined, the applicant was not promoted when he became eligible for promotion to 1LT. The evidence of records shows that the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013057
The applicant states that he was selected for promotion to CPT by the November 2004 Mandatory Promotion Board and attained the maximum time in grade (TIG) as a first lieutenant (1LT) on 1 April 2005. Memorandum, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, dated 10 March 2005, stated that officers recommended for promotion by mandatory promotion boards will be promoted on the date they attain maximum TIG or upon assignment to a higher grade unit position, whichever is...