Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010157
Original file (20070010157.txt) Auto-classification: Approved


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  31 January 2008
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070010157 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Dean L. Turnbull

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. John Infante

Chairperson

Mr. Eric N. Anderson

Member

Mr. David K. Haasenritter

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction to his records to adjust his chief warrant officer four (CW4) date of rank from 15 February 2007 to 1 October 2006.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that after returning from deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) 05-07 and completion of the Warrant Officer Staff Course (WOSC) he was promoted to CW4 on 15 February 2007.  However, he was eligible for promotion to CW4 and was scheduled to attend the WOSC before he was deployed to OIF 05-07.  The WOSC was cancelled prior to deployment by the order of the Brigade Commander in order to assist in the mobilization and aviation training of the unit's pilots; therefore, his promotion was delayed.  He should not be penalized due to the inability to complete the educational requirement for promotion because he was serving in a combat zone.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of an Army Training Requirements and Resources System (ATTRS) course cancellation verification dated 21 June  
2005; ATTRS student reservation printout; Boone National Guard Center Orders 234-157 dated 22 August 2005; Statement of Service dated 5 August 2006; Boone National Guard Center Orders 348-051 dated 14 December 2006; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 76 AR dated 30 March 2007; and DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) dated
2 February 2007.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 27 February 2002, a Federal Recognition Board was held by the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG) to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory in his physical qualifications, moral character, and general qualifications.

2.  On 22 August 2002, the State of Kentucky Department of Military Affairs, Office of the Adjutant General, issued Orders 234-801 for appointment of the applicant as a chief warrant officer three (CW3) effective 24 July 2002.

3.  The applicant accepted an appointment as a CW3 in the KYARNG on 24 July 2002.

4.  On 24 July 2002, the applicant executed an Oaths of Office as a CW3 in the KYARNG and was granted temporary Federal Recognition.

5.  A DA Form 1059 shows that the applicant attended and completed the  
UH-60 Instructor Pilot course 04-003 on 2 March 2004.

6.  The ATRRS student reservation printout shows that the applicant was scheduled to attend the WOSC on 10 July 2005.  On 21 June 2005, the applicant was notified by the NGB of his training seat cancellation to attend the WOSC due to the mobilization of his unit.

7.  The Boone National Guard Center Orders 234-157 dated 22 August  
2005 shows that the applicant was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom for 545 days.  

8.  On 2 December 2006, the applicant was honorably released from active duty and transferred to Company E, 135th Aviation, Frankfort, Kentucky of the KYARNG.

9.  A DA Form 1059 shows that the applicant attended and completed  
WOSC 07-04 on 2 February 2007.

10.  On 15 February 2007, the proceedings of a Federal Recognition Examining Board was held by the KYARNG to determine if the applicant was qualified to be awarded Federal Recognition.  The proceedings indicated that the applicant was satisfactory in his physical qualifications, moral character, and general qualifications.

11.  NGB Special Orders Number 76 AR dated 30 March 2007, awarded the extension of Federal Recognition for permanent appointment in the Army National Guard in the rank of CW4, effective 15 February 2007.

12.  In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion, dated 14 December 2007, was obtained from the NGB.  The NGB recommends approval of the applicant's request to adjust his promotion effective date and date of rank to
1 October 2006 based on the applicant having been enrolled in the WOSC and having been removed from the course list due to mobilization in support of OIF.  The applicant had met the time-in-grade and time-in-service requirements for promotion on 1 October 2006 and he was recommended for promotion by his Battalion and Brigade Commanders.  The NGB recommends that the applicant receive all back pay and allowances.

13.  On 18 December 2007, a copy of the advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for comment and/or rebuttal.  On 28 December 2007, the applicant concurred with the advisory opinion.
14.  National Guard Regulation 600-101, Paragraph 7-2d and table 7-2, in effect then and now, provides that all warrant officers recommended for promotion must be fully qualified.  In addition, warrant officers in the grade of CW2 to CW5 must also possess those additional requirements of Army Pamphlet 611-21 or other document(s), which stipulate a requirement to be qualified in an SQI. Furthermore, the minimum military educational and time-in-grade requirement for promotion to CW4 is WOSC and 4 years time-in-grade as a CW3.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence shows that the applicant was scheduled to attend WOSC on  
10 July 2005 and had met all the requirements for promotion to CW4.  However, prior to attending the WOSC, the applicant received notification from the NGB that his training seat was cancelled due to mobilization of his unit.  Through no fault of the applicant he was not able to attend the WOSC and therefore, he was not promoted until after he returned from OIF and completed the WOSC on
2 February 2007.

2.  In view of the forgoing, and in the interest of equity, it is clear that the applicant should not be held responsible for not completing the educational requirement for promotion to CW4.

3.  As such, the applicant's ARNG and Department of the Army records should be corrected by amending NGB Special Orders Number 76 AR dated 30 March 2007 to show the effective date of permanent Federal Recognition in the rank of CW4 as 1 October 2006.

BOARD VOTE:

__JI        _  __ENA__  __DKH__  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that the state Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected, as appropriate, by amending NGB Special Order Numbers 76 AR dated 30 March 2007 to show the effective date of permanent Federal Recognition in the rank of CW4 as 1 October 2006.

2.  Additionally, Defense Finance and Accounting Office should audit the applicant's pay records and provide the applicant all pay and allowances due him based on the above corrections.




____John Infante    _____
          CHAIRPERSON




INDEX

CASE ID
AR
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20080131
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
GRANT
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015976

    Original file (20060015976.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He requested and received a correction to his military records and in September 2003 was promoted to CW3 with a date of rank of 8 March 1998. When he was not promoted to CW4 on 8 March 2004, he inquired and was told that he needed to complete the WOSC to be eligible for promotion consideration. However, the NGB denied his request and so informed the applicant that he was required to complete this course of study prior to being promoted.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001995

    Original file (20090001995.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Medical records covering the period from 16 May to 25 May 2005 documenting the applicant's treatment for acute bronchitis and pneumonia; c. A memorandum from the applicant to the President of the Promotion Board, dated 30 January 2008, requesting a waiver of the WOAC requirement for promotion to CW4 in which she outlines the history of her efforts to attend the WOAC and the reasons she had not been successful in scheduling and completing the course, which included her "civilian job and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018084

    Original file (20090018084.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NGB stated that when the applicant was promoted the education waiver provision had expired and the applicant was not qualified in the MOS for which he was being promoted into. The NGB states that the applicant was promoted to CW4 without having completed the required training (WOSC) or time in grade (TIG). Army Regulation 135–155, Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers Other Than General Officers, Table 2–3, Warrant officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002105

    Original file (20080002105.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that in March 2001, after transferring to an Engineer Battalion of the Kentucky Army National Guard (KYARNG), after being asked, he accepted command of E Company, 2006th Engineer Battalion. Boone National Guard Center, Frankfort, Kentucky (KY), Orders Number 092-812, dated 2 April 2003, promoted the applicant to CPT, effective 22 May 2003, and NGB Special Orders Number 132 AR, dated 22 May 2003, granted the applicant Federal Recognition in the rank of CPT,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002400

    Original file (20120002400.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002400 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant provides: * self-authored statements * Promotion Memorandum, National Guard Bureau (NGB), dated 1 July 2009 * Memorandum, dated 25 October 2006, from the Operations Officer, Property Accountability Inspection, Office of the Inspector General * Special Orders Number 161AR, NGB, Washington, DC, dated 1 July 2009 * National Guard Regulation 600-101 (Warrant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070017326

    Original file (20070017326.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his promotion date to Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) be backdated to, in effect, 9 March 2007, the date he became eligible for promotion. To be considered for Federal Recognition and concurrent Reserve of the Army promotion following State promotion to fill a unit vacancy, an ARNG warrant officer must be in an active status and duty MOS qualified; be medically fit in accordance with AR 40-501 and meet the height and weight standards prescribed in AR 600-9; have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017636

    Original file (20080017636.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his Chief Warrant Officer Four (CW4) promotion and Federal Recognition effective date be corrected to reflect 29 January 2008 vice 12 March 2008. The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Headquarters, 1st Battalion, 137th Aviation Regiment Memorandum, subject: Verification of Promotion Eligibility for (applicant), dated 26 September 2008; National Guard Bureau (NGB) Special Orders Number 214 AR, dated 19 August...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020445

    Original file (20110020445.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * Prior to the 2011 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), Army National Guard (ARNG) officers were promoted by the Chief, National Guard Bureau (NGB) * After the 2011 NDAA, the authority was elevated from the Secretary of the service to the President of the United States * When the new policy was signed into law, many officials were unaware of the significant changes it entailed * The change led to a delay by the NGB in processing promotion actions * In his case, a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007474

    Original file (20120007474.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This change resulted in no National Guard warrant officers being promoted from January 2011 until 11 August 2011. NGB Policy Memorandum 11-015, Subject: Federal Recognition of WOs in the ARNG, dated 14 June 2011, states that ARNG WOs are initially appointed and are also promoted by the State or Territory to which the officer is assigned. The NGB issued orders extending Federal recognition to him as a CW4 effective 28 October 2011 despite him having been promoted by the State effective 18...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021286

    Original file (20110021286.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 19 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021286 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to chief warrant officer four (CW4) from 12 August 2011 as indicated in his Federal recognition orders to 25 January 2011 as indicated in his State promotion orders. The evidence of record shows the applicant's DOR as CW3 was 21 January 2006 and he completed the WO Staff Course in March 2010.