Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007454
Original file (20070007454.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied


RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


	IN THE CASE OF:	  


	BOARD DATE:	  20 September 2007
	DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20070007454 


	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  


Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano

Director

Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj

Analyst


The following members, a quorum, were present:


Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann

Chairperson

Mr. Dean A. Camarella

Member

Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree

Member

	The Board considered the following evidence: 

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to allow for reenlistment in the Army.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that prior to his discharge in March 2005, he underwent a medical examination and was diagnosed with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD).  He further states that he recently attempted to rejoin the Army, but was informed that he was permanently barred from reentering the service.  He also states that he is currently rated 10 percent disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and believes he is deliberately blacklisted. He concludes that a reevaluation of his medical condition would allow him to rejoin the Army.

3.  The applicant provides in support of his application a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); a statement dated, 17 April 2007, by the Lancaster, California, Community Based Outpatient Clinic (CBOC); a disability rating statement by the DVA, dated 13 March 2007; an electronic copy of Standard Form (SF) 600 (Chronological Records of Medical Care); and a copy of his DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 1 February 2005.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 March 2001 for a period of 4 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 91W (Health Care Specialist).  

2.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was honorably released from active duty on 21 March 2005 in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) for completion of required active service.  This form further shows that he was given a "Reentry" (RE) code of 1.

3.  Item 18 (Remarks) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that the applicant served in an imminent danger area for contingency operations in Kuwait during the period 15 December 2001 through 5 May 2002 and in Kuwait and Iraq during the period 6 April 2003 through 16 March 2004. 

4.  The applicant's SF 600, dated 4 November 2004 shows that he was assessed and diagnosed to have had depression, acquired leg length discrepancy, scoliatic change at cervical, thoracic, and lumber spine, and posterior rotation of the left hemi pelvis.  He was prescribed a treatment plan that included counseling; prescription drugs; hydration and exercise; manipulative therapy to the pelvis, sacrum, and spine; and he was advised to continue follow up treatment.

5.  Prior to separation, the applicant underwent a medical examination on 1 February 2005 where the attending physician noted in Item 77 (Summary of Defects and Diagnosis) of the DA Form 2808 that the applicant suffered from PTSD and in Item 78 (Recommendations, Further Specialist Examinations Indicated) that the applicant may need follow up for PTSD/Depression. 

6.  In a letter dated 13 March 2007 and submitted by the applicant, the DVA verifies that the applicant is rated 10 percent disabled due to service-connected causes and that he is collecting monthly disability compensation benefits.

7.  In a statement dated 17 April 2007 and submitted by the applicant, a medical doctor states that the applicant is a patient at the CBPOC, Lancaster, California, and that he has no obvious signs of mental or musculoskeletal illness.

8.  There is no evidence in the applicant's records that he was denied reenlistment.  A staff member of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, G-1, Pentagon, Virginia, contacted the Headquarters of U.S. Army Recruiting Command (USAREC) and verified that there is no record that the applicant has attempted to reenlist. 

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Paragraph 2-1 of this regulation states that the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.

10.  Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program), covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army (RA) and the US Army Reserve.  Chapter 3 of that regulation prescribes basic eligibility for prior service applicants for enlistment.  That chapter includes a list of Armed Forces RE codes, including Regular Army RE codes.  RE–1 applies to persons completing their term of service who are considered qualified to reenter the Army.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his records should be corrected to allow him to reenlist in the Army.

2.  The Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) does not correct records solely for the purpose of establishing eligibility for other programs or benefits.  The applicant is advised that if he desires to reenlist, he should contact a local recruiter who can best advise him on his eligibility for returning to military service.  Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and may process enlistment waivers for eligible applicants.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy that requirement.  Therefore, there is no action required.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__jcr___  __dac___  __qas___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



							Jeffrey C. Redmann
______________________
          CHAIRPERSON



INDEX

CASE ID
AR20070007454
SUFFIX

RECON

DATE BOARDED
20070920
TYPE OF DISCHARGE

DATE OF DISCHARGE

DISCHARGE AUTHORITY

DISCHARGE REASON

BOARD DECISION
(DENY)
REVIEW AUTHORITY

ISSUES         1.
100.0300
2.

3.

4.

5.

6.


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012164

    Original file (20080012164.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    e. AF Form 3899 showing transfer from Landstuhl Regional Medical Center to US Army Medical Activity (USA MEDDAC), Fort Carson, CO. f. Two SFs 513E (Consultation Report) from Family Practice and printed on 13 October 2004. g. Automated SF 600 (Medical Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care), dated 13 October 2004. h. Two Department of Veterans Affairs’ (DVA) Progress Notes, dated 2 May 2007 and 25 January 2008 (2 pages). Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060007527C070205

    Original file (20060007527C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records contain a copy of his Report of Medical Examination, dated 13 July 2004, which was prepared prior to his entrance on active duty and shows that he was qualified for enlistment with a 111121 physical profile. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant has failed to show, through the evidence submitted with his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | AR20050012554C070206

    Original file (AR20050012554C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Deputy State Surgeon indicated that the applicant had declined medical care at the Mobilization Station and requested Release from Active Duty (REFRAD). There is no evidence in the available record which indicates whether the applicant or his family members used or sought the use of these TAMP health care benefits. The record provides a memorandum from the Military Department of Arkansas, Office of the Adjutant General (TAG), dated 11 May 2005, directing the applicant and spouse (if...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010968

    Original file (20070010968.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides the following additional documentary evidence in support of his application: a. DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 14 April 1969 and 2 July 1971; b. DA Form 3355-R (Promotion Points Worksheet); c. DA Form 8-118 (Medical Board Proceedings), dated 5 April 1971; d. Certificate of Recognition for service during the Cold War; e. Photograph of the applicant with another Soldier, dated 1970; f. Extract of newspaper article...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060004444C070205

    Original file (20060004444C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    David W. Tucker | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states, in effect, that he believes that either his RE Code is wrong or the Separation Code was mistyped based on the evidence presented. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006789

    Original file (20080006789.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    3d Battalion, 8th Cavalry Regiment memorandum addressed to the applicant indicates that he was reduced from the rank of sergeant/pay grade E-5 to the rank of private/pay grade E-1 effective 21 December 1982 and further indicates action to separate the applicant under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) and paragraph 8-11 of Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System). The applicant's DD Form 214 for the period ending on 10...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01154

    Original file (PD-2014-01154.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Examination noted normal lumbar spine ROM with pain and normal bilateral hip ROM.An orthopedic evaluation on 27 March 2009, 5 months prior to separation, noted a 16-month history of pelvic pain following pregnancy. At...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060010500C071029

    Original file (20060010500C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (SPD Codes) prescribes the specific authorities (regulatory, statutory, or other directives), the reasons for the separation of members from active military service, and the SPD codes to be used for these stated reasons. Pertinent Army regulations provide that, prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. There is no evidence of record which shows the reentry code...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070004001C071029

    Original file (20070004001C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Dennis J. Phillips | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant provides an incident report, dated 16 July 2004, and five pages of medical records. The applicant was one of the injured.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070015897

    Original file (20070015897.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his records be corrected by changing his reentry eligibility code (RE Code) from "NA" to RE-3 which would allow him to reenter the Army. The applicant's record shows that he initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 October 2001 for a period of 3 years. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason for discharge.