Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000974
Original file (20080000974.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000974 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that a U. S. Army Criminal Investigation Command (CID) Report of Investigation, dated 11 February 1992, be removed from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the charge was dismissed for lack of evidence, that the disposition was determined to be a “Dead Docket,” and that no conviction was levied.  He contends that the CID report may prohibit and have a negative influence on his career if left in his records. 

3.  The applicant provides a DA Form 67-9 (Officer Evaluation Report) for the period covered from 26 October 2006 to 10 July 2007 and a Courts Automated Tracking System Disposition Query, dated 20 August 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 5 May 1985.  

2.  A CID Report of Investigation, dated 11 February 1992, shows the applicant was apprehended by civil authorities in Georgia on 31 January 1992 and charged with possession of crack cocaine after purchasing crack cocaine from an undercover police officer posing as a drug dealer.     

3.  There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant received any disciplinary action.  

4.  The applicant was promoted to captain on 10 February 2005.

5.  A review of the applicant’s OMPF on the Integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of the CID report in question.  

6.  In support of his claim, the applicant provided a Courts Automated Tracking System Disposition Query, dated 20 August 2007, which shows his violation of the Georgia Controlled Substance Act was dismissed as a “Dead Docket” on 
21 October 1997.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/
Records) prescribes the policies governing the OMPF, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and the Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Table 2-1 of the regulation provides, in pertinent part, that 
authenticated extracts of completed investigation reports that have resulted in elimination or disciplinary action will be filed in the commendatory and disciplinary section.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The governing regulation states that completed investigation reports that have resulted in elimination or disciplinary action will be filed in the commendatory and disciplinary section.  Since there is no evidence or record which shows the applicant received any disciplinary action, the CID report should be removed from his OMPF. 

BOARD VOTE:

RL____  __GP____  _SF_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing the CID Report of Investigation, dated 11 February 1992, from his OMPF.

2.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, following completion of the administrative corrections directed herein, this Record of Proceedings and all documents related to this appeal be returned to this Board for permanent filing.




      ____         RL__________
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000974


2


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010685

    Original file (20140010685 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. On 15 November 2004, CID initiated an investigation pertaining to the applicant's wrongful use of a controlled substance based on a 1 November 2004 command directed urinalysis. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020854

    Original file (20130020854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130020854 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) relating to wrongful use and possession of a controlled substance from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). A letter from a Fort Eustis CID warrant officer, dated 11 April 2002, states the applicant contacted him in relation to the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021608

    Original file (20140021608.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of her previously denied request for removal of a DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report (AER)) for the period 16 February through 17 June 2011 from her official military personnel file (OMPF) or in the alternative transfer of the AER in question to the restricted portion of her OMPF. The comments portion of the report stated, in part: a. she was the subject of a substantiated Criminal Investigation Division (CID) investigation in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018203

    Original file (20110018203.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, the removal of Permanent Orders 190-012, issued by Headquarters, Special Troops Battalion - Korea, dated 10 July 2009, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) for the period 23 September 1998 to 22 September 2001 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records), provides in Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) that award orders are filed in the Commendatory and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017409

    Original file (20080017409.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ [Uniform Code of Military Justice]) imposed on 27 July 2006 be removed from his record. A review of the applicant’s service section of his official military personnel file (OMPF) and his military personnel records jacket (MPRJ) on the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System revealed a copy of the DA Form 2627 in question contained in the case files for approved separations. The...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017028

    Original file (20110017028.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DA Form 268 (Report to Suspend Favorable Personnel Action (FLAG)), dated 16 February 2006, be retroactively removed from his official military personnel file (OMPF) as of the date his Article 15 punishment was completed in October 2007; c. The DA Form 268, dated 2 September 2008, be retroactively removed from his OMPF as of the date of issue; d. Any reference to a Board of Inquiry (BOI) be removed from his OMPF; e. He be given the opportunity to attend the Captain's Career Course; f. His...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100029361

    Original file (20100029361.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It further indicates that regardless of the characterization of the offense as founded, unfounded, or insufficient evidence, the only way to administratively remove a titling action from the Defense Central Investigations Index (DCII) is to show either mistaken identity or a complete lack of credible evidence to dispute the initial titling determination. The case number provided by the applicant is not a record of arrest. The evidence of record confirms that the results of a CID...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018948

    Original file (20140018948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The filing document shows the applicant was notified of the GOMOR, but did not respond. Chapter 3 (OMPF), paragraph 3-6 (Authority for filing or removing documents from the OMPF), in pertinent part, provides that once properly filed in the OMPF, the document will not be removed from the record unless directed by one of the following, and shows in pertinent part, the Army Review Boards Agency, Army Board for Correction of Military Records, Army Discharge Review Board, Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1996 | 9605941C070209

    Original file (9605941C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    A 20 November 1990 AER from the software analyst, MOS 74F, BNCOC at Fort Gordon, Georgia, shows that she was administratively released from the course because she failed written and hands-on portion [of the course], with a recommendation that she be allowed to work in her MOS before attending the course again. She stated, in effect, that because of overstrength in MOS 74F at Fort Gordon, she did not have the opportunity to work in that MOS, and coupled with the fact that she was recently...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120004979

    Original file (20120004979.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. As such, the GOMOR was correctly filed in the performance section of his OMPF.