RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 October 2007
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070011435
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.
| |Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano | |Director |
| |Mr. Luis Almodova | |Senior Analyst |
The following members, a quorum, were present:
| |Ms. Ann Campbell | |Chairperson |
| |Ms. LaVerne Douglas | |Member |
| |Mr. Jeffrey Redmann | |Member |
The Board considered the following evidence:
Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.
Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration for chief
warrant officer four under the 2007 year criteria.
2. The applicant states, in effect, that he was not selected for
promotion to chief warrant officer four due to not meeting the education
requirements, the Warrant Advanced Course (WOAC). He also states, in
effect, that he completed the WOAC on 8 January 2007 but, the completion
certificate was not placed in his personnel records until 31 January
2007; therefore, it was not seen by the 2007 promotion selection board.
3. In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of his WOAC
completion certificate and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty).
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Based upon a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of
Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command, St. Louis,
Missouri, it was determined that the applicant’s official military
personnel file (OMPF) contained material error when he was considered and
not selected for promotion to chief warrant officer four by the 2007
Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). His WOAC completion certificate
was not seen.
2. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion
consideration/reconsideration by a special selection board may only be
based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in
the record at the time of consideration.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant’s records contained material error when reviewed for
promotion to chief warrant officer four by the 2007 RCSB and should now be
submitted for appropriate special selection board consideration for this
purpose.
2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be
appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.
BOARD VOTE:
___amc__ ___JR___ ___LD__ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to
warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends
that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be
corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted special
selection board for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer four
under the 2007 year criteria.
2. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was
promoted to chief warrant officer four on his date of eligibility, as
determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the 2007 year
criteria, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other
prerequisites for promotion.
3. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified.
___Ann M. Campbell________
CHAIRPERSON
INDEX
|CASE ID |AR20070011435 |
|SUFFIX | |
|RECON | |
|DATE BOARDED |20071002 |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE | |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY | |
|DISCHARGE REASON | |
|BOARD DECISION |GRANT |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY | |
|ISSUES 1. |131.0000 |
|2. |131.1100 |
|3. | |
|4. | |
|5. | |
|6. | |
-----------------------
[pic]
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000943C070206
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Warrant Officer Advanced Course (WOAC) Certificate; Separation Document (DD Form 214); and United States Army Reserve (USAR) Discharge Orders. The HRC-St. Louis RC promotion official further stated that the applicant did not meet the military education requirement prior to the convening date of the 2002 board, as a result there is no basis for his promotion reconsideration by a Stand-By Advisory Board (STAB) under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000943C070206
The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Warrant Officer Advanced Course (WOAC) Certificate; Separation Document (DD Form 214); and United States Army Reserve (USAR) Discharge Orders. The HRC-St. Louis RC promotion official further stated that the applicant did not meet the military education requirement prior to the convening date of the 2002 board, as a result there is no basis for his promotion reconsideration by a Stand-By Advisory Board (STAB) under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002073057C070403
However, in this case, the applicant could not be selected based on the fact his 2000 record did not reflect completion of the required military education requirements (WOAC) by the convene date of the board. The applicant submitted an Application for Correction of Military Records (DD Form 149) requesting a STAB due to a Code 11, OER missing from his 2001 file. However, pertinent regulations do not specify that an OER Code 11, Promotion Report is required for subsequent promotion...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064415C070421
The regulation also specifies that completion of the WOAC is required for promotion to CW4, no later than the convening date the appropriate selection board. In view of the foregoing, the Board concludes the applicant’s records should be corrected to show she completed the required military education on 20 April 2001, prior to the convening date of the 2001 RCSB and she is entitled to the STAB. The Board further notes that based on the applicant's PED and the 2001 and 2002 RCSB convening...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001057122C070420
Current promotion policy specifies that promotion reconsideration by a special selection board (SSB) may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error, which existed in the records at the time of consideration. The Chief, Promotion and Notifications Branch, Office of Promotions, PERSCOM, expressed the opinion that based on the 6 years time in grade requirement, the applicant was in zone for promotion consideration by the 1991 through 2001 RCSB’s. The Board notes that the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | AR20060016760C071029
The available records indicate that the applicant's completed his education requirement on 18 April 2006. While it is the applicant's responsibility to complete his promotion educational requirement in a timely manner and to ensure that this records are complete at the time of promotion consideration, the applicant's contention that his Certificate of Training for the successful completion of the AWOAC was not in his file at the time that he was considered for promotion to CW4 is not...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080004022
The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration to lieutenant colonel by a special selection board (SSB), under the 2006 year criteria. The applicant also states, in effect, that he would like his records to be carefully considered by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records and reviewed as early as possible since he received a second pass-over for lieutenant colonel by the 2007 Reserve Components Selection Board (RCSB). In an advisory opinion, dated 2 May 2005, the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013271C080407
The applicant states, in effect, that he believes he was not selected for promotion to CW4 because several key documents were missing from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) and the record reviewed by the Reserve Component Selection Board (RCSB) in March 2007. This official further states that based on these omissions, the applicant is eligible for promotion consideration by a DA Promotion Advisory Board (PAB), and it is recommended the applicant be granted PAB consideration under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017287
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 16 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070017287 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion reconsideration for chief warrant officer three (CW3) by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2007 year criteria. The applicant was considered and not selected for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001053635C070420
He further contended that the 1995 non-selection should not be considered a passover because Paragraph 2-4d of Army Regulation 135-155 provides that, ”Nonselection for promotion under this paragraph does not constitute a passover.” It provides that, if a request for a reconsideration is received within one year of the prior consideration and the case has not been previously reconsidered, it will be resubmitted to the Board if there is evidence (including but not limited to any facts or...