Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017259
Original file (20070017259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  22 April 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070017259 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


 

Director

 

Analyst
      The following members, a quorum, were present:


M

Chairperson

M

Member

M

Member
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).



THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) effective 18 August 1967 to show that he entered active duty on 19 August 1964 and served for three full years.

2.  The applicant states that omission of his service from 19 August 1964 to 
13 September 1965 adversely affects his retired pay.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, effective 18 August 1967; DD Form 47 (Record of Induction); SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination); 
SF 89 (Medical History).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  At the time of his application, the applicant was a staff sergeant, pay grade 
E-6 in the Retired Reserve.  

3.  The applicant's Record of Induction was initiated on 19 August 1964.  It shows that he received a pre-induction medical examination on 26 August 1964 and was found to be medically qualified for military service.  Item 24a of this same form indicates that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 
13 September 1965.

4.  The applicant completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 45G (Turret Artillery Repairman).  

5.  On 11 April 1966, the applicant was assigned for duty as a turret mechanic with the 3rd Battalion, 76th Artillery Regiment, in the Federal Republic of Germany.  He returned to the United States on or about 12 August 1967.

6.   On 18 August 1967, the applicant was released from active duty and transferred to the United States Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Annual Training).  He had attained the rank of specialist four, pay grade E-4, and had completed 1 year, 11 months, and 6 days of creditable active duty.

7.  Records show that the applicant remained in the USAR Control Group Annual Training through 12 September 1971.  

8.  On 1 May 1977, the applicant enlisted in the Army National Guard and served through a series of enlistments until his transfer to the Retired Reserve on 
12 October 1995.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), as in effect at the time, prescribed the separation documents that would be furnished each individual when separated from the Army and established standardized procedures for the preparation and distribution of those documents.  It provided, in pertinent part, that Item 22a (1) (Net Service This Period) of the DD Form 214 would show the total  service completed between the dates shown in Items 10c or 17c and Item 11d of the DD Form 214.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 13 September 1965 and was released from active duty on 18 August 1967, completing 1 year, 11 months, and 6 days of creditable active duty.  The applicant's DD Form 214 accurately reflects this period of active duty service. 

2.  The applicant's contention that he should received active duty credit from the date shown on his Record of Induction of 19 August 1964 to the day prior to his actual induction on 13 September 1965 is not substantiated by any evidence of record.  Furthermore, the applicant has not provided any supporting evidence or convincing argument. 

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.
4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_ x __  __x  ___x  _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.





      _______x_______
                CHAIRPERSON


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20070017259



4


DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR
ARLINGTON, VA  22202-4508




Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027806

    Original file (20100027806.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 12 May 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100027806 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's military service records do not contain a DA Form 348-1-R (Equipment Operator's Qualification Record). c. The eligibility requirements for mechanics requires that a Soldier must: (1) pass aptitude tests and complete the standard mechanic's course with a "skilled" rating or have demonstrated possession of sufficient previous experience as an automotive or engineer equipment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009465

    Original file (20080009465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his military records be corrected to show that his primary military occupational specialty (MOS) at the time of his release from active duty was 427.10 (Aircraft Armament Repairman). The applicant essentially states that once he returned from Vietnam, he was sent to Fort Hood, Texas with an MOS of 45G (Turret Artillery Repairman), but that this was not his primary MOS. The evidence of record also clearly shows that he served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003742

    Original file (20110003742.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) - he served in Korea from 19 January 1964 to 17 February 1965, a period of 1 year and 1 month; and b. Therefore, he is entitled to the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 12 March 1963 through 18 February 1965 and he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010712

    Original file (20100010712.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This publication shows that the 6th Battalion, 27th Artillery Regiment, during the time of the applicant's assignment, was cited for the Meritorious Unit Commendation during the period January – October 1966 by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 17, dated in 1968. d. DAGO Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for service in Vietnam to Headquarters, United States Army Vietnam and its subordinate units during...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001598

    Original file (20090001598.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records are not available to the Board for review. Therefore, in the absence of orders awarding the applicant MOS 11B as his PMOS or some other substantiating evidence, there is insufficient evidence to support correction of the applicant’s separation orders and final DD Form 214, particularly in view of the evidence below. While the evidence of record indicates that the applicant was assigned to an infantry unit and he may have performed the duties of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008672

    Original file (20140008672.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). (2) Table 2-2 (AFEM - Designated U.S. Military Operations) shows the AFEM was authorized for service in Korea from 1 October 1966 to 30 June 1974. d. The Korea Defense Service Medal (KDSM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served on active duty in support of the defense of the ROK. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016294

    Original file (20110016294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following: a. Special Orders Number 73, Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station (2536-15), Boise, Idaho, dated 26 October 1965, shows the applicant was inducted in the Army of the United States for an active duty commitment of 24 months unless sooner discharged or extended by proper authority and assigned for processing and further assignment. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013644

    Original file (20080013644.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that his military service records show his active duty service, but his discharge document does not show all of his active service. This document also shows the VA determined the applicant’s period of service in the USAR was from 26 August 1963 through 25 February 1964, for 6 months and 10 days of active duty for training purposes only. The instructions for block a, line 3, state “self explanatory.” b. Paragraph 52 (Item 24, block b) state to enter the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068775C070402

    Original file (2002068775C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Report of Medical Examination, SF 88, and a Report of Medical History, SF 89, from his induction physical on 24 July 1964; The applicant completed a separation physical on 18 July 1966. There is no evidence to show the applicant was ever diagnosed with a mental disorder that would have rendered him unfit due to a physical disability.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010258

    Original file (20090010258.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 6 November 1972, which corrected his DD Form 214, dated 9 November 1970, to show award of the Air Medal with the Numeral 6. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System) provides, in pertinent part, that a Soldier who can perform duties required of any 3-character MOS may be awarded that MOS. Although the applicant served in...