RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 06 MAY 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080000443
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.
Director
Analyst
The following members, a quorum, were present:
Chairperson
Member
Member
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his promotion eligibility date (PEB) and date of rank to Lieutenant colonel (LTC) be amended from 13 September 2006 to
15 April 2006, in order to be fairly considered for promotion to the next higher grade.
2. The applicant states that a series of administrative and clerical errors due to no fault of his own resulted in a 5 month delay in submitting his vacancy promotion packet for Federal Recognition consideration. He states this injustice can be corrected by amending his PEB from 13 September 2006 to 15 April 2006.
3. The applicant provides a copy of a memorandum from the Michigan Army National Guard Joint Force Headquarters dated 11 October 2007; memorandum for record dated 4 October 2007; memorandum from the Commanding General, 177th Military Police Brigade dated 25 September 2007; National Guard Bureau (NBG) Permanent Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 236 AR dated
15 September 2006; State of Michigan, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Order Number 194-066 dated 13 July 2006 with Federal Recognition Examining Board Proceedings; and the State of Michigan, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Order Number 110-018 dated 20 April 2006 with Federal Recognition Examining Board proceedings.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicants military personnel record shows he was appointed in the Reserve as a second lieutenant effective 21 July 1986. He was appointed in the Army National Guard of the State of Michigan as a first lieutenant effective
18 May 1990, and promoted to major effective 3 May 2000.
3. His personnel record shows he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom. He served a tour of duty in Cuba during the period 10 August 2003 to 30 May 2004. He was honorably released from active duty and transferred to Headquarters and Headquarters Company (HHC),
177th Military Police Brigade, on 22 June 2004.
4. The memorandum from the Michigan Army National Guard Joint Force Headquarters, requests the applicant's PEB be amended because the delay in his promotion was as a result of administrative errors through no fault of his own and also, because his promotion packet was boarded incorrectly on 19 April 2006.
5. State of Michigan, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Order Number 110-018 dated 20 April 2006 shows that the applicant was promoted to LTC effective 19 April 2006.
6. His personnel record shows he was considered and selected for promotion to a position vacancy in the rank of LTC by the Federal Recognition Board, which convened on 13 July 2006. The Secretary of Defense approved the board results and the applicant was promoted effective 13 September 2006.
7. Department of Military and Veterans Affairs Order Number 110-018 dated
20 April 2006, was revoked by Orders Number 284-047 dated 11 October 2007.
8. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB dated 26 December 2007. NGB recommends that the ABCMR deny the applicant's request to amend his effective date of promotion and date of rank since his promotion was based on a position vacancy position. The recommendation further states that his promotion effective date is the date the Secretary of Defense approved and signed the promotion scroll list. The Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act states that the effective date of promotion and date of rank for an officer who is promoted under the position vacancy promotion system will be the date the Chief, NBG extends Federal Recognition, based on the approved list date from the Secretary of Defense. Promotion effective date is not the date of appointment into the position, nor is the date of the Federal Recognition State Board.
9. The applicant was provided a copy of the opinion on 9 January 2008 for comments, but no response was received.
10. Army Regulation 135-155, Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General officers, requires the mandatory consideration of United States Army Reserve commissioned officers for promotion to the next higher grade at specified times in their careers as determined by the officer's years in grade and years of commissioned service. While promotion consideration is mandatory, selection for promotion is contingent on an officer meeting promotion eligibility requirements and whether he or she has successfully participated in Reserve training. Mandatory promotion consideration to LTC occurs at 7 years time in grade as a major.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant requests that his PEB and date of rank to LTC be amended from 13 September 2006 to 15 April 2006, in order to be fairly considered for promotion to the next higher grade.
2. The evidence shows the State of Michigan Federal Recognition Board convened on 20 April 2006 to select the applicant for a promotion vacancy position, which was later proved to be incorrectly processed. Those orders were revoked on 11 October 2007. Another Federal Recognition Board was convened on 13 July 2006, which resulted in the applicant being granted Federal Recognition.
3. On 15 September 2006, the NGB Special Orders Number 236 AR granted Federal recognition to the applicant effective 13 September 2006 for the purpose of promotion to LTC. Regardless of the delay in the processing of the promotion packet, the promotion effective date is not the date of appointment into the position, nor is the date of the Federal Recognition State Board. The promotion effective date is the date the Secretary of Defense approved and signed the promotion scroll list.
4. It is noted that the applicant was selected for promotion by a unit vacancy board prior to the date of his mandatory promotion consideration date.
5. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must satisfactorily show, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to submit sufficient evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ___X____ __X____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_________X_____________
CHAIRPERSON
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080000443
2
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002623
g. Electronic mail (email) dated 8 February 2007, 12 January 2007, 18 October 2006, and 12 October 2006. h. DMNA Form 188-2-R (Request for Orders), dated 4 April 2004, that requested orders promoting the applicant to LTC. Although the applicant was already promotable to LTC and had been notified as such on 7 October 2005, the CY 2005 LTC RCSB erroneously considered him and selected him for promotion by that board with an effective DOR of either 5 April 2005, or the date Federal Recognition...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010686
The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) for lieutenant colonel (LTC) from 27 May 2008 to what it would have been had his records been evaluated by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 LTC Reserve Components (RC)/ Army Promotion List (APL) Selection Board. The applicant states that the correction of his DOR for major was directed by the Board, but that the correction was not completed until February 2008. The opinion further states that In accordance with the Reserve Officer...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017700
The applicant provided a copy of an earlier Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) letter, dated 4 September 2008, in support of his request. On 3 May 2007, in response to the applicants petition, dated 21 August 2006, to the ABCMR to adjust his DOR to MAJ from 16 August 2006 to 24 September 2003, the ABCMR rendered a favorable decision and recommended the applicants records be corrected by amending Federal Recognition Special Orders Number 209 AR, dated 16 August 2006, to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023927
The 17 December 2003 memorandum went on to state that a mobilized ARNG of the United States officer covered by this policy memorandum who has been recommended for promotion to the next higher grade by a mandatory promotion board and who is on an approved promotion list may be promoted immediately when appointed in the State against a vacant position of the higher grade in a federally recognized unit in the National Guard. Evidence shows the applicant was selected for promotion to LTC by the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001430
His promotion eligibility date (PED) to LTC was 26 September 2006, but the Army failed to comply with the prior Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) finding to consider him at the 2007 AMEDD LTC Board. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Regardless of the error contained in the unit vacancy board promotion order, the fact remains that since the applicant is not eligible for mandatory promotion consideration to LTC, the Boards prior decision does not effect his unit vacancy...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080017298
The opinion stated that the effective date of promotion for an Army National Guard commissioned officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal Recognition. NGR 600-100 states that the promotion of officers in the Army National Guard is a function of the State and that the effective date of promotion for an Army National Guard officer who is promoted in the State is the date the Chief, National Guard Bureau extends Federal Recognition,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 December 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070010029 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. State of Michigan, Department of Military and Veterans Affairs, Lansing, Michigan, Orders 277-006, dated 4 October 2006, assigning the applicant to the Retired Reserve; c. National Guard Bureau, Special Orders Number...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015760
National Guard Regulation 600-100, paragraph 10-15b states that temporary Federal Recognition may be granted by an Federal Recognition Board to those eligible when the board finds that the member has successfully passed the examination prescribed herein, has subscribed to the oath of office, and has been appointed by a State order for assignment to a position vacancy in a federally recognized unit of the ARNG. Records show the applicant was granted temporary Federal Recognition effective 16...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001243
b. DA Personnel Policy Guidance (PPG), dated 28 June 2011, paragraph 13-10(b)(3)(d) states "a mobilized officer who is selected for promotion by a DA mandatory promotion board and is on an approved promotion list shall (if not promoted sooner or removed from the promotion list by the President or declination) be promoted without regard to the existence of a vacancy, on the date on which the officer completes the maximum years of service in grade as indicated on table 1." The applicant...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011758
The applicant requests that his date of rank (DOR) to the rank of lieutenant colonel (LTC) be adjusted to 19 December 2007 (7 years after his date of promotion to major) or 27 November 2007 (the date he was eligible by Department of the Army (DA) Personnel Policy Guidance (PPG)). The applicant referenced the DA PPG, dated 14 May 2007, which states, "By law, all Reserve Component officers, mobilized or non-mobilized, whose promotions are not voluntarily delayed, involuntarily delayed, or...