Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000420
Original file (20080000420.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  3 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000420 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mrs. Nancy L. Amos

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Ms. Carmen Duncan

Chairperson

Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas

Member

Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states that he was wounded on 5 May 1969 by enemy fire/rockets/mortars with injuries to his abdomen, pelvis, and colon.  He has received Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) disability compensation for his wounds.  He was too young to understand the importance of the award.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge); a VA Form 21-0781a (Statement in Support of Claim for Service Connection for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Secondary to Personal Trauma); a Narrative Summary; and a DA Form 8-275-2 (Clinical Record Cover Sheet).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 29 May 1968.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 62E (Crawler Tractor Operator).

3.  The applicant arrived in Vietnam and was assigned to Company B, 14th Engineer Battalion on 6 November 1968.  On 21 January 1969, he was reassigned to the 59th Engineer Company.  He departed Vietnam on or about    5 May 1969 after being credited with participation in two campaigns.

4.  The applicant provided a Narrative Summary that indicates he suffered a multiple fragment wound of the abdomen with perforation of the ascending colon on 5 May 1969 as a result of hostile forces mortar fragments.

5.  The applicant’s name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster.  Item      40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded in action.

6.  A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status) was completed on 11 June 1969.  The initial findings were that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action from a rocket or mortar attack.  The final findings were that he was injured when he was struck by shrapnel from an M-79 (grenade launcher) round.  The explosion resulted when an accidental discharge of an M-79 was made by another Soldier.

7.  The applicant was honorably released from active duty on 28 May 1970, in the rank and grade of Specialist Four, E-4 after completing 2 years of creditable active service with no lost time.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-14 and Rifle M-16), the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), one overseas bar, and the National Defense Service Medal.

8.  The applicant’s records contain no derogatory information.  His conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his service.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by a medical officer, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation.  Authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate campaign or service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal.  

11.  Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations.  It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  At the time, a Soldier’s conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as “excellent” for the entire period of qualifying service.

12.  Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced   award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U. S. Military Assistance Command and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters,        U. S. Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  It is acknowledged that the initial findings into the circumstances surrounding the applicant’s injuries were that they were caused by fragments from enemy mortar or rocket rounds.  However, the final findings were that he was injured when he was struck by shrapnel from an M-79 round when another Soldier accidentally discharged an M-79.  Regrettably, since the final findings were that the applicant was not injured as the result of enemy action, he does not meet the eligibility criteria for award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant completed 2 years of creditable active service with no lost time. He has no derogatory information in his records and his conduct and efficiency were rated as “excellent” throughout his service.  It appears he met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant was credited with participation in two campaigns and therefore is eligible to wear two bronze service stars on his Vietnam Service Medal.

4.  All units were later awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.  Therefore, this unit award should be added to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__cd____  __lmd___  __jcr___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

     a.  awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 29 May 1968 through 28 May 1970; and

     b.  amending his DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and to show he is eligible to wear two bronze service stars on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart.  




__Carmen Duncan_______
          CHAIRPERSON

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011742

    Original file (20140011742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024931

    Original file (20100024931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders in his military personnel records awarding him the Purple Heart during his period of service in Vietnam. Despite that there are no orders awarding him the Purple Heart, his former unit commander and a former service member confirmed the applicant was struck by shrapnel from a mortar round on 14 May 1969, in Vietnam, as a result of hostile action and received treatment by medical authorities. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017834

    Original file (20100017834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was wounded on 5 December 1968 as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal; b....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070012962

    Original file (20070012962.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are no general orders that show the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart; there is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action or treated for such wounds; and the applicant's name is not listed on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003778

    Original file (20090003778.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The rating decision states the applicant had been treated for a wound he sustained to his left knee in February 1969. The applicant was wounded a second time in the left knee, in February 1969. While the evidence shows he received treatment by medical personnel for a wound that he sustained to his left knee, there is no evidence that shows he was wounded as a result of hostile action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060001429C070205

    Original file (20060001429C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's second DD Form 214 does not show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 6 November 1968 and the Republic of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013986

    Original file (20070013986.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    Although the applicant was wounded by a piece of shrapnel while serving in the Republic of Vietnam, there is no corroborating evidence present in the available records which shows that the applicant was wounded as the result of a hostile action. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. Records show the applicant participated in four campaigns...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011295

    Original file (20070011295.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 27 May 1970, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 22 July 1969...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007589

    Original file (20130007589.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows award of the Bronze Star Medal; however, the orders announcing his award of this medal clearly show it was with "V" device. This evidence is a sufficient basis upon which to award him the Purple Heart and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 7 November 1967; b. deleting award of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018837

    Original file (20080018837.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected by adding his award of the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's official records shows that he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his entire service and his records are void of any derogatory information that could serve to disqualify him for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department...