Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003917
Original file (20080003917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  10 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080003917 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his date of rank and effective date of promotion to Lieutenant Colonel (LTC)/O-5 be adjusted to 4 December 2004 and that he receive all back pay and allowances.

2.  The applicant states that, due to no fault of his own, he was not promoted to the rank of LTC by a special selection board with an effective date and date of rank of 4 December 2004.  However, Federal Recognition orders for LTC show the effective date and date of rank of 21 December 2007.

3.  The applicant provides his State LTC promotion orders; his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Federal Recognition orders; two memoranda from the U. S. Army Human Resources Command - St. Louis (USAHRC - STL); and a NGB memorandum, dated 12 February 2008.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 25 July 1985, the applicant was appointed as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army in the rank of Second Lieutenant (2LT)/O-1.

2.  NGB Federal Recognition Orders Number 247 AR, dated 24 December 1985, show that the applicant was awarded permanent Federal recognition for initial appointment as a 2LT in the Oklahoma Army National Guard (OKARNG) effective 25 July 1985.  

3.  NGB Federal Recognition Orders Number 233 AR, dated December 1997, show that the applicant was awarded Federal Recognition for the purpose of promotion to Major (MAJ) in the OKARNG effective 5 December 1997.

4.  By memorandum dated 24 July 2007, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, USAHRC – STL informed the Chief, Personnel Division, Army National Guard Readiness Center that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by a board which convened on 16 May 2007 and was selected for promotion with a promotion effective date of 4 December 2004.  

5.  By memorandum dated 15 August 2007, the Chief, Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, USAHRC – STL informed the applicant that he was considered for promotion to LTC by a Standby Advisory Board which convened on 18 January 2007 and was selected for promotion with a promotion eligibility date of 4 December 2004.  He was informed that upon final processing, a promotion letter would be forwarded to him with a date of rank of 4 December 2004. 

6.  OKARNG Orders 334-012, dated 30 November 2007, show that the applicant was promoted to the rank and pay grade of LTC/O-5 with an effective date and date of rank of 15 October 2004.

7.  A NGB memorandum, dated 21 December 2007, show that the applicant was promoted as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army in the rank of LTC for service in the Army National Guard with an effective date and date of rank of 
21 December 2007.

8.  NGB Federal Recognition Orders Number 319 AR, dated 21 December 2007, show that the applicant was awarded Federal Recognition for the purpose of promotion to the grade of LTC in the OKARNG effective 21 December 2007.

9.  On 24 June 2008, the Chief, Federal Recognition Section, NGB informed a Board analyst that due to no fault of his own, the applicant's promotion packet was received at NGB for promotion to LTC along with the Standby Advisory Board memorandum stating that his promotion eligibility date was 4 December 2004.  The office also stated that instead of processing the applicant's orders with the effective date and date of rank of 4 December 2004, his NGB Federal Recognition orders were inadvertently processed with the effective date and date of rank of 21 December 2007.

10.  National Guard Regulation 600-100 (Commissioned Officer-Federal Recognition and Related Personnel Actions) provides procedures for processing all applications for Federal Recognition.  Paragraph 2-1 states commissioned officers of the Army National Guard (ARNG) are appointed by the several States under Article 1, Section 8 of the U. S. Constitution.  These appointments may be federally recognized by the Chief, NGB under such regulations as the Secretary of the Army may prescribe and under the provisions of this regulation.  Officers who are federally recognized in a particular grade and branch shall be tendered an appointment in the same grade as Reserve commissioned officers of the Army with assignment to the Army National Guard of the United States if they have not already accepted such appointment.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by a Standby Advisory Board on 18 January 2007, with a date of rank of 
4 December 2004.  At that time, his Federal Recognition promotion packet and allied documents were forwarded to NGB for Federal Recognition promotion orders.  However, his promotion orders were inadvertently processed with the effective date and date of rank of 21 December 2007.  It is clear that an administrative error caused the applicant's Federal Recognition promotion orders not to show an effective date and date of rank of 4 December 2004.  

2.  In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled to an adjustment of his promotion effective date and date of rank for LTC to 
4 December 2004, with entitlement to back pay and allowances.

BOARD VOTE:

___xx___  __xx  __  __xx  ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  showing he was promoted as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army to the rank of LTC with an effective date and date of rank of 4 December 2004;
	b.  amending Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 319 AR, dated 21 December 2007, to show he was granted Federal Recognition as a LTC effective 4 December 2004; and 

	c.  paying him any back pay and allowances due as a result of these corrections.




      ____xxxxxx____
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003917





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080003917



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004561

    Original file (20110004561.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Certificate showing completion of the JA Officer Basic Course * Statement to the Accession Board * DA Form 330 (Language Proficiency Questionnaire) * Letter of support * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) * Officer Evaluation Report (OER) from 17 October 2007 through 16 September 2008 * Memorandum titled: Application for appointment in the JAGC, [Applicant] * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 89 (Proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board) * NGB Special...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000124C071029

    Original file (20070000124C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Effective 9 November 2006, the applicant was discharged from the ARNG and as a Reserve of the Army. The applicant was discharged from the ARNG effective 1 January 2002 as a result of being twice nonselected for promotion to MAJ. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that his discharge from the Army National Guard of 1 January 2002 is void and of no force or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012083

    Original file (20090012083.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides copies of the following documents: * Two U.S. Army Aviation Center, Fort Rucker, AL course completion certificates dated in October/December 2005 * a U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO (USAHRC-STL) memorandum, subject: Notification of Promotion Status, dated 30 June 2006, notifying him of his non-selection for promotion to MAJ * his memorandum request for an SSB, dated 15 August 2006 * Headquarters Military Department, State of Washington, Camp Murray,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016328C071029

    Original file (20060016328C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a 15 October 1984 letter from the State of California, Office of the Adjutant General to the Commander, 1/143d FA, the unit was informed that a Reserve CPT promotion board would convene on 8 January 1985 and that documents for officers listed on an attached enclosure had not been received. The applicant states that around November 1986 he resigned his Army commission from the USAR. Army Regulation 135-155 (Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090005791

    Original file (20090005791.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Had the applicant known of the former he would never have declined his promotion to CPT. By memorandum, subject "Promotion as a Reserve Officer of the Army," dated 2 April 1996, the applicant elected to delay his promotion to the grade of CPT until 22 May 1997. There is no evidence in the available records that show he was in a CPT's position prior to his declination for promotion to CPT nor is there any evidence that his chain of command mislead him in his promotion to CPT.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060002542C070205

    Original file (20060002542C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides promotion memorandums dated 28 February 2005 and 17 March 2005; a void promotion memorandum dated 28 February 2005; State promotion orders dated 31 May 2005; a National Guard Bureau (NGB) memorandum dated 1 September 2004; an 8 September 2005 letter from the Office of the Inspector General, NGB; active duty orders dated 9 June 2004; deployment orders dated 4 August 2004; and a DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), examination completed on 10 August 2003. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011856

    Original file (20100011856.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 January 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100011856 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides copies of: * a web printout of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 14502 (Special selection boards: correction of errors) * a National Guard Bureau (NGB), Arlington, VA, memorandum, subject Promotion as a Reserve Commissioned Officer of the Army, dated 21 October 2009, for promotion to COL * a U.S. Army Human Resources Command, St. Louis, MO, memorandum,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010630

    Original file (20080010630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 2-6 of this regulation states that officers will be ordered to active duty in their Reserve grade. In view of counsel's response to the advisory opinion (i.e., they agreed that a DOR of 3 May 1999 would have placed the applicant in the ADL primary zone for the fiscal year 2005 LTC Chaplain promotion board that convened on 22 February 2005) it would be equitable at this time to void the applicant's 1 February 2005 discharge from active duty and to show he remained on active duty...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023391

    Original file (20100023391.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Also on 11 March 2010, HRC-STL issued the applicant his promotion to LTC memorandum with an effective date of 11 March 2010. Therefore, the officer may have a maximum time in grade date that is before the approval date of the promotion advisory board/special selection board that recommended him or her for promotion. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending Federal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015450

    Original file (20080015450.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that his non-selection for promotion from captain (CPT) to MAJ was based on him not having a bachelor’s degree, which was unjust given the governing law provided an exception to the civilian education requirement for promotion to MAJ for members who were promoted to CPT before 1 October 1995. Section III of Army regulation 135-155 states that officers' records may be placed before a special selection board (SSB) when it is determined that their records were...