Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011752C080407
Original file (20070011752C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:        31 January 2008
      DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070011752


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano          |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Joseph A. Adriance            |     |Analyst              |

      The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. John Infante                  |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Eric N. Andersen              |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. David K. Hassenritter         |     |Member               |

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, payment of accrued leave due at
discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he should have been paid for accrued
leave at the time of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documentary evidence in support of
his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the
Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an
applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations
if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided
in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a
substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is
granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the
applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are
insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army and
entered active duty on 7 June 1978.

3.  On 7 February 1980, a special court-martial (SPCM) convicted the
applicant of two specifications of violating Article 128 of the Uniform
Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) by striking a male military police officer
and striking a female military police officer, who were in the execution of
their duties.  The resultant punishment included confinement at hard labor
for six months and a bad conduct discharge (BCD).

4.  On 23 December 1980, the applicant was separated with a BCD.  The
separation document (DD Form 214) he was issued at the time shows he
accrued 145 days of time lost due to confinement between 7 February and
1 July 1980, and 175 days of time lost due to excess leave between 2 July
and 23 December 1980.

5.  The applicant's record is void of any pay records or vouchers
indicating the amount of leave he had accrued and/or took between 7 June
1978, the date he entered active duty and 7 February 1980, the date he
entered confinement.
6.  Army Regulation 600-8-10 (Leaves and Passes) prescribes the Army's
leave and pass policies.  Paragraph 2-3 contains guidance on leave accrual,
and states, in pertinent part, that Soldiers on active duty earn 30 days of
leave a year with pay and allowances at the rate of 2 1/2 days a month.
This entitlement excludes periods of absent without leave (AWOL);
confinement resulting from a court-martial sentence; confinement for more
than 1 day while awaiting
court-martial provided Soldier is convicted; excess leave; and unauthorized
absence because of detention by civil authorities.

7.  Paragraph 2-5 of the leave and pass regulation contains guidance on
subtracting leave credit.  It states, in pertinent part, that leave is
subtracted for lost time, excess leave, or other non-pay status.  It
further states that 2 1/2 days leave will be subtracted for each full month
of absence and that part-month subtraction will be as follows:  1/2 day
subtracted for 1-6 days of time lost; 1 day subtracted for 7-12 days of
time lost; 1 1/2 days for 13-18 days of time lost;
2 days for 19-24 days of time lost; and 2 1/2 days for 25-31 days of time
lost.

8.  Paragraph 5-19 of the leaves and pass regulation contains guidance on
involuntary excess leave pending punitive discharge.  It states, in
pertinent part, that excess leave may be directed if the Soldier is
sentenced by court-martial to dismissal or a punitive discharge or Soldier
is awaiting completion of appellate review.  Soldiers required to take
leave, who have leave to their credit, may elect one of the following:
receipt of pay and allowances during the period of accrued leave, with
leave beyond that which was accrued charged as excess leave; payment for
leave accrued to the Soldier's credit on the day before the day excess
leave begins with the total period of required leave charged as excess
leave; a combination of receipt of pay and allowances during the period of
accrued leave and accrued leave payment.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is due pay for accrued leave he had
at the time of his discharge was carefully considered.  However, there is
insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant entered confinement on
7 February 1980, and entered an excess leave status on 2 July 1980, which
ended on 23 December 1980, the date of his discharge.  As a result, he
accrued no leave between 7 February and 23 December 1980.

3.  Further, there are no pay records contained in the applicant's record,
and he has failed to provide any pay records or vouchers indicating the
amount of leave he accrued and/or took between 7 June 1978, the date he
entered active duty and 7 February 1980, the date he entered confinement;
or any separation processing documents that reflect any final payments he
may have received.  As a result, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis
to support granting the requested relief in this case at this late date.

4.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must
show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily
appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to
submit evidence that would satisfy this requirement.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___JI ___  __ENA __  __DKH __  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable
error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall
merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the
records of the individual concerned.




                                  ____John Infante________
                                            CHAIRPERSON



                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR20070011752                           |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |2008/01/DD                              |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |BCD                                     |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |1980/12/23                              |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |AR 635-200                              |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |C-M                                     |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.       |128.0000                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


-----------------------
[pic]


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016896

    Original file (20140016896.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 February 1980, the applicant's commander informed him he was initiating separation action under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-31 (Expeditious Discharge Program). The applicant requests to be paid for about 80 days of leave, which he asserts he accrued while on active duty and should have been paid on separation. Regarding the accrued leave for which the applicant could be paid, neither the applicant's record nor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018115

    Original file (20140018115.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his leave balance and repayment of 2.5 leave days charged after retirement. He had a leave balance of 54 days and earned 5 days (from October to November 2013) for a balance of 59 days. The debt is due to leave he took from 1 October 2013 to 30 November 2013 resulting in a negative leave balance of 2.5 days which includes a non-accrual of 0.5 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017971

    Original file (20140017971.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) sent him a statement of debt claiming he owes 3 days of leave, which is not correct as he served all days of his service obligation * he signed out on leave at noon on 3 November 2013 as required of him * his 30 days of PTDY and 87.5 days of accrued leave would have taken him to the last day of February 2014 and his retirement date of 1 March 2014 * his leave dates, date eligible for return from overseas, and final...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060014344C070205

    Original file (20060014344C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, that he be allowed to take his accrued leave, of 58.5 days. The evidence of record shows the applicant had 58.5 days of accrued leave at the time of his ETS, 24 April 1983, and had sold 60 days of leave on 28 April 1980, 3 days after his immediate reenlistment. At the time of his reenlistment, the applicant should have been informed that he was only entitled to receive payment for no more than 60 days of accrued leave during a military career and that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005884C070205

    Original file (20060005884C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that he be granted an additional period of active duty credit for travel time and attendance at an "orientation". On 19 February 1980 the discharge authority approved the release from active duty and directed the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33f(1). The records contains no documentation that the applicant was in an active duty status for any period other than that which is reflected on his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003242

    Original file (20090003242.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s Separation Leave Record, dated 5 January 2009, and prepared by an official at the Fort Bragg, NC, Finance Office shows the following entries: a. the applicant earned a total of 140 days of accrued leave during his 1,700 days of active duty from 12 May 2004 (date he entered active duty) to 5 January 2009 (date he was released from active duty); b. he used 15 days of leave from 1 October 2004 to 15 October 2004 and 30 days of leave from 4 December 2008 to 2 January 2009, for a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050017325C070206

    Original file (20050017325C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    James R. Hastie | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that the entries at item 12 (Record of Service) on his 6 January 1984 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be completed. The applicant states that the DD Form 214 does not reflect his period of active duty from 28 March 1980 through 11 February 1983.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001056845C070420

    Original file (2001056845C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The General Court-Martial Convening Authority (GCMCA) granted excess leave on 30 July 1980. The Board notes that while the applicant's first year of military service was outstanding, as noted in his performance evaluation report, he was subsequently punished on three separate occasions under Article 15 of the UCMJ and was reduced two pay grades, in addition to his conviction by a general court-martial. Although the Board does not generally act on issues which were not part of an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001052233C070420

    Original file (2001052233C070420.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his leave be restored to him for the period 16 February 1993 through 30 September 1998 and that he be allowed special leave accrual. According to military pay and leave records, the applicant took 132 days of leave between 19 December 1997, and his retirement date, 30 September 1998. Exception is required to grant leave accrual in excess of 60 days in the applicant’s case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010385C070208

    Original file (20040010385C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record confirms special leave accrual provisions for all military members have been in effect, in some form, since fiscal year 2001. The evidence of record in this case confirms the applicant was authorized special leave accrual based on his deployments in support of the GWOT. The December 2003 LES he provides shows he was allowed to bring forward 90 days, as opposed to 60 days, of accrued leave at the end of fiscal year 2003, as was authorized by the special leave accrual...