Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000190
Original file (20080000190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  5 June 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000190 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he was promoted to master sergeant, pay grade E-8 and that he completed 20 or more years of active duty service.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that it took from 1981 to 1988 to correct his records and that he was still subject to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).  So that time should count as active duty.  He also contends that he was up for promotion to master sergeant and should be granted that promotion.  In 1980, he tried to reenlist but was denied due to a bar to reenlistment. 

3.  The applicant provides no supporting documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  At the time of his application, the applicant was retired from the Regular Army due to physical disability, in the rank of sergeant first class, pay grade E-7, with 18 years, 1 month, and 10 days active duty service.  

3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 March 1963.  He served through a series of enlistments with assignments both in the United States and overseas.  

4.  On 1 July 1974, the applicant was promoted to sergeant first class, pay grade E-7.

5.  On 2 October 1975, the applicant reenlisted in the Regular Army.  This enlistment was subsequently extended multiple times until his scheduled expiration of term of service (ETS) on 23 April 1981.

6.  On 15 August 1977, 18 August 1978, and on 22 August 1980, the applicant’s records were forwarded for consideration for promotion to master sergeant, pay 
grade E-8.  There is no evidence showing that he was recommended for promotion.

7.  On 10 September 1980, the applicant refused to meet time-in-service requirements for an overseas assignment to the Federal Republic of Germany because he felt that he was medically unfit for the assignment.  

8.  On 23 September 1980, due to the applicant's refusal to meet the service requirements for the overseas assignment, the Military Personnel Center placed him in a non-promotable status and barred him to further extension or reenlistment for a period of 93 days following his ETS of 21 April 1981.  

9.  On 21 April 1981, he was discharged with an honorable characterization of service due to completion of required service.  He had completed 18 years, 
1 month, and 10 days of creditable active duty.

10.  On 9 December 1987, this Board considered and granted the applicant’s request to change his discharge to a retirement due to physical disability.  

11.  On 20 May 2005, the applicant submitted another application to this Board.  In a letter dated 14 March 2006, he was informed by the Director of this Board, that his application was unclear as to exactly what it was he wanted corrected.  He was also informed that after his discharge on 21 April 1981 he no longer had a military status and was not subject to the UCMJ. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant served a total of 
18 years, 1 month, and 10 days of creditable active duty and was retired due to physical disability.  There is no evidence showing that the applicant had any additional active duty service.  

2.  The applicant’s records were considered three times for promotion to master sergeant, pay grade E-8 prior to his discharge and subsequent retirement.  There is no evidence showing that he was recommended for promotion.  Furthermore, he was barred to extension or reenlistment due to his refusal to meet the service requirements for an overseas assignment and placed in a non-promotable status.

3.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request for additional active duty service credit and promotion to master sergeant, pay grade E-8 should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



	__________X_____________
      	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070016793



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000190



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707398C070209

    Original file (9707398C070209.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    Member The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. On 12 October 1993 the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of reckless driving and violation of two general regulations, i.e, consuming alcohol within 6 hours of a vehicle accident and failing to immediately notify military or civilian police of an accident. ________SIGNED________ CHAIRPERSON SFMR-RBR S: 22 March 1999 15 January 1999 MEMORANDUM FOR...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY1997 | 9707398

    Original file (9707398.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Member The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army on 18 November 1981 for 3 years. On 12 October 1993 the applicant was convicted by a summary court-martial of reckless driving and violation of two general regulations, i.e, consuming alcohol within 6 hours of a vehicle accident and failing to immediately notify military or civilian police of an accident.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010570

    Original file (20100010570.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), in pertinent part, shows in: a. item 5 (Oversea Service) that he served for 3 months in Korea from 24 July 1978 through 1 November 1978; b. item 6 (Military Occupational Specialties) that he was awarded primary MOS 12B1O on 12 May 1977; c. item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) that he was: * promoted to SP4/E-4 with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 October 1978 * promoted to SGT/E-5 with a DOR of 12 April 1980 * reduced to SP4/E-4 with a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120017679

    Original file (20120017679.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It was his understanding at the time that if he had enough years of service upon reaching ETS, he would automatically be placed in the Retired Reserve. The available evidence does not support correction of the applicant's record to show he was transferred to the Retired Reserve instead of being discharged. The evidence of record does not show that he did so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010360

    Original file (20130010360.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Between January and March 2011, there was a Military Personnel (MILPER) Message, Subject: Change to Retention Control Point (RCP) for Enlisted Soldiers Serving in the Regular Army (RA) or Under Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Title 10 Programs, briefed to all career counselors that all RCP dates were going to be effective 1 June 2011 (his ETS date was 19 June 2011). ; (3) first his unit received orders which showed he was "Authorized full separation pay" and after that the DCSS issue came up;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004107141C070208

    Original file (2004107141C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant was assigned a separation code of JBK and an RE code of RE-3A at the time of separation because she was not eligible to reenlist without a waiver due to the Declination of Continued Service Statement that she signed. A code of RE-1A is not appropriate in the applicant's case, because she was not separated for reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011310

    Original file (20080011310.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    It states, in pertinent part, that in the case of a person who is entitled to retired pay under section 12731 of this title, the retired pay base is the monthly basic pay, determined at the rates applicable on the date when retired pay is granted, of the highest grade held satisfactorily by the person at any time in the Armed Forces. In view of the facts of this case, the applicant’s retirement orders should be corrected to show he was placed on the retired list in the retired grade of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017053

    Original file (20070017053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence shows that the applicant reenlisted for six years on 5 April 1983. The evidence of record shows the applicant was not issued a DD Form 214 when he reenlisted on 5 April 1983 in accordance with the applicable regulation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by issuing the applicant a certificate of service for the period 19 September 1978 through 4 April 1983 to show that he served honorably and was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001061234C070421

    Original file (2001061234C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Under the qualitative screening subprogram, records for grades E-5 through E-9 are regularly screened by the Department of the Army promotion selection boards. Soldiers whose continued service is not warranted receive a QMP bar to reenlistment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.