Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015603
Original file (20070015603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  20 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070015603 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


x
	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending 25 June 1978 to show he entered active duty on 2 September 1977.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the date he entered active duty should be 2 September 1977 instead of 31 March 1978.  

3.  The applicant provides a copy of a memorandum awarding him the Armed Forces Reserve Medal; his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 June 1978; and his Chronological Statement of Retirement Points.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 2 September 1977.  He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 31 March 1978 and was released from ADT on 25 June 1978.  On the following date, he was transferred back to his Reserve unit.  

3.  His DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 June 1978 shows he entered active duty on 31 March 1978.  He completed 2 months and 25 days of active service and 6 months and 29 days of inactive duty service.  

4.  A memorandum, dated 25 September 1989, from Headquarters, 1st Special Forces Battalion (Airborne), Newburgh, New York, show the applicant was awarded the Armed Forces Reserve Medal for the period 1 September 1977 to 31 August 1987.

5.  The applicant’s Chronological Statement of Retirement Points shows his retirement year beginning date as 2 September 1977.  
6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) governs the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It states that the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement or discharge.  In the version in effect at the time, it directed that the date entered active duty would be entered in item 15 (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) of the DD Form 214.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s Chronological Statement of Retirement Points shows his retirement year beginning date as 2 September 1977, which is the date he enlisted in the USAR.

2.  The DD Form 214 is meant to reflect the date of entry on active duty for the current period.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 properly reflects his date of entry on active duty as 31 March 1978.  Therefore, there is no basis for correcting his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 June 1978 to show he entered active duty on 2 September 1977.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

x_____ x_____ x_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




x_________
          CHAIRPERSON


INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070015603
SUFFIX

RECON
YYYYMMDD
DATE BOARDED
YYYYMMDD
TYPE OF DISCHARGE
(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)
DATE OF DISCHARGE
YYYYMMDD
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY
AR . . . . .  
DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(NC, GRANT , DENY, GRANT PLUS)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018105

    Original file (20080018105.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 June 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018105 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his request for correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 30 June 1980, to show he entered on active duty for training (ADT) on 1 November 1977 instead of 1 October 1978. Orders Number T-12-42207, dated 21 December 1979, changed his period of ADT from 458 days to 639 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080000154

    Original file (20080000154.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with the period ending 30 June 1980 to show he entered active duty for training (ADT) on 1 November 1977 instead of 1 October 1978. Item 35 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), prepared on 22 April 1981 and reviewed by the applicant on 18 October 1981, shows that he was on ADT assigned to the USARE, USASC, Hawaii for the period 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018286

    Original file (20110018286.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The ARCOTR may be awarded retroactively to those personnel who successfully completed AT or ADT on foreign soil in a Reserve status prior to 11 July 1984 provided they had an active status on or after 11 July 1984. c. the AFRM require that a minimum of 50 retirement points be earned for each of the 10 qualifying years and that the qualifying service be completed within 12 consecutive years. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in Korea during a qualifying period of service for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015060

    Original file (20100015060.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he was retired instead of medically discharged with entitlement to severance pay. With respect to his years of active service, the available evidence of record shows the applicant completed 15 years, 11 months, and 25 days of total active service and 17 years, 1 month, and 12 days of qualifying service toward non-regular retirement. With respect to the total active and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015030

    Original file (20070015030.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 25 June 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. His discharge packet is not available; however, in the absence of evidence to the contrary it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015030

    Original file (20070015030.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Effective 20 June 1978, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Army National Guard and ordered to involuntary active duty for 21 months and 6 days for failure to satisfactorily participate in required unit training. On 25 June 1979, the applicant was discharged, in pay grade E-1, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100025724

    Original file (20100025724.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. On 29 March 1978, RCPAC issued an AGUZ Form 115 documenting the applicant's retirement points for the period 6 January 1977 through 5 January 1978 and it shows he served on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001959

    Original file (20070001959.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows that this correction resulted in the applicant being credited with 2 additional days of active service based on his active duty training service during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. Thus, the applicant provides evidence to substantiate his claim that his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 December 1991, does not reflect credit for the 2 days of active duty training during the period 23 – 24 April 1977. However, the applicant’s DD Form 214, with an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001743

    Original file (20110001743.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his correct date of entry as 6 May 1975 instead of 30 October 1978. The regulation states not to issue a DD Form 214 to replace record copies or DD Forms 214 lost by Soldiers. He completed 16 years, 7 months, and 1 day of creditable active service during the period covered by this DD Form 214: * item 12a of his DD Form 214 correctly reflects the entry "1978 10 30," the date...

  • CG | BCMR | Retirement Cases | 2005-131

    Original file (2005-131.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated April 26, 2006, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, now serving as a xxxxxxxxxxxxxx in the Marine Corps Reserve, alleged that while he was serving in the Coast Guard Reserve, a drill point that he earned during his anniversary year ending February 27, 1980, was erroneously recorded as having been earned during the prior anniversary year, which ended on February 27, 1979. However, his commanding officer noted on...