Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017923
Original file (20070017923.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  1 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070017923 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Michael J. Fowler

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Lester Echols

Chairperson

Mr. Joe R. Schroeder

Member

Mr. Larry W. Racster

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his rank be changed from Specialist Five 
(SP5)/E-5 to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6.  He also requests two awards of the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that his Platoon Sergeant recommended him for promotion and that his Platoon Leader denied his promotion.  He further states that his Platoon Sergeant also recommended him for the Bronze Star Medal and he believes that he should have received a second Bronze Star Medal upon the end of his tour in Vietnam. 

3.  The applicant provides U.S. Army Military Personnel Center Letter Orders Number D5-5, dated 5 May 1975; a U.S. Army Certificate of Retirement, dated 
1 February 1975; an undated Freedom Team Certificate of Appreciation; and a 
4 page Department of Veterans Affairs Disability Rating, dated 22 July 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant requested correction of his records to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal.  There are no orders or other evidence authorizing award of this decoration to the applicant.  In the absence of a proper award authority for this decoration, the applicant may request award of two Bronze Star Medals under the provisions of Section 1130, Title 10, United States Code.  He has been notified by separate correspondence of the procedures for applying for the decoration under section 1130 and, as a result, it will not be discussed further in this Record of Proceedings.



3.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 1967 and successfully completed basic training and advanced individual training.  He was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 76Q (Special Purpose Equipment Repair Specialist).  He was promoted to Specialist Five (SP5)/E-5 on 29 March 1968.

4.   The applicant was placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List on 
30 January 1970.  He was permanently retired on 1 February 1975 due to a physical disability.

5.  The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 30 January 1970 shows the entry of "SP5" in item 5a (Grade, Rate or Rank) and the entry of "E-5" in item 5b (Pay Grade).

6.  There are no special orders in the applicant's service personnel records promoting him to SSG/E-6 while he was on active duty.

7.  Army Regulation 600-200, chapter, in effect at the time, prescribed the promotion policy to pay grades E-4 through E-9 and the selection board process. It stated that a waiver of the requirement to appear before a selection board would not be granted.  The board would consist of both officers and enlisted appointed by the appropriate promotion authority to select individuals for promotion to pay grades E-5 through E-9.  A list of the individuals recommended by the board and selected by the promotion authority, in the order they were to be promoted, would be published.  

8.  Army Regulation 600-200, chapter 7, in effect at the time, also covered promotion of personnel hospitalized as a result of hostile action.  It stated all individuals with an order of merit recommended list status for promotion to pay grades E-5, E-6, and E-7 at time of evacuation, who were transferred to a medical facility prior to promotion, would be promoted by the medical facility commander.  Correspondence reflecting the individual's order of merit recommended list status would be forwarded to the medical facility commander with the individual's personnel record by the losing commander.  Medical facility commanders with promoting authority could promote individuals assigned as patients who had an established order of merit recommended list status.  Promotion could not be made earlier than the date the individual completed, without waiver, the normal time in grade and service requirements. 





DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that he was recommended for promotion to SSG by his Platoon Sergeant.  However, there is no evidence in his military records that shows he was promoted to SSG and he has not provided evidence that shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG.  

2.  More importantly, there is no evidence in the applicant's records that shows he appeared before a promotion board prior to being retired.  In addition, the applicant does not mention that he appeared before a promotion board.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 with the ending period 30 January 1970, which shows he was promoted on 29 March 1968 to the rank of SP5/E-5, is correct.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__LE   __  ___JRS__  ___LWR_  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




___Lester Echols_             _
          CHAIRPERSON







Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005182

    Original file (20080005182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 40 (Wounds) is blank, and Item 41 (Decorations and Awards) does not include the SS or PH. However, there is no evidence indicating that he was ever recommended for or awarded the SS by proper authority while serving on active duty, and he has failed to provide sufficient compelling evidence of an act of gallantry that would support award the SS at this late date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013859

    Original file (20090013859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show two awards of the Bronze Star Medal, three awards of the Purple Heart, and the Silver Star. Item 9 (Awards, Decorations, and Campaigns) of the FSM's DA Form 2-1 does not list awards of the Purple Heart or the Bronze Star Medal. In this case, there are no general orders that show the FSM was awarded the Purple Heart; there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001749

    Original file (20110001749.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. General orders awarded him the Bronze Star Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000960

    Original file (20150000960.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Specifically, the applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show in: * block 23a (Specialty Number and Title), his military occupational specialty (MOS) as "Field Illumination Crew Chief" * block 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized), he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal * block 25 (Education and Training Completed), he graduated from the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016567

    Original file (20130016567.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) records to show: * His active Reserve service * Promotion to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * Change in his military occupational specialty (MOS) 2. His record contains a Promotion Recommendation and Board Report Form dated 8 August 1977 which listed his current rank as SP5 and shows he was recommended for promotion to SSG. The evidence of record shows he held no military status from 26 March 1971 to 3 October 1972 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009041

    Original file (20090009041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of two additional Purple Hearts, Combat Infantryman Badge, Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device; his rank/grade as sergeant (SGT)/E-5; a second tour in Vietnam; and his date of separation as 11 February 1970. Without the applicant's service medical records, there is insufficient evidence to show that he was treated for any combat wounds except those incurred on 17...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20120000464

    Original file (20120000464.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he held the rank/pay grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 at the time of his release from active duty (REFRAD) and to show award of: * the Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) * the Purple Heart * the Army Good Conduct Medal * the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * the Vietnam Service Medal with 3 bronze service stars * any additional awards...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008481

    Original file (20120008481.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 23a (Specialty Number & Title) of his DD Form 214 shows his MOS as 71B and that it was assigned on 23 August “1971.” His DD Form 214 does not show the following awards: * Soldier's Medal * Bronze Star Medal * Air Medal * Army Commendation Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge 10. 19. Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006308

    Original file (20140006308.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 December 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140006308 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Recently, the Department of the Army assisted him in obtaining 8 awards, including the Silver Star, earned in Vietnam. A centralized promotion system has been in effect for promotion of enlisted Soldiers since 1 January 1969 for SGM, 1 March 1969 for MSG, and 1 June 1970 for SFC.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 04101079C070208

    Original file (04101079C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant is not entitled to an award of the Bronze Star Medal based on his award of the Purple Heart. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that he qualified as a sharpshooter with the M-14 rifle and as a marksman with the M-16 automatic rifle and was awarded the associated badge and component bars; b. showing that he is entitled to a bronze service star on his Vietnam Service Medal and the...