RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 18 March 2008
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070016206
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance | |Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Mr. Richard T. Dunbar | |Chairperson |
| |Mr. Gerald J. Purcell | |Member |
| |Ms. Rea M. Nuppenau | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his 20 November 1962 separation
document (DD form 214) be corrected to reflect his temporary duty (TDY) in
Laos.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 does not reflect
his TDY service in Laos, which was a classified mission in 1961. He claims
that since the mission and his presence was classified, it was not entered
in his record.
3. The applicant provides a self-authored statement, Operation White Star
Roster and Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) orders in support of his
application.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an
applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations
if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided
in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is
granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are
insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular
Army and entered active duty on 25 February 1955. He was initially trained
in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 112.77 (Heavy Weapons
Infantryman).
3. The applicant's Personnel Qualification Record (DA Form 2-1) shows, in
Item 5 (Overseas Service) that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN)
on TDY for six months from 26 April through 18 October 1961. Item 35
(Record of Assignments) shows that during this period, he was assigned to
77th Special Forces Group (SFG), Fort Bragg, North Carolina, performing
duties in MOS 911.63 (Medical Aidman).
4. On 20 November 1962, the applicant was honorably discharged for the
purpose of immediate reenlistment. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the
time shows, in Item 24c (Foreign Service), that he completed a total of 2
years,
4 months, and 29 days of overseas service during the period covered by the
separation document (21 November 1959-20 November 1962).
5. On 31 August 1978, the applicant was honorably retired, in the rank of
master sergeant, after completing a total of 23 years, 6 months, and 7 days
of active military service. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time
showed he completed a total of 3 years, 11 months, and 16 days of overseas
service in Item 18f (Foreign and/or Sea Service), and Item 19 (Indochina or
Korea Service Since August 5, 1964) contained entries confirming his RVN
service from 5 November 1969 through 10 May 1971 and from 10 March 1972
through 9 March 1973.
6. The applicant provides a "Hotfoot/White Star Roster" that identifies
the names, including the applicant's, of personnel participating in the
operation.
7. The Special Operations Command historical website shows that Operation
White Star was a clandestine operation conducted in Laos between 1959 and
1962, under the auspices of the CIA, but thru the Ambassador to Laos to
"assist" Laos in fighting the communists.
8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation
documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge,
release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It also
establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form
214. The instructions for Item 24 contains in the version of the
regulation in effect at the time the applicant's 20 November 1962 DD Form
214 was issued stated to enter the total active duty outside continental
limits of the United States for the period covered by the DD Form 214 in
Item 24c. There were no regulatory provisions that provided for entering
locations of overseas TDY service on the DD Form 214 at that time or at the
time of his retirement in 1978.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his service in Laos should be entered
on his DD Form 214 was carefully considered. However, there were not
regulatory provisions that provided for a separate entry identifying
overseas TDY service on the DD Form 214 at the time the applicant was
issued his 1962 DD Form 214 or at the time of his retirement in 1978. As a
result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the
requested relief. The applicant and all others concerned should know that
this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in
service to our Nation. The applicant and all Americans should be
justifiably proud of his service in arms.
2. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust. The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.
3. Although there are no regulatory provisions that provide for entering
the applicant's service in Laos on the DD Form 214, the "White Star" roster
provided by the applicant will be filed in his Official Military Personnel
File (OMPF) in order to provide clarity on where his service was performed
during this period.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
__RTD __ __GJP __ __RMN _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.
_____Richard T. Dunbar____
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070016206 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |2008/03/DD |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE |HD |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE |1978/08/31 |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY |AR 635-200 C12 |
|DISCHARGE REASON |Retirement |
|BOARD DECISION |DENY |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. 1021 |100.0000 |
|2. | |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | AR20080018471
The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected to reflect awards and decorations associated with his military service. The evidence available to the Board indicates the applicant served in Laos in a temporary duty status between September 1961 and February 1962. However, based on the applicants service in Laos he is entitled to the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002526
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show any awards due him including the Purple Heart and Combat Infantryman Badge. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 28 (Qualification in Arms): * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-1) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Carbine Bar effective 22 December 1961 * item 38 (Record of Assignments) he was...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015790
His military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB or Purple Heart. In the absence of such evidence, there is an insufficient basis for award of the Purple Heart in this case. There is no evidence in the available records to show the applicant should be awarded the CIB.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017981
His military record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years and entered active on 21 May 1956. Based on his overall record of service for that period, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM and to correct his DD Form 214 for the period ending 14 June 1965 to show this award. Therefore, he is entitled to show award of the AFEM and correction of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 13 May 1959 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017359
The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of his disabled father, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), Philippine Defense Medal, Philippine Independence Medal, Combat Infantryman Badge (2nd Award), and all awards he is entitled to based on service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant also states that based on the FSM's RVN service, he believes he should have been awarded the Vietnam Service Medal,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014054
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Item 24c of the DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows he completed 1 year, 3 months, and 27 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (20 December 1955 - 19 December 1958). Item 24c of the DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 16 days of overseas service during the period covered by the DD Form 214 (20 December 1958 - 30...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000703
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), for the period ending 20 October 1959 to show the Airborne Course * his DD Form 214 for the period ending 2 February 1965, to show in: * item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the: * Army Good Conduct Medal * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Overseas Service Ribbon * United...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020211
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Eighth United States Army (EUSA), Korea from 6 April 1960 through 23 April 1961 in item 29 (Foreign Service). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24c of his 6 November 1962 DD Form 214 by deleting the current entry and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071947C070403
He also states that although his service records show his assignment as Supply Officer with Military Assistance Advisory Group (MAAG) Laos, his actual duty assignment was with a Special Forces “C” Detachment called the “White Star Mobile Training Team.” In support of his application, he submits a letter of explanation, dated 2 February 2002; his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); orders and citation for the Army Commendation Medal, dated 22 January 1963; orders for the Combat...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001935
The applicant requests, in effect, that he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and that it be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). Section 5 (Service Outside Continental United States) of the applicant's DA Form 24 shows that during the period he was ordered to active duty he had no overseas service. The evidence shows the applicant served on active duty for the period from 23 April 1959 through 12 April 1961 and for the...