Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001951
Original file (20080001951.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	

	BOARD DATE:	  8 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080001951 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Air Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should be awarded the Air Medal for numerous artillery raids that were made in support of the 1st Cavalry Division in 1967.  The applicant continues that his unit was awarded this medal at the combat landing zone named Mendenhol by a high ranking cavalry officer on 22 July 1967.  The applicant adds that this medal was not entered on his separation documents.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) in support of this application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's record shows he was inducted into the Army on 27 December 1965.  He completed basic training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Ammo Handler).  The highest rank he attained while serving on active duty was private first class/pay grade E-3.

3.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that, on 6 November 1967, he was honorably separated from active duty as an early overseas returnee and transferred to the United States Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) to complete his service obligation.

4.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Air Medal.

5.  There are no general orders in the applicant's record which show he was awarded the Air Medal.

6.  Item 41 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Air Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Air Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight.  This award is primarily intended for personnel on flying status, but may also be awarded to those personnel whose combat duties require them to fly, for example, personnel in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show award of the Air Medal.

2.  There is no evidence in the available records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence which shows that he was awarded the Air Medal.  Absent evidence to show that during a time of war, the applicant performed acts of heroism or meritorious achievement or service while participating in aerial flight, there is no basis to grant the applicant's request for the Air Medal.  Therefore, the applicant is not entitled to this award.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X___  ___X____  __X_ ____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned to award the Air Medal.



	_________X___________
	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001951





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001951



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017852

    Original file (20110017852.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    CIB orders are on file in the applicant's record and therefore the CIB should be added to his DD Form 214. The applicant's record is void of AM orders or other documentation indicating it was ever recommended or awarded; however, by regulation, eligibility for the AM is established for members whose combat duties require them to fly, which includes those in the attack elements of units involved in air-land assaults against an armed enemy and those directly involved in airborne command and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006460

    Original file (20110006460.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, he was awarded the Air Medals during his service in the Republic of Vietnam; however, they are not reflected on his DD Form 214. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence upon which to base correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the Air Medal (with numeral 3). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; and b. adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016904

    Original file (20140016904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no orders in the applicant’s military personnel records that show he was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant provides a letter of support which states, in effect: * the writer served in Vietnam with the applicant * they were both assigned to Troop D, 2nd Platoon, 1st Squadron, 9th Cavalry, 1st Cavalry Division (Airmobile) * when he arrived in Vietnam he was assigned to a 106 millimeter recoilless rifle jeep as a loader * the gunner in his jeep was the applicant *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008264

    Original file (20090008264.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and the Air...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015158

    Original file (20110015158.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    7. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Air Medal pertaining to the applicant. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that the Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012938

    Original file (20100012938.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show two awards of the Air Medal and the Basic Aviation Badge (formerly known as the Aircraft Crew Member Badge). The applicant’s service record does not contain any orders for award of the Air Medal. Although the applicant provided award certificates for the Air Medal, absent orders authorizing him two awards of the Air Medal these documents alone are not sufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017604

    Original file (20130017604.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain any evidence showing he served with or was assigned to the 3rd Marine Division. The applicant's records do not contain and he has not provided orders or a recommendation for award of the Air Medal. There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided evidence to show he was assigned or transferred to the 3rd Marine Division or met qualification for award of the Air Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022270

    Original file (20110022270.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 August 1967 and he held military occupational specialty 12B (Combat Engineer). U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided guidelines for award of the Air Medal. In the absence of orders or other independent evidence that would confirm he completed the number of missions necessary to be awarded the Air Medal, there is insufficient evidence upon which to correct his DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012998

    Original file (20080012998.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) effective 14 September 1969 to show award of the Bronze Star Medal with two Oak Leaf Clusters and "V" Device, Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with a silver service star and two bronze service stars, [Republic of] Vietnam Campaign Medal [with 1960 Device], Air Medal with 33 Oak Leaf Clusters, Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Pistol Bar, and any...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002668

    Original file (20090002668.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Air Medal. The applicant's records do not contain any evidence that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the Air Medal by proper authority. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There are no flight records or other evidence to show the applicant accumulated the required flight hours or flew on the required number of missions to be awarded the Air Medal.