Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000442
Original file (20080000442.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  15 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000442 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.




Director



Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:




Chairperson



Member



Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

2.  The applicant states that his records were not updated.  

3.  The applicant provides personnel statements and a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 11 September 1968.  At the completion of basic combat training and advanced individual training, he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (light weapons infantryman). He was later (in December 1969) reclassified into MOS 71L (administrative specialist).  

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he was assigned to Vietnam on 6 March 1969 with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion (Airmobile), 506th Infantry as a rifleman in duty MOS 11B.

4.  A Veterans Administration Form 07-3101 (Request for Information) indicates the applicant was treated for a dislocated shoulder in April 1969.  This form and his DA Form 20 show he was medically evacuated from Vietnam on 9 May 1969. (His pre-induction physical examination indicated he had a history of left shoulder dislocation.)  He was credited with participation in the Tet 69 Counteroffensive Campaign.  

5.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 13 April 1970.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 3 days of active military service.
6.  His DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Korea), the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, and the Vietnam Service Medal as authorized awards.  

7.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam.  This document shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by Headquarters, Department of the Army General Orders Number 43, dated 1970.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the CIB is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS.  They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size.  The Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command has advised, in similar cases, that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11F, 11G, or 11H.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was awarded MOS 11B and performed duties in MOS 11B as a rifleman while assigned to an infantry unit in Vietnam.  However, there is insufficient evidence which indicates he served in active ground combat during his assignment in Vietnam.  Therefore, he has not met all of the requirements for award of the CIB.  

2.  The applicant was assigned to a unit during a period it was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, this foreign unit award should be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 currently reflects award of the Vietnam Service Medal.  He received credit for participation in one campaign during the Vietnam War.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show one bronze service star for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative errors which do not require action by the Board.  Therefore, administrative correction of 
the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

PM______  JH______  KJ______  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board determined that administrative errors in the records of the individual should be corrected.  Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and one bronze service star for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal on his DD Form 214. 




                      PM________
                CHAIRPERSON
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000442


2


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001063622C070421

    Original file (2001063622C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22, Military Awards, provides, in pertinent part, that one bronze service star is authorized for the Vietnam Service Medal for each campaign when assigned for duty with a unit during the period in which it participated in combat, or was under order to such unit in a combat zone. Therefore, the Board is of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to the award of the CIB. However, evidence of record shows the applicant served during eight campaigns during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100341C070208

    Original file (2004100341C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure to timely file. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing that he was awarded the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 19 September 1966 to 2 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019253

    Original file (20120019253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he should be awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 3 January 1968 to 14 December 1969 and this award should be added to his DD Form 214. Accordingly, he is not entitled to correction of his record to show award of the BSM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b. awarding him...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012557

    Original file (20060012557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060012557 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states he was awarded the CIB in Vietnam but it was not recorded on his DD Form 214. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence as a basis to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010204

    Original file (20090010204.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the National Defense Service Medal (NDSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Air Medal (AM), CIB, Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-14 and M-16) and Machinegun (M-60) Bars, and two overseas service bars. Thus, these awards should also be added to his record and DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006691

    Original file (20070006691.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records show that he entered active duty on 10 November 1968. The applicant requests correction to his records to show the award of the CIB. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation, Valorous Unit Award, and four bronze service stars to be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021855

    Original file (20110021855.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant also provided a certificate which shows he was awarded the CIB. His DD Form 214 shows he received the following awards: * BSM * Army Commendation Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * 2 overseas service bars 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the VSM from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070003247

    Original file (20070003247.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that his records do not show that he was awarded the CIB. Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018118

    Original file (20070018118.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    This individual states that he can verify that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for service with the 506th Infantry Regiment in the RVN in 1971. The applicant's contention that he was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service with the 506th Infantry Regiment in the RVN and that this award should be added to his record was carefully considered. If the applicant did receive the ARCOM, as indicated by him and his former commander in the RVN, it was likely an interim award pending the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070006935

    Original file (20070006935.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was awarded the CIB while he was assigned to the 4th Infantry Division, but he did not have any orders for the award. The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation,...