Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070014958
Original file (20070014958.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  04 March 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070014958 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Ms. Jeanne Marie Rowan

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. James E. Anderholm

Chairperson

Mr. William D. Powers

Member

Mr. Jerome L. Pionk

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation effective date of 31 January 1984 be corrected to show award of the Special Forces Tab. 

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that a request for award of the Special Forces Tab was submitted prior to his retirement and subsequently it was approved. 

3.  The applicant provides a copy of Permanent Orders 41-10, dated 5 March 1984, published by the U. S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center, Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 October 1957.  He completed basic combat training and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 951.10 (Military Policemen).  Records show he also was awarded MOS 71L (Administrative Specialist), 75Z (Personnel Sergeant), and 11B (Infantryman).  Records show he served continuously on active duty until his retirement on 31 January 1984.

3.  Item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows that he completed Special Forces military training in 1967. 

4.  Item 5 (Oversea Service) of the applicant's DA Form 2-1 shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 14 November 1967 to 11 June 1969.  Item 35 (Record of Assignments) shows that he was assigned to Detachment B-22, Company B, 5th Special Forces Group, RVN and that his principle duty was Administrative Supervisor.  This same form shows that his MOS was 71L4S with the "S" additional skill identifier indicating he was Special Forces qualified. 

5.  On 31 January 1984, he was separated from the Regular Army and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve Control Group (Retired).  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he completed 26 years, 3 months, and 3 days of active federal service.  

6.  Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 does not show award of the Special Forces Tab.  

7.  Permanent Orders 41-10, dated 5 March 1984, published by the U. S. Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center headquartered at Fort Bragg awarded the applicant the Special Forces Tab.  The authority cited on this permanent order is Department of the Army Message (Date Time Group) 141578Z June 1983 and Message 061300Z October 1983.  The reason noted on the permanent order was he was awarded skill qualification identifier "S." 

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes Army policy and procedures concerning awards.  Paragraph 8-49 provides for award of the Special Forces (SF) Tab.  That paragraph states that the SF Tab may be awared retroactively to all personnel who performed wartime service from 1942 to 1973 who served with a Special Forces unit during wartime and were either unable to or not required to attend a formal program of instruction but were awarded the skill qualification identifier "S," "3," or "5G" by competent authority. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Based on the evidence of record, the applicant's official military personnel record, and his assignment to a Special Forces unit in the Republic of Vietnam from 1967 to 1969, the applicant is entitled to award of the Special Forces Tab.

2.  Based on the foregoing information, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be amended to show his was awarded the Special Forces Tab. 







BOARD VOTE:

__JEA__  __WDP__  __JLP ___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending the DD Form 214 to show the additional entry in Block 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the Special Forces Tab. 




___James E. Anderholm _
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20080304
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040008120C070208

    Original file (20040008120C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in three separate applications, that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 November 1979 be corrected: 1) in item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty) to add 31542 Special Forces Qualified Infantry Officer, 3 years, 8 months and to change the entry for 35A to read 7 years and 5 months; 2) in item 2 (Department, Component and Branch) to change Military Police (MP) to Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018872

    Original file (20120018872.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 27 May 1986, to show he was awarded or authorized the Special Forces Tab and the Presidential Unit Citation. The evidence of record shows the Studies and Observation Group, U.S. Military Assistance Command, Vietnam, was awarded the Presidential Unit Citation for the period 24 January 1964 through 30 April 1972. The evidence of record further shows the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015463

    Original file (20090015463.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Special Forces (SF) Tab, Vietnam Service Medal, and other related campaign awards if appropriate. The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending 10 June 1968 does not show the SF Tab, Vietnam Service Medal, or any other Vietnam service-related awards. There is no evidence of record which shows the applicant served in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016443

    Original file (20140016443.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he received the Special Forces (SF) Tab and the Special Operations Divers Badge (formerly known as the Scuba Diver Qualification Badge). In order to be awarded the SF Tab, the Soldier must complete either the SF Qualification Course, or the SF Detachment Officer Qualification Course...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022087

    Original file (20110022087.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. The basic eligibility criteria for the SF Tab in Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in effect during his deployment, stated subsequent to 1955 Reserve Component (RC) personnel must have successfully served for 120 consecutive days, or more, as a company grade officer or enlisted member of an SF Operational Detachment (A-Team), Mobile Strike Force, SF Reconnaissance Team or SF Special Project Unit and must have been awarded the CIB or Combat Medical Badge (CMB). g. After he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002068045C070402

    Original file (2002068045C070402.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his request for branch transfer into the Special Forces Branch (SFB) in specialty 18A be approved. In addition to completion of the qualification course, this regulation indicates that the ASI 5G and the SF Tab must be awarded by competent authority, which was the case for him. The Board notes the applicant’s contention his request for branch transfer into the SFB should be approved based on his being qualified, as evidenced by his being awarded the SF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040005407C070208

    Original file (20040005407C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 21 July 1997, the Chief, Military Awards Branch, United States Total Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM), approved a change to the SF Tab removal criteria contained in Army Regulation 600-8-22 that was recommended by the CG, USAJFKSWC. He further stated that the authority of the CG, USAJFKSWC to revoke the SF Tab is well known throughout the SF community. Further, HRC Awards Branch officials approved the changes to the SF Tab removal criteria in 1997, more than five years before action was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019799

    Original file (20080019799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His command submitted, as the basis for the SF Tab revocation, the general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) and the allegation that he was arrested for driving while under the influence of alcohol after a car accident. The applicant submitted as evidence medical documents which indicate he received psychiatric treatment between May and August 2008 for symptoms associated with PTSD. The applicant also states that an Army Regulation 15-6 investigation was conducted; however, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085925C070212

    Original file (2003085925C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. While the applicant contends that he was not processed for separation and that his misconduct was simply a fabrication by his chain of command used to get his tab revoked, the Board finds that his tab was revoked by the appropriate authority in accordance with the applicable regulation. Accordingly, the Board finds that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004248

    Original file (20090004248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 that the applicant was furnished at the time of his REFRAD shows his MOS as 12B3S, which indicates his Special Forces qualification. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that any person meeting one of the criteria below may be awarded the Special Forces Tab: (1) Successful completion of the United States Army John F. Kennedy Special Warfare Center and School (USAJFKSWCS) approved Active Army (AA) institutional training leading to Special Forces...