IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 01 July 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080002360
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be reimbursed for all back Survivor Benefit Program (SBP) payments he has made erroneously.
2. The applicant states that he was unaware that he had to suspend his SBP payments when his wife died in 1999 and has continued to pay the premiums. Accordingly, he desires to have the premiums returned to him.
3. The applicant provides a copy of his spouses death certificate.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was born on 2 September 1923 and enlisted in the Regular Army on 7 August 1940. He continued to serve through a series of continuous reenlistments and extensions until he was honorably released from active duty in the pay grade of E-8 on 31 July 1972 and was placed on the Retired List effective 1 August 1972. He had served 31 years, 5 months and 27 days of total active service.
3. The death certificate provided by the applicant shows that his spouse passed away on 30 August 1999 at the age of 79.
4. In the processing of this case a staff member of the Board contacted officials at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to ascertain the applicants current status in regards to SBP payments. Officials at the DFAS indicate that the applicant originally opted for spouse and child, however, the child has aged out and the applicant is currently paying Spouse Only premiums. Additionally, there is no evidence that the applicants spouse passed away or that the applicant notified the DFAS of her death. Officials at the DFAS also stated that upon presentation of a death certificate, the DFAS is only authorized to pay up to 6 years of back premiums under the Barring Statute.
5. Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, repealed the Retired Servicemans Family Protection Plan and established the SBP. The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances. It declared a 12-month Open Season for those members who retired prior to enactment of the law.
6. Public Law 105-261, enacted 17 October 1998, established paid-up coverage under the SBP. Effective 1 October 2008, no reduction may be made in the retired pay of a participant in the SBP for any month after the later of : (1) the 360th month for which the participants retired pay is reduced; or (2) the month during which the participant attains age 70.
7. Title 10, U. S. Code, section 1552, the law which provides for the Board, states, The Secretary may pay, from applicable current appropriations, a claim for the loss of pay, allowances, compensation, emoluments, or other pecuniary benefits, or the repayment of a fine or forfeiture, if, as a result of correcting a record under this section, the amount is found to be due the claimant on account of his or anothers service in the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps or Coast Guard, as the case may be.
8. Title 31, U. S. Code, section 3702, also known as the barring statute, prohibits the payment of a claim against the Government unless the claim has been received by the Comptroller General within 6 years after the claim accrues. Among the important public policy considerations behind statutes of limitations, including the 6-year limitation for filing claims contained in this section of Title 31, U. S. Code, is relieving the government of the need to retain, access, and review old records for the purpose of settling stale claims, which are often difficult to prove or disprove.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. Although the applicant has not provided a reasonable explanation as to why he did not notify DFAS officials of the death of his wife approximately 9 years ago, the fact remains that he continued to pay premiums for what appears to be a benefit that no one was eligible to receive in the event of the applicants death.
2. Therefore, given the applicants 30+ years of honorable service during three periods of war (WWII, Korea and Vietnam) and given his advanced age (84), it would be in the interest of justice in this case to reimburse the applicant all SBP premiums he paid since the death of his spouse on 30 August 1999.
3. However, the applicant is advised that if he has remarried or if he has a valid SBP beneficiary, he should contact DFAS officials immediately to update his records before he receives the refund of premiums in order to avoid any debt associated with this action.
BOARD VOTE:
__XXX __ __XXX__ __XXX__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that the applicant notified the DFAS immediately upon his wifes death. This correction will render the barring act inapplicable and entitle the applicant to a refund of SBP premiums paid since her death.
2. The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during WWII, the Korean War and the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.
___ XXX ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080002360
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080002360
4
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009433
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 19 December 2007, DFAS received the necessary documentation to update the applicants SBP account and her SBP spouse coverage was suspended. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the applicant made a timely request to discontinue the SBP deductions on 14 October 1989 and on 29 July 1995; b. show that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012684
The applicant requests, in effect, to receive a refund of all remaining Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse premiums withheld from his military retired pay after the death of his first wife until SBP coverage was reactivated after his second marriage. The applicant's record contains a DA Form 4240 (Data for Payment of Retired Army Personnel), dated 28 August 1980. The applicant did not file within the 3-year statute of limitations; however, based on the available evidence, it would be in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002143
The applicant married the FSM in "1995," but he did not inform DFAS within a year of the marriage, so the applicant was not eligible. DFAS issued the applicant two payments which were later collected because she was not entitled to an SBP annuity because the FSM was not married at the time of his retirement and had not elected coverage for her within one year of their marriage. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the FSM be corrected by showing that...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003085
A letter from DFAS shows $80.69 was paid in premiums each month in 2000. b. DFAS states the additional money her husband was paying was due to the buy-in premiums or "Open Season" cost. However, only the spouse SBP premiums are refundable through Public Law 92-425. c. Public Law 105-261 states all SBP premiums will be terminated effective 1 October 2008 for all members who are at least 70 years old and have paid SBP premiums for 360 or more months.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013449
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant, L.M.J., the widow and second wife of a deceased retired former service member (FSM), requests reimbursement of Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) premiums that were paid and any necessary corrections that are required to the FSM's records. The response stated: a. the FSM elected to participate in the SBP on 1 October 1973 and elected spouse and child coverage; b. SBP premiums were deducted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019770
d. DFAS records show he had an eligible "spouse" beneficiary for the entire period he paid into the SBP; therefore, neither he nor his children are entitled to a refund of the SBP premiums. Spousal concurrence is needed only when a married person elects to provide an annuity for his spouse at less than the maximum level or to provide an annuity for a dependent child but not for his spouse. Records show that on 20 March 1978, although he had both a wife and dependent children, the applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007341
The applicant, the un-remarried former spouse of a former service member (FSM), requests, in effect, that her ex-husband's records be corrected to show he elected to provide her an annuity as his "former spouse" under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Thus, it would be appropriate to correct the record to show that the FSM changed his SBP election from "spouse" to "former spouse" on the date of his divorce from the applicant, and to provide the applicant all SBP annuity payments due from the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002067415C070402
His notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60 (his 20-year letter) is dated 7 November 1977. Premiums are normally deducted from retired pay. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant completed his DD Form 2656 on 30 September 1996 and declined, with his spouse’s concurrence, to participate in the SBP, making the debt for SBP premiums invalid.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009158
Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1450(f)(3)(A) permits a former spouse to make a written request that an SBP election of former spouse coverage be deemed to have been made when the former spouse is awarded the SBP annuity incident to a proceeding of divorce. There is no evidence the FSM attempted to change his elected SBP from spouse to former spouse prior to his death. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003130
After 28 years (of paying SBP premiums) he was notified that if he died first, she would never receive 55 percent of his retired pay. His retired pay records at the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) show: * he is authorized military retired pay (unknown effective date) but he elected to receive a full VA waiver * his original SBP election was spouse coverage, effective 9 January 1990 * his SBP premiums were suspended due to the death of his spouse in June 2014 10. The SBP...