Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001913
Original file (20080001913.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  22 July 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080001913 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show that he was separated for physical disability with severance pay prior to his transfer to the Retired Reserve.  

2.  The applicant states that his illnesses and injuries were diagnosed and treated while he was still actively serving. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of his permanent profile dated 17 April 2003; Memorandum from the Illinois Army and Air National Guard (ILARNG) dated 
18 April 2003; Orders 131-016, State of Illinois, dated 11 May 2003; Memorandum with enclosures from the National Guard Bureau, dated 
13 January 2006; Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision dated 
7 December 2007; and a Correction to NGB Form 22 dated 20 February 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 24 February 1993, the applicant enlisted in the ILARNG.  He was promoted to sergeant, pay grade E-5 in 1995.  He held a primary military occupational specialty (PMOS) of 92A (Automotive Logistics Specialist).

2.  On 17 April 2003, the applicant received a permanent physical profile indicating that he was medically unfit for military duty.  


3.  On 18 April 2003, the Military Personnel Officer, ILARNG wrote a memorandum informing the applicant that he had been found unfit for retention in the Army National Guard.  This memorandum also informed him of his right to appeal this finding to the Army Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).  He was provided a 60 day period in which to respond.  There is no evidence of record showing that the applicant ever responded to this memorandum.

4.  Orders 131-016, ILARNG, dated 11 May 2003, discharged the applicant from the ILARNG and transferred him the Retired Reserve, effective 16 May 2003.  These orders show that he was immediately eligible for Gray Area Retiree Benefits and full retired benefits at age 60.

5.  On 13 December 2005, this Board considered the applicant’s request to correct his military records to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve.  Accordingly, the Board recommended correction of his NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service in the Army National Guard of Illinois) to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve. 

6.  On 20 February 2007, the National Guard Bureau, issued an NGB Form 22A correcting the applicant’s NGB 22 to show that he was transferred to the Retired Reserve effective 16 May 2003.

7.  On 7 December 2007, the VA rendered a rating decision granting the applicant service connection for a right index finger injury (zero percent disabling) and for hypertension (10 percent disabling).  The VA did not grant service connection for residuals of a neck injury or for residuals of a right knee surgery.  This rating decision also confirmed and continued a previous denial of service connection for type II diabetes mellitus and deferred any decision regarding compensation for excessive scar tissue pending the receipt of additional evidence.  

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) provides, in pertinent part, that members of the Reserve Components may forfeit disability severance pay and be transferred to the Retired Reserve and receive non-disability retired pay at age 60.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant was notified that he had been found medically unfit for retention in the military, and was informed of his right to appeal.  However, there is no evidence showing that he ever acknowledged this notice or that he had elected to appeal the decision.
2.  Although the VA has granted service connection for physical conditions that it considers were incurred on active duty, there is no available evidence showing that he was unable to perform his duties during a period of active duty service.

3.  The applicant was transferred to the Retired Reserve and is entitled to receive non-disability retirement benefits at age 60.  Any severance pay would have to be recouped after he reached age 60 and began drawing non-disability retired pay.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

5.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




________ _   X_______   ____
       CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080001913



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001892

    Original file (20150001892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He confirmed that he entered the CLRP on 8 April 2010, the request was approved and documentation executed, and the applicant entered the AGR program on 18 July 2010 when Soldiers could retain their incentive as an AGR or Mil-Tech. There is no evidence of record of any other anniversary payments. The evidence of record shows the applicant accepted an AGR position with a 3-year active duty commitment beginning 18 July 2010 and he performed the duties of Officer Strength Manager – Recruiter...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009601

    Original file (20110009601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his home of record (HOR) as Illinois. The applicant's request to have his DD Form 214 corrected to show his HOR as Illinois was carefully considered. Although contemporary DD Forms 214 show the HOR, the DD Form 214 the applicant was issued at the time of his separation did not have any provisions for entering the HOR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009860

    Original file (20080009860.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Other Soldiers who also went before the QRP Board were retained despite their APFT failures. Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 20 December 2001; j. memorandum, Notification of Qualitative Retention Review, undated; k. Departments of the Army and Air Force, ILARNG, Memorandum, dated 10 April 203, Non-selection for Continued Unit Participation; l. Enlisted Qualitative Retention Personnel Summary; m. DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record); n. DA Form 705 (Army Physical...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090557C070212

    Original file (2003090557C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT STATES : In the applicant's original 10 November 1999 application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), he stated, in effect, that he should have been allowed to serve until the end of his enlistment, that he was discharged due to his age, and that his enlistment contract was breached. Department of Military Affairs, State of Illinois Orders Number 104-87, dated 29 May 1996 show that the applicant was discharged from the Army National Guard and transferred...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007632

    Original file (20080007632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Chief recommended that the request for continuance on active duty not be favorably considered due to the physical impairment described on the attached DA Form 199 (PEB Proceedings) and in available medical records. Army Regulation 635-40 also provides that a Soldier may be separated with severance pay if the Soldier's disability is rated at less than 30 percent, if the Soldier has less than 20 years of service as defined in Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1208, and if the Soldier's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008824

    Original file (20090008824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 March 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. On 16 January 2008, he was granted Federal recognition to the rank of MAJ. 5. The applicant also has a responsibility to ensure that his records are accurate and up to date for review by selection boards, and the evidence submitted by the applicant and the evidence of record do not provide specific explanations as to who or what was the cause of the inconsistencies noted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000492C070206

    Original file (20050000492C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to her records to show eligibility for retirement benefits. Prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The evidence of record shows the applicant was found medically unfit for retention in the ILARNG and separated on 18 July 2003.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001123

    Original file (20120001123.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show his entitlement to retired pay and associated benefits at age 60. On 2 June 1970, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) and he served until he was discharged on 10 September 1972. Army Regulation 135-180 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service), paragraph 2-1a, states that to be eligible for retired pay an individual does not need to have a military status at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012064

    Original file (20070012064.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5 from 24 March 2005 to 15 September 2003 or a date to be determined by the Board based on the evidence provided. National Guard Bureau, Arlington, Virginia, Memorandum, dated 16 December 2003, subject: Army National Guard (ARNG) Promotion Process for Commissioned Officers, provides guidance to The Adjutants General (TAG) on the procedures for requesting Federal recognition of first lieutenant, DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080008711

    Original file (20080008711.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080008711 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. j. Tab J – NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service), multiple DA Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty), ARNG Retirement Points History Statement prepared on 29 April 2008. k. Tab K – 16 April 2008 letter from the applicant to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records. The QRB met and considered the records of 17 E-9's in...