Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000174
Original file (20080000174.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

	IN THE CASE OF:	  

	BOARD DATE:	  8 May 2008

	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20080000174 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that he be paid incapacitation pay for the period        25 November 2003 through 31 May 2004.

2.  The applicant states that he was entitled to incapacitation pay due to an accident which he incurred during his annual training during fiscal year 2002.  He did not receive any pay during that time from his civilian job due to his injury.

3.  The applicant provides a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 19 March 2002; one page of a letter from his doctor, dated 4 October 2002; a letter, dated 9 November 2004, from the National Guard Bureau (NGB); a letter from his doctor, dated 24 November 2004; a memorandum, dated 2 February 2005, from the Puerto Rico National Guard Element, Joint Forces Headquarters, Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel; a memorandum, dated 3 March 2006, from the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, National Guard Joint Forces Headquarters; seven DA Forms 7574 (Incapacitation Pay Monthly Claim Form) for the period 25 November 2003 through 31 May 2004; seven DA Forms 7574-1 (Military Physician’s Statement of Soldier’s Incapacitation/Fitness for Duty) for the period 1 November 2003 through 31 May 2004; one DA Form 7574-2 (Soldier’s Acknowledgement of Incapacitation Pay Counseling), dated 23 May 2006; and one page of a medical document, titled “ELBOWS, WRISTS, and FOREARMS.”


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard on 28 January 1982.

2.  A DA Form 2173, dated 19 March 2002, shows the applicant was treated for a swelling forearm on 17 March 2002, during annual training.  The unit commander determined that the applicant’s injury was incurred in the line of duty and no formal line of duty investigation was required.  

3.  In a 9 November 2004 memorandum, NGB noted that on 4 February 2003 it agreed with the Puerto Rico Army National Guard’s line of duty finding of NOT IN LINE OF DUTY-NOT DUE TO OWN MISCONDUCT-Existed Prior to Service (EPTS) with No Aggravation.  The applicant appealed the finding, and the memorandum noted that the line of duty determination would be forwarded to the U. S. Army Human Resources Command, who was the final approving authority on his Line of Duty appeal.

4.  A 2 February 2005 memorandum from the Puerto Rico National Guard Element, Joint Forces Headquarters, Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, stated in part, “The enclosed Line of Duty determination of (the applicant/applicant’s social security number) was AMMENDMENT (sic)-APPROVED/IN THE LINE OF DUTY – EPTS – SERVICE AGGRAVATION….”

5.  On 23 May 2006, the applicant submitted seven DA Forms 7574 wherein he and his civilian employer certified that he was unable to work at his civilian job for the period 25 November 2003 through 31 May 2004.  The forms also indicated that he was receiving Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Disability Compensation.

6.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the Personnel Division, NGB.  That office recommended approval of the applicant’s request.  That office also noted that the applicant indicated on his DA Forms 7574 that he received DVA disability compensation during the period of time for which he requests incapacitation pay.  That office stated that Army Regulation 135-381, paragraph 1-13(k) states that Reserve Component Soldiers are not entitled to receive both DVA disability compensation and incapacitation pay for the same disabling condition.  If his DVA disability compensation was paid for the same period and disabling condition before he was authorized incapacitation pay, it will be deducted from his incapacitation payment.



7.  A copy of the advisory opinion was provided to the applicant for comment or rebuttal.  On 3 April 2008, he concurred with the advisory opinion.

8.  Army Regulation 135-381 (Incapacitation of Reserve Component Soldiers) establishes procedures and policies and implements statutory authorities regarding medical, dental, hospitalization, and disability benefits, incapacitation compensation, and death benefits, as well as reporting requirements on these entitlements for Reserve Component Soldiers.

9.  Army Regulation 135-381 states that, in order to qualify for Army disability benefits, Soldiers must have incurred or aggravated an injury, illness, or a disease condition while in a duty or travel status.  Prerequisites for entitlement to incapacitation pay are inability to perform normal military duties or satisfactory demonstration of loss of nonmilitary earned income.  Soldiers are entitled to a portion of the same monthly pay and allowances as is provided members of the Active Army with corresponding grade, length of service, marital status, and number of dependents, for each period the Soldier is unable to perform normal military duties or can demonstrate loss of compensation from nonmilitary income. 

10.  Army Regulation 135-381 states that Reserve Component Soldiers are not entitled to receive both DVA disability compensation and incapacitation pay for the same disabling condition.  If the approving authority permits incapacitation pay for the same period and disabling condition, the Soldier must waive the DVA disability compensation to receive military pay and allowances.  The DVA will reduce or stop the disability payment while the member receives incapacitation pay.  If the DVA disability compensation was paid for the same period and disabling condition before the Soldier was authorized incapacitation pay, it will be deducted from the Soldier’s incapacitation payment.

11.  Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1241.2 (Reserve Component Incapacitation System Management), paragraph 4.3. states it is Department of Defense policy to authorize pay and allowances, to the extent permitted by law, for Reserve Component members who are not medically qualified to perform military duties, as determined by the Secretary concerned, because of an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty or to provide pay and allowances to Reserve Component members who are fit to perform military duties but experience a loss of earned income because of an injury, illness, or disease incurred or aggravated in the line of duty.





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s DA Form 2173 indicated his commander determined that the applicant’s injury was incurred in the line of duty.  In the 2 November 2004 NGB memorandum, NGB noted that on 4 February 2003 NGB agreed with the Puerto Rico Army National Guard’s line of duty finding of NOT IN LINE OF DUTY-NOT DUE TO OWN MISCONDUCT-EPTS with No Aggravation.  

2.  However, the Puerto Rico National Guard Element, Joint Forces Headquarters, Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel memorandum, dated              2 February 2005, indicated that the Line of Duty determination was amended     to read “APPROVED/IN THE LINE OF DUTY – EPTS – SERVICE AGGRAVATION….”  Therefore, the applicant would have been eligible for incapacitation pay.  He provided DA Forms 7574 wherein his civilian employer verified that he lost civilian income due to his injury during the period for which he requests incapacitation pay.

3.  The applicant’s records should be corrected to show he was approved to receive incapacitation pay as a result of lost civilian income for the period          25 November 2003 through 31 May 2004.  Any DVA disability compensation he was paid for this period, for the same disabling condition, will be deducted from his incapacitation payment.

BOARD VOTE:

__xxx___  __xxx ___  __xxx ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was approved to receive incapacitation pay as a result of lost civilian income for the period 25 November 2003 through 31 May 2004 and that he be paid all incapacitation pay due as a result of this correction, minus any DVA disability compensation he was paid for this period, for the same disabling condition.




      ________XXX___________
       	CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000174



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20080000174


2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007061

    Original file (20070007061.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The opinion enclosed DA Forms 3349s dated 11 June 2006 and 11 December 2006, showing the applicant was on a physical profile during these periods and was unable to perform his military duties and responsibilities. The advisory opinion also stated that Army Regulation 135-381, paragraph 1-8 provides that a member who is unable to perform military duties because of incapacitation is entitled to full pay and allowances, including all incentive pay to which entitled, less any civilian earned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005128

    Original file (20080005128.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DFAS confirmed that the applicant is entitled to INCAP pay, reduced by the amount of earned income she received in her Federal civilian job for the period 9 February through 28 March 2006. Therefore, the applicant’s records should be corrected to show she applied for INCAP pay for the period 9 February through 28 March 2006; that her request was approved in a timely manner; and that she be paid INCAP pay for that period, reduced, if appropriate, by the amount she still owes as a result of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020102

    Original file (20080020102.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides, in support of his application, the following documents: a. Chronological time line of events from 19 April 2004 through 30 May 2006; b. active duty orders and a memorandum; c. DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty), ending on 20 April 1978, and a DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) ending on 15 May 2004; d. DD Form 261 (Report of Investigation LOD and Misconduct Status) with enclosures, dated 18 May 2006, for carpal tunnel...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007219C071029

    Original file (20060007219C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 1241.2 (Reserve Component Incapacitation System Management), dated 3 May 2001, paragraph 6.3.2. states incapacitation pay in any particular case may not be made for more than 6 months without review of the case by the Secretary concerned to ensure that continuation of military pay and allowances is warranted under this Instruction, and to determine whether the member should be referred to the Disability Evaluation System. DODI 1241.2, paragraph...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561C080213

    Original file (20070011561C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 October 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070011561 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. In a memorandum dated 1 April 2004, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months. The memorandum noted the line of duty finding had been approved on 9 October 2003 and the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561

    Original file (20070011561.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum dated 1 April 2004, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months. The memorandum noted the line of duty finding had been approved on 9 October 2003 and the applicant had been paid incapacitation pay from 22 September 2003 through February 2004. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing the request to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011561

    Original file (20070011561.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In a memorandum dated 9 September 2005, the applicant’s unit requested the applicant be paid incapacitation pay beyond six months and restated the facts noted in its 1 April 2004 memorandum on the same matter. Members authorized incapacitation pay are not allowed to attend IDT or to acquire retirement points for drills. As a result, the Board recommends that the State Army National Guard records and all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007342

    Original file (20100007342.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he is entitled to receive incapacitation pay for the period from February 2007 to April 2008. Upon review of the medical records provided during the period 1 February 2007 through 30 April 2008, the required medical documents were not present. The applicant contends, in effect, that his military records should be corrected to show he is entitled to receive an extension of his incapacitation pay for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022642

    Original file (20100022642.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. although his medical condition was determined to be in the line of duty (LOD), he did not receive INCAP pay for the period he was not allowed to perform IDTs, nor was he processed by a medical or physical evaluation board (MEB/PEB); b. he received pay for his active duty service performed from 20 January through 5 June 1998 and INCAP pay for the months August through October 1998; and c. he was discharged from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) on 2...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050007590

    Original file (20050007590.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Counsel requests that the applicant's records be corrected to show that (1) he did not fraudulently request and obtain unauthorized military pay and benefits; (2) he did not improperly receive medical care at government expense; (3) he did not fail to provide evidence that his injury was aggravated while in a duty status; (4) he did not erroneously receive incapacitation pay; (5) the Army National Guard (ARNG) properly reimbursed him and his private insurer for out-of-pocket medical expenses...