Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002391
Original file (20080002391.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  1 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080002391 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 October 1981 be corrected to show his Reserve Obligation Terminal Date as 7 November 1984 and his rank and grade as Specialist Four (SP4), E-4.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his actual separation date was                   7 November 1984.  He was promoted to SP4, E-4, before separating from the Active Reserve in November 1984.  He was active duty for over 3 years and finished his 6-year term in the Active Reserve.  His DD Form 214 also does not reflect his last unit in Texas. 

3.  The applicant provides two letters of appreciation, one dated 8 May 1979 and one dated 9 March 1981; SP4 orders, dated 30 September 1983; and a letter, dated 4 June 1984.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U. S. Army Reserve (USAR) (not the Delayed Entry Program) on 29 March 1978 for 6 years.  He enlisted in the USAR (Delayed Entry Program) on 21 September 1978.  He enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 October 1978.  

3.  The applicant was advanced to Private First Class, E-3, on 1 August 1979.

4.  On 15 June 1981, the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial of violating a lawful general regulation by wrongfully transferring duty-free goods to a person not authorized duty-free import privileges and of wrongfully and unlawfully making and subscribing under oath a false statement.  He was sentenced to be reduced to the grade of E-1, to be restricted to the limits of Camp Pelham for 60 days, to perform extra duty for 45 days; and to forfeit $300.00 pay per month for 3 months.  On 9 July 1981, the convening authority approved the sentence.

5.  There is no evidence of record to show the court-martial conviction was overturned.

6.  On 26 October 1981, the applicant was honorably released from active duty upon the completion of his required service after completing 3 years and 1 day of creditable active service during that enlistment with 2 days of lost time.  He was transferred to the USAR Control Group (Reinforcement).  

7.  Items 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), and 4b (Pay Grade) of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 October 1981 shows his rank and grade as Private, E-1.    Item 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) shows his last assignment as Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 2d Battalion, 17th Field Artillery, Eighth United States Army, Korea.  Item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) shows his effective date of rank as 9 July 1981 (the date his sentence by court-martial was approved).  Item 12l (Reserve Obligation Terminal Date) shows his Reserve obligation would end on 28 March 1984.  

8.  On or about 11 April 1983, the applicant was assigned to a USAR troop program unit in Texas.  

9.  The applicant was promoted to SP4, E-4 on 30 September 1983.  

10.  On 7 November 1984, the applicant was honorably discharged from the USAR.

11.  Army Regulation 635-5 prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  In pertinent part, it states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.

12.  Army Regulation 135-178 establishes policies governing the administrative separation of enlisted Soldiers from the Army National Guard of the United States and the USAR.  In pertinent part, it states that upon expiration of term of service (ETS) the Soldier will be discharged by the separation authority.  It also states that when through administrative error a Soldier is not discharged on the actual date of his or her ETS, he or she will be considered to have been retained beyond normal discharge date for the convenience of the Government.

13.  Army Regulation 135-91 defines Army National Guard and USAR service obligations.  It states that before 1 June 1984 all personnel incurred a 6-year statutory obligation on initial entry into the Armed Forces, with a few certain exceptions.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is acknowledged that the applicant was not actually discharged from the USAR until 7 November 1984.  His statutory obligation ended 6 years after his initial, 29 March 1978, enlistment.  He was not statutorily obligated to serve beyond 28 March 1984, and there is no evidence of record to show he was contractually obligated to serve beyond that date.  

2.  Since it appears the applicant should have been, but was not, discharged on his actual USAR ETS date, he was considered to have been retained beyond his normal discharge date for the convenience of the Government.  However, his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 October 1981 properly shows his Reserve Obligation Terminal Date as 28 March 1984.

3.  The evidence of record shows that the applicant was convicted by a special court-martial and his sentence, which in part included a reduction to Private, E-1, was approved on 9 July 1981.  

4.  The DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier’s most recent period of continuous active duty and provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  At the time the applicant was released from active duty on 26 October 1981, he was a Private, E-1.  He was not promoted to SP4 until September 1983, after he was released from active duty.  Therefore, his rank of SP4 would not be entered on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 26 October 1981.  For the same reason, 
his last, USAR, unit in Texas would not be reflected on this DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__xxx___  __xxx___  __xxx___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



							XXX
 _   _______   ______________
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002391





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080002391



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007792

    Original file (20080007792.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His records do not show any significant acts of valor during his military service. Army Regulation 635-200 states, in pertinent part, that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army Reenlistment Eligibility Codes (RE codes): a. RE–1, applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009829

    Original file (20130009829.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as specialist four (SP4)/ E-4. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous Active Duty Training (ADT), Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. The available evidence shows he was promoted to SP4/E-4 on 31 January 1983 during his Reserve service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080003161

    Original file (20080003161.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete military records are not available to the Board. A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 13 May 1982, in the applicant’s service personnel records, recommends removal of his bar to reenlistment and his rank is shown as PFC. Department of the Army, U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Center, St. Louis, Missouri Orders D-02-012346, dated 18 February 1986, discharged the applicant from the Ready Reserve effective 19 February 1986 in the rank of SP4.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050010167

    Original file (20050010167.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Larry W. Racster | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) and Item 12b (Separation Date This Period) of his 12 May 1984 separation document (DD Form 214). Therefore, the time for his to file a request for correction of any error or injustice expired on 16 May 1987.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005048

    Original file (20140005048.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his military education and that he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/pay grade E-5. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this military education. Thus, the evidence of record shows the applicant's DD Form 214 shows his correct rank, grade, and effective date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008301

    Original file (20080008301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Items 5a (Rank) and 5b (Pay Grade) of the applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows the entries SP4 and E-4, respectively. There is no evidence in the applicant's records, and the applicant did not provide any evidence, that shows he had an out-of-State job transfer while serving in the Army National Guard. There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant did not submit any evidence that shows he was promoted again to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008502

    Original file (20110008502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * his service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * his rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * completion of military occupational specialty (MOS) 16S Stinger Crewman Transition Training Course * 6 months of training overseas 2. Chapter 2 of Army Regulation 635-5 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states: * items 4a and 4b show the active duty rank and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000154

    Original file (20080000154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 30 June 1980 to show he entered active duty for training (ADT) on 1 November 1977 instead of 1 October 1978. Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), prepared on 22 April 1981 and reviewed by the applicant on 18 October 1981, shows that he was on ADT assigned to the USARE, USASC, Hawaii for the period 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017325C070206

    Original file (20050017325C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the entries at item 12 (Record of Service) on his 6 January 1984 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be completed. The applicant states that the DD Form 214 does not reflect his period of active duty from 28 March 1980 through 11 February 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002047

    Original file (20080002047.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 May 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002047 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that his US Army Reserve (USAR) discharge orders be revoked and that he be transferred to the Retired Reserve. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...