Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011094
Original file (20070011094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  15 January 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070011094 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Dean L. Turnbull

Analyst

The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Curtis L. Greenway

Chairperson

Mr. Joe R. Schroeder

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show the award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM).

2.  The applicant states he was awarded the ARCOM but it was never recorded on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).  He would like for his DD Form 214 to be corrected and a copy sent to him. 

3.  The applicant does not provide any additional documentation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military service records show that he was inducted and entered active duty on 28 September 1966.  He completed all the necessary training and was awarded the military occupational specialty (MOS) 11C (Infantry Indirect Fire Crewman).

3.  He served a tour with Company A, 1st Battalion, 22nd Infantry, 4th Infantry Division in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 27 March 1967 to 4 March 1968.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty and transferred to the U. S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training) "USAAC", St. Louis, Missouri on  
27 June 1968 after serving a total of 1 year and 9 months of active service.

5.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnamese Campaign Medal, two Overseas Service Bars, Combat Infantryman Badge, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), and Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge (81mm Mortar Bar).  However, it does not show the ARCOM.

6.  Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division General Orders Number 899 dated  
3 March 1968 shows that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM for meritorious service for action during the period March 1967 to March 1968.

7.  A Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations not shown in item 24 of his DD Form 214.

8.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in the Republic of Vietnam.  This document shows the unit, to which the applicant was assigned, 22nd Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, was cited for an award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 54, dated 1974 and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 53, dated 1970.

9.  The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.  However, his DD Form 214 does not show any bronze service stars indicating campaign credit.

10.  Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that based on the applicant's dates of service in the Republic of Vietnam, he participated in the Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase II (1 July 1966 to 31 May 1967), Vietnam Counteroffensive, Phase III (1 June 1967 to 29 January 1968), and Tet Counteroffensive (30 January to 1 April 1968).  This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to show the ARCOM.

2.  Orders show that the applicant was awarded the ARCOM.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award.

3.  Evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal, First Class Unit Citation.  Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show these foreign unit awards.

4.  Evidence shows that the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam.  Therefore, he is entitled to three bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.

BOARD VOTE:

__QAS__  __CLG___  __JRS__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show ARCOM, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars to be affixed to his Vietnam Service Medal.




___Curtis L. Greenway__
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20080115
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003678

    Original file (20130003678.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. Records show that the applicant participated in three campaign periods during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 25 January 1967 to 24...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012224

    Original file (20130012224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012224 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. DAGOs awarded the following unit awards to the unit for actions during his tenure; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show these unit awards: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award) * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal with First Class Unit Citation * Presidential Unit Citation BOARD VOTE: ___X____...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018882

    Original file (20140018882.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the united States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM), the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device. In light of this evidence and his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the AGCM based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 7 December 1967 to 15 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001242

    Original file (20120001242.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of total active service. 4th Battalion, 23rd Infantry, was cited for award of the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation for the period April 1966 through August 1968 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 48, dated 1971 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class for the period 30 April 1966 through 21 January 1970 by DAGO Number 51, dated 1971 b. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010692

    Original file (20110010692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214. The evidence of record shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the KDSM; therefore, he is also entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 24 of his DD Form 214 by deleting "Vietnam Service Medal with Bronze Service Star" and adding the entries: * Purple Heart * Bronze Star Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003512C070208

    Original file (20040003512C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant states that he was awarded the ARCOM on 1 November 1968 for meritorious service while serving in Vietnam. In light of the above, and the absence of orders awarding the applicant the ARCOM, the Certificate dated 1 November 1968 is accepted as sufficient evidence to support correcting the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020860

    Original file (20110020860.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    General Orders awarded the applicant the ARCOM for: meritorious service in support of United States objectives in the Republic of Vietnam during the period October 1966 to August 1967 while serving as a member of Headquarters and Service Battery, 6th Battalion, 29th Artillery, 4th Infantry Division. The applicant claims he should be awarded the CIB because he was an RTO in an infantry unit and was present when the unit engaged in active ground combat. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003851

    Original file (20140003851.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Combat Infantryman Badge 6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the AGCM was awarded to enlisted Soldiers who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005677

    Original file (20080005677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Good Conduct Medal for the period 14 December 1965 to 13 December 1967, and to correct his military records to show the award of the Good Conduct Medal. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his military records to show two bronze service stars to be affixed to his already awarded Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006501

    Original file (20130006501.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * although he provided past combat missions and patrols and letters, the Board denied his request for award of the CIB * no award for good conduct was noted in his records * his Army Military Human Resource Record is not accurate 3. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20100010460, dated 14...